similar to: Abuot the Bug of Speex 1.2beta1

I'm setting up a test server with a Digium TE122 and am getting the following error on the console, spewing as fast as it can. Does anyone have any idea what this error might be? [Oct 19 11:24:53] NOTICE[2076]: chan_dahdi.c:3108 my_handle_dchan_exception: PRI got event: Event 59 (59) on D-channel of span 2

Dear friends, I have asked last few days about cross-random effects using PQL, but I have not receive any answer because might my question was not clear. My question was about analysing the salamander mating data using PQL. This data contain cross-random effects for (male) and for (female). By opining MASS and lme library. I wrote this code sala.glmm <- glmmPQL(fixed=y~WSf*WSM,

In a "normal" frame that doesn't have in-band signalling (which nobody seems to use anyway), the frame starts with the narrowband information. If the frame is in wideband, then this will be followed by a bit of wideband information that starts with a bit set to 1 (narrowband starts with a bit set to 0). Have a look at what the Speex decoder does. You may actually want to have similar

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, lianghu xu wrote: > Hi Jean-Marc, > > I remember you said that the SDP tells the mode information. Right. But a decoder like speex can always be configured from information contained in the incoming stream. That makes your application more interroperable. Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP amsip - http://www.antisip.com osip2 - http://www.osip.org eXosip2 -

I'm writing a network monitoring script, that has to traverse a bunch of firewalls (joy ...) and so for connectivity tests, I'm using ssh (OpenSSH 2.x). I'm being lazy, and trying to avoid parallel tasks/threading, so I'm interested in reducing the amount of time OpenSSH will wait to connect to something before giving up. I've already set the ConnectionAttempts flag to 1,

Hello, speexers. I'm new to the list and new to audio compression. I've been asked to look into creating a digital archive of 20-minute speeches (sermons) and speex seems to be what I need. My experience is in image compression; I shepherded gzip, deflate, zlib, and png through the IETF process, put "image/png" through the IANA registration process, and I maintain several

I previously posted this to the linux.samba mailing list. I'm not sure that was the right place, so here it is again. Apologies if you've already seen it. Hi, I would really appreciate any hep with a big problm I'm having with XP (Pro / SP1 ) transferring to a samba share. The transfer starts off OK, using about 66% of my 100Mbs network. Then, after about 10-15 seconds, it drops off

Dear all Why isn'it possible to calculate Mahalanobis distances with R for a matrix with 1 row (observations) more than the number of columns (variables)? > mydata <- matrix(runif(12,-5,5), 4, 3) > mahalanobis(x=mydata, center=apply(mydata,2,mean), cov=var(mydata)) [1] 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 > mydata <- matrix(runif(420,-5,5), 21, 20) > mahalanobis(x=mydata,

I have written a program which uses libspeex. Now i have tried to use the new version (1.2beta1), but when I try to compile with the new version of libspeex.lib and new h files, with Visual Studio .NET 2003, I get this error: fatal error LNK1262: link failed due to mismatched versions of 'C:\Programmi\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003\Vc7\bin\c2.dll' and LINK.EXE Could someone help?

Hi all Speexers, I've done some optimization to current SVN fixed-point on ARM9E platform. If the RVDS simulator gives the MCPS(Million Cycle Per Second) value A, then actual MCPS on real CPU will be around 2*A. I don't know what cause the big gap between the simulator and real CPU. What do you think? BR, Lianghu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Dear Speexers :-) I am trying to change the frame size from 20 ms to 10 ms, I did that by changing the value of the frame_size from 160 samples, to 80 samples in the sampleenc.c file. The number of frames increased as expected, but the size of the encoded stream of each frame remain the same! For example, if I use quality mode # 8 (corresponds to 15 kbps), the encoded streams size in bytes equals

Is there a way to turn sessions off in Rails? Doesn''t appear to be. Also, is there any garbage collection for stale sessions? On those two topics, are there any problems with Rails handling those options? I ask because it seems like something that would have been included. If there is no technical reason why it wasn''t included, then I''ll create/submit a source

Hi Craig, Thank you very much for your answer. I did not want to discuss exactly the semantic and name of one operation but instead raise the question "would it be beneficial to have more vector builtins?". You wrote that the compiler will recognize a pattern and replace it by __builtin_ia32_haddps when possible, but how can I be sure of that? I would have to disassemble the generated

Hi, I love llvm vectors, yet I wonder why some advanced vector operations are specific to some CPU targets? Let me take an example: /// Horizontally adds the adjacent pairs of values contained in two /// 128-bit vectors of [4 x float]. /// /// \headerfile <x86intrin.h> /// /// This intrinsic corresponds to the <c> VHADDPS </c> instruction. /// /// \param __a /// A

Hello, has anyone seen or created a Debian Sarge package for 1.2beta1? I saw some for Sid, but I prefer not upgrading glibc right now, as this is a production server (Asterisk on it will be for testing). Thanks, Juraj.

Hello, first of all, sorry for the joke in the subject ;-) I have successfully update the speex library my software was using from 1.1.12 to 1.2beta1 (1.1.13). It is a VoIP software, where i set preprocessor VAD on and use the result of speex_preprocess() to determine if there is voice activity. I must say that it works fine...since i have update to the new version. Ive been testing, and

You may have triggered an instability problem. Can you upload your files somewhere so I can have a look at them? Jean-Marc Andras Kadinger a ?crit : > Greetings everyone, > > I was about to compare AEC performance between 1.1.12 and 1.2beta1 when > I noticed something. > > If I configure (and compile) speex-1.1.12 with > > ./configure --enable-shared=no

Can you first try the svn version (or apply https://trac.xiph.org/changeset/11882). As I mentioned in a previous email, there's a bad bug in the 1.2beta1 echo canceller. Jean-Marc Coffey, Michael a ?crit : > Hi Folks, > > I am having trouble using speex_echo_cancel. As a starting point, I am > using the testecho.c source code. I compiled the 1.2beta1 version. I > have not

> I will want to use this with a 16K sample rate. Is it expected to > work well with just another slight patch, or will we need to modify > it more deeply? Just use SPEEX_ECHO_GET_SAMPLING_RATE to let the aec know what sampling rate you're using (default is 8000). > Also, are there any tunable parameters besides tail length? I am > wondering about the aggressiveness of

In bits.c\speex_bits_pack there is logic to reallocate the bits buffer. In that section there is a call to speex_memset_bytes which appears to wipe out all the old bytes. I found when I encoded a multi-frame message that needed less than the default 2000 bytes for bits->chars, everything worked fine. However, when I encoded a longer message that triggered the realloc code in speex_bits_pack,