similar to: Denoiser level and AEC problem

Hello, The denoiser was good with a car noise or a raod noise before the r11739. But for some situation, the actual version is perfect. That's why I think that if we can adjust the agressivity of the denoiser, we can respond to all of the situations. Maybe two parameters should be enough : high or low. For the AEC, I have to test with older versions because it's another person that

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> 1. What is the point in multiplying a codebook index with some number >> ant adding a loop variable to it as done in the exc unquant function. >> for (j=0;j<subvect_size;j++) >> exc[subvect_size*i+j]+=s*0.03125*shape_cb[ind[i]*subvect_size+j]; > > That's just how you represent a 2D array in C: the codebook has

Ouss a ?crit : > Hello, > > Is it possible to adjust the level of the denoiser ? Not for now. > In an old beta, before you change the aggressiveness of the denoiser, it > works very well with the noise of a car, a road etc... but not now. When did that change? > The AEC too works very well in a old beta, but now, I think there is a > problem... When did that change?

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Well, you could change the order in the encoder as long as you reverse > it in the decoder as well. Ok, I see that in the split_cb_shape_sign_unquant function, that each coefficient is tied to it's position in the nb_subvect exc coefficients. Honestly, I have problems understanding what exactly the codebook search works like. If you have the time to to

How about this: the codebook search gives you the N best (in order) combinations of entries for the current sub-frame. You can simply compute a one-bit checksum on all the codebook entries and choose which of the N-best to use based on that and the "message" you have. Of course, there will be cases where all of the N-best match to the same checksum, but that's what error-correcting

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Not sure I understand your question. Change the order of what within what? In cb_search, we iterate nb_subvect times over a codebook, finding nb_subvect codebook entries to quantize the excitation signal. After finding these nb_subvect codebook entries, they're written into the stream: /*save indices*/ for (i=0;i<nb_subvect;i++) {

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > How about this: the codebook search gives you the N best (in order) > combinations of entries for the current sub-frame. You can simply > compute a one-bit checksum on all the codebook entries and choose > which of the N-best to use based on that and the "message" you have. So you're suggesting, I can either write into the stream: -

> 1. What is the point in multiplying a codebook index with some number > ant adding a loop variable to it as done in the exc unquant function. > for (j=0;j<subvect_size;j++) > exc[subvect_size*i+j]+=s*0.03125*shape_cb[ind[i]*subvect_size+j]; That's just how you represent a 2D array in C: the codebook has shape_cb_size entries and subvect_size samples per

Hello, I recently measured the distances ndist[0][nb_subvect-1] which are used to make the decicion, which codebook entries are to be used in libspeex/cb_search.c (function split_cb_search_shape_sign). For that I took a couple of audio books (all german speech), downsampled the tracks to 8kHz and encoded them with "speexenc -n --bitrate 15000 ..." (I used svn revision 11825). Usually,

Hello, just to make sure I haven't gotten anything wrong: In cb_search.c (function split_cb_search_shape_sign) after all that searching nb_subvect CB entries are being written into the stream. These are all taken from the same codebook. If I wanted to, I could just change their order, couldn't I? Because important is only the linear combination of them all together, which I keep

Bj?rn, I would be very interested in looking at your data and the R file. Actually, I think a lot of people would. You might want to post it on a website... CB -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Bj?rn Thalheim Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 4:43 AM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: [Speex-dev] Distances in codebook

Hi, I am using speex 1.2beta2 on a 24bit DSP that has a severe program and data space limitations. I am only interested in the speex decoder for 11kbps narrowband implementation. I am using the following parameters and structures 160, /*frameSize*/ 40, /*subframeSize*/ 10, /*lpcSize*/ 17, /*pitchStart*/ 144, /*pitchEnd*/ /* 11 kbps medium bit-rate

Hi, I am bring SPEEX up on Analog Device's Blackfin (using Visual DSP++ tool set). The floating point was too slow on this fixed-point processor so I am going for the integer version. The floating point library build was very clean, but when I build with FIXED_POINT defined, the compiler exits when it find this discrepancy in \libspeex\cb_search.c : ".\libspeex\cb_search.c",

Ok, I got a strange case.. I got a bugreport from a user about my application crashing on him. After a bit of trouble, I got him to report back the module and offset it crashed at (win32). I always retain a copy of my symbol files for my release builds, so tracking down the crash address leads to: (gdb) list *0x6d5c2213 0x6d5c2213 is in split_cb_search_shape_sign (cb_search.c:414). 409

I've never tried Speex on a 24-bit DSP, but I would suggest actually leaving the code (nearly) as-is. The scaling factors actually should not change because I'm using integer multiplications, not fractional multiplications. So what should happen is that the top 8 bits or 24-bit values and the top 16-bit of 48-bit values will be unused (filled with sign bits). There may be a few cases where

Hola. En mi caso, no he podido resolver los problemas con el Java para usar XLConnect, que en los papeles me parece el mejor. Supongo que algo de la arquitectura del sistema o bien de la relación entre el Java, el R y el RStudio. Así que utilizo library(openxlsx) write.xlsx(datos, file = "EDA1.xlsx") #donde datos es el objeto que quiero guardar. Requiere instalar el RTools, según tipo y

Hello, I do test runs of speex using speexenc -n [name].wav [name].spx The wav-files (6 different speech files) hereby are sampled at 44100Hz. Most interestingly, all Frames have SubModeID 5. I haven't tracked the Assignment of the SubModeID through the source code, so I just wanted to ask, if I can assume "speexenc -n" to use SubModeID 5 always? Ciao, Bj?rn -- You will

Since r12660, the speex_jitter_get with high latency doesn?t works, I have no sound. Before this release, the speex_jitter_get works in all conditions. speex_jitter_get return void, then I cannot know the reason of this problem. Regards Ouss -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca] Sent: dimanche 18 mars 2007 23:07 To: Ouss Cc:

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> I haven't tracked the Assignment of the SubModeID through the source >> code, so I just wanted to ask, if I can assume "speexenc -n" to use >> SubModeID 5 always? > > Only if you never change the bit-rate. But speexenc -n was a dumb idea > in the first place... I know ... Thats why I downsampled the WAV-File to 8kHz (I got

Hello, I have the following structure: model foo has_many :bars:, :dependent => true end model bar belongs_to :foo end In my action, when i try to save foo: def save begin f = foo.new f.a = 5 begin b = bar.new b.a = 10 f.bars << b rescue Exception => exc ... end f.save! <-- This does not happen