similar to: Re: Speex-dev Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Re: Speex-dev Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10"

2007 Feb 09
1
speex in C# please help
hello guys this is my code for the C# wrapper. ================================= using System; using System.Runtime.InteropServices; using System.IO; namespace Speex { ///<summary> ///the following class is the win32 SPEEX API that retrieve ///methods and structures from the libspeex file ///</summary> public unsafe class Speex_win32 { #region Speex Constants //global speex
2007 Feb 13
0
Re: Speex-dev Digest, Vol 33, Issue 9
Hi All, I am trying to cross compile speex-1.1.12 to powerpc-405, i get a error after the make, speexec.lo error, please help me how to get rid of this error. On 2/9/07, speex-dev-request@xiph.org <speex-dev-request@xiph.org> wrote: > Send Speex-dev mailing list submissions to > speex-dev@xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >
2008 Jul 30
1
Speex in VB .NET
Hi there, I have searched what seems like everywhere and was unable to find a .NET wrapper so that I can use speex in VB. I did find a speex.NET.dll but this didn't seem to work on what I needed. I therefore decided I could just use DllImport within VB .NET and create my own unmanaged links to libspeex.dll. With the help of this partial c# code
2006 Nov 27
1
R.DLL mapping by P/Invoke
After a long processing, I was able to create a version of a small C# class that was able to emulate the rproxy by P/Invoke. This is mostly to find a workaround a performance problem of the StatConnector. It's almost work but ... I have strange memory exception when I call the print function. The variable seems to not survive from one call to the other. As there is no debug symbol for
2006 Dec 29
0
using speex in C#
Hi SAITAMA Taro, I have been using speex-1.2beta1 dll in our voice application written with C#. In order to use Speex correctly firstly I advice to you examination speexenc and speexdec projects. I have used unsafe code and fixed statements in C#. I have added following method to library and I used that instead of speex_encoder_init simply. void *speex_encoder_init_new(int modeID) { const
2006 Dec 28
0
using speex in C#
Hi, I have read the message below, http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2006-October/004924.html and try to use P/Invoke to use speex in C#. This is a part of my code. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SpeexBits { IntPtr chars; // "raw" data int nbBits; // Total number of bits stored in the stream int charPtr; // Position of the byte
2020 Oct 12
2
Lookup sid with libsmbclient (invoked from c# on mono)
Typical example: Here is some search & export for libsmbclient: adiant at ubuntu:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu$ nm -D libsmbclient.so.0 |grep cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth_transport <nothing> adiant at ubuntu:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu$ nm -D libsmbclient.so.0 |grep cli_rpc_pipe_open U cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth adiant at ubuntu:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu$ nm -D libsmbclient.so.0
2007 Feb 08
2
AEC and resample question
I understand that the capture/playback signals need to be sync'd for an AEC to adapt. I'm a little bit confused on the requirements of synchronous sampling between the near end (mic/speaker) and the far end (phone line). I have an embedded DSP system with mic and speaker getting 1msec packets containing 8 samples. We can watch the DSP and ISDN clock frames drift and every few minutes we
2007 Oct 17
0
Using R.dll in .NET IPC
Hi - I wrapped R.dll up using somebody code online (see below). I am comparing R on .NET IPC with R(D)COM. I got it all working. Except, I realize that in my client code of the IPC remoting, if I call 'plot' function in R via EvaluateNoReturn, I don't seem to see any results on the R plot window (although the window pops up). Is there anything to do with the code of R.dll wrapper
2020 Oct 18
1
Lookup sid with libsmbclient (invoked from c# on mono)
Hi, There is some additional work to do (close lsa handle), but the far the code below is working. Let me share it with you in case somebody will have the same need that me. br Vincent LE TOUX using Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles; using System; using System.ComponentModel; using System.Diagnostics; using System.Net; using System.Runtime.InteropServices; using System.Security.Principal; namespace
2007 Feb 15
0
error during make while installing Linphone-1.5.1
Hi All, I am getting this error during make. please help me./ speexec.c: In function `speex_ec_process': speexec.c:112: syntax error before "noise" cc1: warnings being treated as errors speexec.c:133: warning: implicit declaration of function `speex_echo_state_reset' speexec.c:148: warning: passing arg 5 of `speex_echo_cancel' makes pointer from integer without a cast
2007 Jan 04
3
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
Thanks Jean-Marc. Is there a Speex trunk for the C64xx I can use? Or do I have to figure what options to turn on (in configure) when building the library? Thanks. Regards, Andy Ngo ----- Original Message ---- From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> To: ndno72-speex@yahoo.com Cc: jtrantow@ieee.org; speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 2:52:02 PM Subject:
2013 Apr 23
0
[LLVMdev] Feedback required on proper dllexport/import implementation
Hi Nico, Reid, and Anton, I missed the discussion when I implemented dllexport/dllimport for our local tree. I essentially implemented your approach#1. I was trying to avoid the various external_linkage + some_attribute approaches because it seems that external_linkage would imply the external linkage without the dllimport/dllexport semantics, and there may be existing compiler codes that rely on
2013 Apr 23
2
[LLVMdev] Feedback required on proper dllexport/import implementation
On 23.04.2013 19:10, Gao, Yunzhong wrote: > I missed the discussion when I implemented dllexport/dllimport for our local tree. I > essentially implemented your approach#1. I was trying to avoid the various > external_linkage + some_attribute approaches because it seems that external_linkage > would imply the external linkage without the dllimport/dllexport semantics, and there > may
2009 Nov 13
7
[LLVMdev] Proposal: intp type
On Nov 12, 2009, at 7:35 PM, Talin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > wrote: > > There is also the issue of how constants should be represented. > > For all current processors that I know of, an intptr will be either > 32 or 64 bits. However, there may be some future processor which > supports 128-bit pointers
2009 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: intp type
Chris Lattner wrote: > On Nov 12, 2009, at 7:35 PM, Talin wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com >> <mailto:clattner at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >> There is also the issue of how constants should be represented. >> >> For all current processors that I know of, an intptr will be either >> 32 or
2009 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: intp type
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Nov 12, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Talin wrote: > > > Well, as far as intp goes (or iptr if you prefer - the naming convention in > LLVM is i<size>) > > > How about "intptr". > > here's what I would expect: > > - General rule #1: If an instruction accepts
2014 May 24
2
make dllimport/dllexport attributes work with mingw (and others)
The following patch changes export.h so that the dllimport/dllexport attributes work with mingw/mingw-w64 and others: - changes _declspec keyword to __declspec: the former may not be defined by some toolchains. - changes the _MSC_VER condition to universally _WIN32: MSVC, as well as GCC supports this. Attached patch: declspec.diff Regards. -- O.S. -------------- next part --------------
2009 Nov 13
6
[LLVMdev] Proposal: intp type
On Nov 12, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Talin wrote: > > Well, as far as intp goes (or iptr if you prefer - the naming > convention in LLVM is i<size>) How about "intptr". > here's what I would expect: > General rule #1: If an instruction accepts both i32 and i64, then it > should accept iptr as well. If it only accepts i32, then it can > continue to only
2014 Sep 08
1
possible deadcodes in sources
Hello, we've run a coverity scan on the openssh sources and it found several issues. Although the scan was run on patched rhel sources, some results are applicable to vanilla sources too. * servconf.c:1458:dead_error_line ? Execution cannot reach this statement "*intptr = *intptr + 1;" --- a/servconf.c +++ b/servconf.c @@ -1451,12 +1451,8 @@