Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Speex support for TI DaVinci processor"
2006 Dec 05
1
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
Jerry,
Thanks for the response; basically, I need to get just the narrow band working now (maybe use advanced features such as jitter buffer, echo cancellation, VAD, etc in the future); the DSP
will do the encode and decode simultaneously as data are available. My main objective is just do a voice application that runs on the ARM side of the DaVinci with the codec running on the DSP side; the
2006 Dec 05
2
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
Hi,
My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working on the TMS320C64+ DSP in the DaVinci chip. I
2007 Jan 04
3
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
Thanks Jean-Marc. Is there a Speex trunk for the C64xx I can use? Or do I have to figure what options
to turn on (in configure) when building the library? Thanks.
Regards,
Andy Ngo
----- Original Message ----
From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca>
To: ndno72-speex@yahoo.com
Cc: jtrantow@ieee.org; speex-dev@xiph.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 2:52:02 PM
Subject:
2007 Jan 04
0
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
Andy Ngo wrote:
> Thanks Jean-Marc. Is there a Speex trunk for the C64xx I can use? Or
> do I have to figure what options
> to turn on (in configure) when building the library? Thanks.
Support is in the main version. Just look at the TI/ directory for extra
TI-related stuff.
Jean-Marc
> Regards,
> Andy Ngo
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jean-Marc Valin
2006 Dec 05
0
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
Do you need to encode and/or decode? I did some work optimizing the DM642
speex 1.1.11.1 encoder earlier this year. I was able to reduce the narrow
band MIPS from approx 30 to 16 using some of the #pragmas and optimizing the
functions (Following the BlackFin example.) The project I was working on
has been put on hold so I haven't looked at the more recent changes. If you
are tight on
2007 Dec 12
1
4kbps sounds robotic on TMS320C64
Tried your fixed_generic.h change but that didn't help.
Andy
----- Original Message ----
From: Andy Ngo <ndno72-speex@yahoo.com>
To: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca>
Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 4:13:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] 4kbps sounds robotic on TMS320C64
Jean-Marc,
Yes, fixed-point is enabled (#define FIXED_POINT in
2007 Dec 12
1
4kbps sounds robotic on TMS320C64
Hi,
I'm currently working on the TI DaVinci processor, which has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I have been using Speex 6kbps (narrowband, quality=2, complexity=1, perceptual_enh=0) on the DSP C64+ side without any issues; the voice sounds very good for such a low bandwidth requirement. However, recently, I tried out the 4kbps mode (changing quality to 1) on the DSP and it
2007 Jan 23
1
Re: Clicking noise using Speex built for TI C64+ DSP of DaVinci Processor
Hi Jean-Marc,
I have tested Speex in fixed-point mode on my PC without clicking noise. As I mentioned below, I tested Speex in fixed-point
mode running natively on the ARM side of the DaVinci without click noise. I only get the clicking noise when running Speex
on the DSP side. For the TI C64+ DSP on the DaVinci processor, the TI-specific switches doesn't do much other than
defining the
2007 Jan 22
1
Clicking noise using Speex built for TI C64+ DSP of DaVinci Processor
Hi,
I've been trying to get Speex to compile and run on the DSP of TI's new DaVinci System-On-Chip processor, which has both an ARM
(ARM926) and a DSP (C64+, based on the C6400). I used the latest code (1.2beta) and followed the example in the speex-
1.2beta1/ti/speex_C64_test trunk to build the Speex library for the DSP. Basically I have a loopback application on the ARM that
samples
2009 Jun 28
1
TI Davinci DM Serias
Hi, I am attempting to port the speex library to TI Davinci DM35x Family.
My questions are:
1. What is the best ./configure option for it? Is it ARM5e / ARM4 ?
when I tried these two the during the compiled a warning
"I suppose you can have a [ARM4/ARM5E/Blackfin] that has float
instructions?"
2. is there any available demos for the echo cancellation because I can get
it
2008 Mar 03
1
Speex requirements on a TI Davinci / ARM926EJ-Sid(wb)
(Resending since the archive seems to have eaten the text.)
I'm working on getting Speex running on a TI Davinci (6441), on both the
ARM and the DSP. My immediate goal is to understand the processing
requirements on different architectures so that I can properly specific
an engineering project.
I have it up and running on the ARM, and I just wanted to see if anyone
could sanity-check
2007 Dec 12
0
4kbps sounds robotic on TMS320C64
Jean-Marc,
Yes, fixed-point is enabled (#define FIXED_POINT in config.h). I haven't tried anything lower than 4kbps; like I mentioned, 6kbps sounds fine so it's very strange. The only code I changed to get 4kbps was setting quality to 1 so that is the only difference in my test code between using 4kbps and 6kbps.
It seems to be in the encoder. On the ARM side, I encoded a 8Khz 16-bit
2007 Jan 23
0
Re: Clicking noise using Speex built for TI C64+ DSP ofDaVinci Processor
Sorry everyone, but I figured it out; it's working now. The problem was in my monoToStereo and stereoToMono functions (the Linux OSS driver on the ARM
side only supports stereo so I had to convert it to mono before feeding it to Speex); also I had an alignment issue with my buffers I was using on the DSP
side. Thanks Jim/Jean-Marc for your help!
Regards,
Andy
----- Original Message ----
2006 Sep 06
1
Fileserver Issue
Am having difficulty in getting the fileserver part of puppet 0.18.4 on
centos 4 working fully in respect to %h / %H.
In file server.conf I have the following defined
[private]
path /var/lib/puppet/files/%h
allow *
In ''/var/lib/puppet/files/davinci/'' the source file
up2date.sources.centos(davinci being hostname).
And in manifiest have
file {
2019 Apr 15
2
SOLR/Index?
On 15.4.2019 3.33, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote:
> ?72% [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ doveadm search mailbox
> lists/freebsd/ports-commiters? body 'sysutils'
> [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ doveadm fts rescan
> [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ doveadm index -q
> lists/freebsd/ports-commiters
> ?64% [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ tail -f
2019 Apr 15
2
SOLR/Index?
On 15/04/2019 08:09, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote:
> Note the hits after the fts rescan/index.
>
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2019 12:55:07 AM
> *To:* Larry Rosenman; John Fawcett
2019 Apr 15
2
SOLR/Index?
On 15/04/2019 10:31, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote:
> It always shows the autoindex. And yes built from sources.? I'm the
> FreeBSD port maintainer for mail/docecot.? This has been happening for
> several releases.
>
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* dovecot
2006 Apr 17
2
How to create a compact Speex library
--- Jim Crichton <jim.crichton@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> > Sorry if this a repost but I want to create the
> >> > smallest Speex library possible to be put in
> TI's
> >> > TMS320 DSP. I'm only interested in one
> >> configuration:
> >> > 5.97 Kbps narrowband. What part of source code
> >> can I
> >> >
2019 Apr 15
2
SOLR/Index?
On 15/04/2019 01:39, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote:
>
> full solr.log at:
> https://www.lerctr.org/~ler/solr.log
>
> The search DOES make it to SOLR:
> ?77% [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] 130 $ grep sysutils
> /var/log/solr/solr.log
> 2019-04-14 18:31:34.749 INFO? (qtp349420578-7538) [? ?x:dovecot]
> o.a.s.c.S.Request [dovecot]? webapp=/solr path=/select
>
2004 Aug 06
2
Introduction...
I've been following this kist for a while now and I suppose I had better
introduce myself. This is going to be rather a long message, but that
can't be avoided.
My name is Andrew Baker and I work for a company called TeleDesign. We
are based in the UK.
http//www.teledesign.co.uk
I have lots of experience with telecomms, a fair bit with VoIP, quite a
bit (but rather less recent) with