Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Introduction and patch"
2007 Mar 08
0
Introduction and patch
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the patch, I'll apply it to svn. One question, why do you
need this:
+void kiss_fftri2(kiss_fftr_cfg cfg,const kiss_fft_scalar
*freqdata,kiss_fft_scalar *timedata);
+
Cheers,
Jean-Marc
Dan Everton a ?crit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm one of the people working on the Rockbox project
> (http://www.rockbox.org) which is an open source alternative firmware
> for a
2015 Mar 04
1
[RFC PATCH v1] Decode(float) optimize using libNe10
Hello All,
I extended the libNE10 optimizations for float towards
mdct_backwards/opus_ifft.
I am able to get about 14.26% improvement for Decode use
case now on my Beaglebone Black. Please see [1] for measurements.
Questions
1. Since this patch needs to go in after Encode [2] patch)
should I submit this as patch series?
2. Since Jonathan Lennox posted intrinsics cleanup [3]
patch, should
2007 Apr 15
3
question about spx_fft
Hi Jean-Marc and list,
Is the spx_fft function in fftwrap.c a standard fft function?
void spx_fft(void *table, spx_word16_t *in, spx_word16_t *out)
When I say standard, I mean the input "in" is 128 point short data for
example and
the output "out" is 128 short complex value which is stored in 256
short array with real and
image part. Looks like the function did some
2015 Feb 04
4
[RFC PATCH v2] Encode optimize using libNe10
Changes from RFC PATCH v1:
- passing arch parameter explicitly
- reduced stack usage by ~3.5K by using scaled NE10 fft version
- moved all optimization array functions to arm_celt_map.c
- Other cleanups pointed out by Timothy
Phil,
As you mentioned earlier, could you please address all
compile and linker errors/warnings coming out of Ne10 library?
You can find my working Ne10 repo at [1]
You
2015 Mar 03
1
[RFC PATCH v4] Enable optimize using libNe10
Changes from RFC PATCH v3
- Just rebased on tip
- For all else, please see notes from RFC PATCH v3 at
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/2015-March/002902.html
- latest wip opus tree/branch
https://git.linaro.org/people/viswanath.puttagunta/Ne10.git
branch: rfcv4_final_fft_ne10
Viswanath Puttagunta (1):
armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
Makefile.am
2015 Mar 03
2
[RFC PATCHv3] Encode optimize using libNe10
Changes from RFC PATCH v2
- fixed compile issue when just compiling for --enable-intrinsics
for ARMv7 without NE10
- Notes for NE10:
- All compile/link warnings are now in upstream NE10
- Only patch pending upstream in NE10 is the one that
needs to add -funsafe-math-optimizations for ARMv7
targets.
- Phil Wang @ ARM is working on getting this fixed.
- Note that even without
2015 Jan 20
6
[RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Encode optimize using libNE10
Hello opus-dev,
I've been cooking up this patchset to integrate NE10 library into opus.
Current patchset focuses on encode use case mainly effecting performance of
clt_mdct_forward() and opus_fft() (for float only)
Glad to report the following on Encode use case:
(Measured on my Beaglebone Black Cortex-A8 board)
- Performance improvement for encode use case ~= 12.34% (Based on time -p
2006 Nov 15
2
[PATCH] symbian port
hi,
this patch should fix the symbian build.
/alfred
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: speex-symbian2.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2669 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20061115/5ac4915e/speex-symbian2.bin
2015 May 08
8
[RFC PATCH v2]: Ne10 fft fixed and previous 0/8]
Hi All,
As per Timothy's suggestion, disabling mdct_forward
for fixed point. Only effects
armv7,armv8: Extend fixed fft NE10 optimizations to mdct
Rest of patches are same as in [1]
For reference, latest wip code for opus is at [2]
Still working with NE10 team at ARM to get corner cases of
mdct_forward. Will update with another patch
when issue in NE10 gets fixed.
Regards,
Vish
[1]:
2015 Mar 18
5
[RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Enable aarch64 intrinsics/Ne10
Hi All,
Since I continue to base my work on top of Jonathan's patch,
and my previous Ne10 fft/ifft/mdct_forward/backward patches,
I thought it would be better to just post all new patches
as a patch series. Please let me know if anyone disagrees
with this approach.
You can see wip branch of all latest patches at
https://git.linaro.org/people/viswanath.puttagunta/opus.git
Branch:
2015 May 15
11
[RFC V3 0/8] Ne10 fft fixed and previous
Hi All,
Changes from RFC v2 [1]
armv7,armv8: Extend fixed fft NE10 optimizations to mdct
- Overflow issue fixed by Phil at ARM. Ne10 wip at [2]. Should be upstream soon.
- So, re-enabled using fixed fft for mdct_forward which was disabled in RFCv2
armv7,armv8: Optimize fixed point fft using NE10 library
- Thanks to Jonathan Lennox, fixed some build fixes on iOS and some copy-paste errors
Rest
2015 Apr 28
10
[RFC PATCH v1 0/8] Ne10 fft fixed and previous
Hello Timothy / Jean-Marc / opus-dev,
This patch series is follow up on work I posted on [1].
In addition to what was posted on [1], this patch series mainly
integrates Fixed point FFT implementations in NE10 library into opus.
You can view my opus wip code at [2].
Note that while I found some issues both with the NE10 library(fixed fft)
and with Linaro toolchain (armv8 intrinsics), the work
2015 Mar 31
6
[RFC PATCH v1 0/5] aarch64: celt_pitch_xcorr: Fixed point series
Hi Timothy,
As I mentioned earlier [1], I now fixed compile issues
with fixed point and resubmitting the patch.
I also have new patch that does intrinsics optimizations
for celt_pitch_xcorr targetting aarch64.
You can find my latest work-in-progress branch at [2]
For reference, you can use the Ne10 pre-built libraries
at [3]
Note that I am working with Phil at ARM to get my patch at [4]
2006 Oct 20
5
To symbian and speex developers! Building instructions
Hello to everyone!
During building speex library for Symbian OS I encountered some problems. All thess problems can be solved by modifying the speex sources. I don't have access to SVN repository of speex, so I will just describe the changes to be done:
1) mmp file in symbian derictory misses windows.c sources. You need to add this string into speex.mmp:
SOURCES windows.c
2) Symbian OS
2006 Nov 15
1
[PATCH] symbian port
hi Jean-Marc,
I just updated from svn and it looks like there are some errors in the speex.mmp
file. the filters.c is duplicated, and the fft/kiss.c files are still missing..
/alfred
Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> Applied in svn. Thanks.
>
> Jean-Marc
>
> Alfred E. Heggestad a ?crit :
>> hi,
>>
>> this patch should fix the symbian build.
>>
>>
>>
2014 Feb 21
2
Make check failure on clone from 31 January
I tracked down the bug to an incorrect use of restrict.
I would not consider this a compiler bug: we are lying to the optimizer by
telling it that a pointer is restrict when in fact it isn't.
This can be fixed like so:
diff --git a/celt/mdct.c b/celt/mdct.c
index 1634e8e..fa5098c 100644
--- a/celt/mdct.c
+++ b/celt/mdct.c
@@ -276,8 +276,8 @@ void clt_mdct_backward(const mdct_lookup *l,
2006 May 10
2
Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP
> Build 11387 produces the same result as my modified build 11343. Because of
> compiler limitations in the TI tools, I did have to make modifications to
> pseudofloat.h (separating return of float values) and nb_celp.c (adding
> braces around a variable declaration in the middle of code). I have
> attached a patch. You might prefer to do the nb_celp.c change in a
>
2006 Oct 23
2
Bug with the new preprocessor
The frame size is 320
Ouss
-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca]
Sent: lundi 23 octobre 2006 18:26
To: Ouss
Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org
Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Bug with the new preprocessor
What frame size are you using?
Jean-Marc
Ouss a ?crit :
> Hello,
>
> I have an (Access violation reading location) on line 115 in the fftwrap.c
2014 Feb 24
1
Make check failure on clone from 31 January
After a few experiments, I found that both alternatives are very similar, and 2~5% slower compared to the following:
diff --git a/celt/mdct.c b/celt/mdct.c
index 1634e8e..e490c3b 100644
--- a/celt/mdct.c
+++ b/celt/mdct.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ void clt_mdct_backward(const mdct_lookup *l, kiss_fft_scalar *in, kiss_fft_scala
it in-place. */
{
kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT yp0 =
2006 May 09
2
Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP
> I built and ran the same test on the TI C64 simulator, and the echo was
> canceled nicely (about 10:1 reduction in the peak amplitude during the
> second of two brief speech bursts). So, my problem must again be related to
> the 16-bit processing on the C5X DSPs.
Good. At least we've narrowed it down a bit.
> Also, the line where it is hanging is:
>