similar to: echo cancelation

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 70000 matches similar to: "echo cancelation"

2006 Dec 05
0
problem with echo cancellation
Hi Julia, Version 1.2-beta1 has a bug in the echo canceller. Try either svn or 1.1.12 -- or apply this patch to 1.2beta1: https://trac.xiph.org/changeset/11882 Jean-Marc julia rg a ?crit : > Hello Jean-Marc, > > > > I solved the variable delay problem, but I still have trouble with > speex_echo_cancel(). When i try testecho.c with clean speech for far-end input > and
2006 Oct 27
2
Echo Canceller trouble in 1.2beta1
Terrific! The patch fixes my problem quite decisively. I will want to use this with a 16K sample rate. Is it expected to work well with just another slight patch, or will we need to modify it more deeply? Also, are there any tunable parameters besides tail length? I am wondering about the aggressiveness of adaptation and I know you are an expert in that area. Thanks so much, Michael
2004 Jul 07
2
Problem SIP Register
I have * box on machine with external ip address and internal one I'm tring to register to it from to machines - one from innternet ( everything is ok - in sip.conf nat=yes)\ and the other one is in the internal network (in sip.conf - nat=no ) and it say 403 Forbidden? Any Ideas ? here are the logs and configs From the external SIP Client whic registers.
2006 Jul 19
0
echo cancellation seg faults
On closer looks and debugging I always end up in speex_echo_cancel function with comment /* Temporary adaption rate if filter is not adapted correctly */ Does this give any clue to the problem? I wonder why it would not find its mirror image as an echo and do echo cancellation? Any insight is appreciated. If you need some more data, tell me. Thanks -Anurag Quoting ac2491@columbia.edu: >
2006 May 11
0
Echo Canceller Memory Usage, Frame Size
(from thread Re: [Speex-dev] Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP, but this is a more general topic) >> With these changes, the link was successful, using testecho.c with some >> modifications for the C55 environment. The code and data memory >> requirements were a lot more than I had hoped (>20kbytes of dynamic data >> memory for block size=128, tail length = 1024),
2004 Aug 25
2
Echo Cancellation
Hello, I am testing speex 1.1.6's echo canceller. I am using testecho.c, with a few modifications to get it to run on Windows. My problem is that I am unable to get the echo cancellation to work correctly. I am working on an audio conferencing software, and one issue we have is sometimes the microphone picks up what is being played through the headset, resulting in an echo of the other
2006 Jul 19
0
echo cancellation seg faults
Hi, I tried keeping it for a very long time and put logs there and it always went to not adapting. This is how I initialize speex_echo_cancel SpeexEchoState* _echoState = speex_echo_state_init(160, 320*10); I have 20 msecs of audio with 16bits for a sample. If two frames are identical and are given to speex_echo_cancel for many iterations, should I expect silence. Thanks -Anurag Quoting
2006 Oct 27
0
Echo Canceller trouble in 1.2beta1
Can you first try the svn version (or apply https://trac.xiph.org/changeset/11882). As I mentioned in a previous email, there's a bad bug in the 1.2beta1 echo canceller. Jean-Marc Coffey, Michael a ?crit : > Hi Folks, > > I am having trouble using speex_echo_cancel. As a starting point, I am > using the testecho.c source code. I compiled the 1.2beta1 version. I > have not
2006 May 09
0
Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP
>Just tried your files and I'm not running into any infinite loops and >the cancellation works fine. Unless the C6x has the same problem, I >suspect a 16-bit problem. I'll check and see if I find something. About >the r=0 problem, I can't find where it ends up in a denominator, so I >suspect is not (directly) the problem. I built and ran the same test on the TI C64
2005 Nov 09
0
Re: aec
Are you sure you're not just inverting the two inputs? Jean-Marc On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 22:16 -0800, Jason Harper wrote: > I ran some further tests on mdf and here are the > results: > 1. reduced tail length to 100ms, aligned mic and > speaker signals to within 10ms - almost no echo > attenuation > 2. aligned mic and speaker signals to within 5 samples > - still almost
2006 May 08
0
Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP
> I've just been made aware of these problems (look for the thread "speex > echo cancellation limitations"). It's on my short-term TODO list. I saw the other thread, my problems happened in different (but similar) routines. >> If fftwrap.c, I ifdefed out the spx_fft_float and spx_ifft_float >> routines, >> because there were not used and required
2006 May 10
0
Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP
Jean-Marc, Well I finally tracked down the problem. Then I checked my mail and found that you had fixed it several hours earlier. :( Build 11387 produces the same result as my modified build 11343. Because of compiler limitations in the TI tools, I did have to make modifications to pseudofloat.h (separating return of float values) and nb_celp.c (adding braces around a variable declaration
2008 Sep 07
1
Echo cancelling results
Hi, I wanted to play around with the echo canceller so I tried the testecho program. As speaker sound I fed it with a 440 Hz sine wave, and as mic with a 550 Hz + 440 Hz sine waves sound (but the 440 Hz component half the amplitude). I kind of expected to get a somewhat clean 550 Hz sine out, but it doesn't seem to work that way. Are there better samples I can use with testecho to see
2006 Dec 05
2
problem with echo cancellation
Hello Jean-Marc, I solved the variable delay problem, but I still have trouble with speex_echo_cancel(). When i try testecho.c with clean speech for far-end input and same speech with attenuation, a bit of reverb and 50-150 ms delay, all this done in sound editor, for mic input, i get 5-8 db attenuation. But when i use the same speech played and recorded for mic input, i see about 5 db of
2006 Jul 19
2
echo cancellation seg faults
Hi, If I pass the same ref and the echo data to the echo cancellation API, I am expecting silence as output. I get back the original audio data. Is this correct? Thanks -Anurag Quoting ac2491@columbia.edu: > Hi Jean, > > I got the earlier problem fied with correct NN and tail values. > But > I dont see any echo being cancelled. To the echo cancel API I am > giving, audio
2005 Nov 09
0
Re: aec
This kind of behaviour is odd. One of the reason could be the fact that you're using a really long impulse response. Try syncing your signals and making the tail length more in the order of 100 ms to 300 ms. Jean-Marc Le dimanche 06 novembre 2005 ? 21:25 -0800, Jason Harper a ?crit : > Thanks for alerting me to the new changes. I just > tried the latest code from SVN, but
2006 Oct 27
0
Echo Canceller trouble in 1.2beta1
> I will want to use this with a 16K sample rate. Is it expected to > work well with just another slight patch, or will we need to modify > it more deeply? Just use SPEEX_ECHO_GET_SAMPLING_RATE to let the aec know what sampling rate you're using (default is 8000). > Also, are there any tunable parameters besides tail length? I am > wondering about the aggressiveness of
2006 Jul 12
0
some echo cancellation tests
Hi I have tested echo cancellation using some different examples. TEST 1. First, I record my voice, named TestVoice1. Then I perform testecho using TestVoice1 as the data of both mic and speaker. Final, I get a ideal result after modified the parameters for several times. It means the output is almost silent. I think this shows the echo cancellation can work. TEST 2. Then I edit the TestVoice1
2006 Jul 19
2
echo cancellation seg faults
Probably the level of your signal is too low and/or you're just not letting it time to adapt. Jean-Marc Le mercredi 19 juillet 2006 ? 19:00 -0400, ac2491@columbia.edu a ?crit : > On closer looks and debugging I always end up in > > speex_echo_cancel function with comment > /* Temporary adaption rate if filter is not adapted correctly */ > > > Does this give any clue
2005 Nov 04
0
Re: aec
I've recently made changes to the AEC. Please try the code in SVN and see if it works better. Jean-Marc Le jeudi 03 novembre 2005 ? 22:36 -0800, Jason Harper a ?crit : > I've tried some further debugging to see what mdf is > actually doing. Instead of sending: > tmp_out = (float)ref[i] - st->y[i+st->frame_size] > to the output, I just sent >