similar to: echo canceller in win32

? ? Hi Jean-Marc, When speech is played in speaker, we are feeding that speech to echo canceller for cancelling its echo from captured data and the echo canceller work very well. But when there is no speech, we are feeding samples of value zero to speaker and the same to echo canceller. But microphone is always capturing something. But when speech is played again after these zeros(silent

I am using 'portaudio' and 'speex' to implement a speech audio capture/playback. Preprocess works fine but not the echo canceller (associated with preprocessor). I have read 'testecho.c' but it didn't help me. What I am doing bad? This is my implementation: One thread to capture and playback, both are different functions called in different times directly from

Hi Jean-Marc, I am developing a voice chat for win32 using speex,when I do echo cancellation, after 2 seconds adaptation, the echo canceller work very well,but after process silent(zero) echo signal(when enabled VAD,DTX),it work very bad,I have to reset it, it seems adapt faster then do not rest it, so I always here echo produce by my fisrt two second speech,how can I solve this problem?

Hi, Is there any win32 echo canceller demo with source code,speex echo canceller is very good,but with real net stream,it seems not work, it seems many people has this problem.Thanks a lot. Best regards Yong Chen admin@seeyoucn.com

speex-dev How can I user echo canceller with real time net stream,when I test it with file,it's very good,but when I use it in my voice chat,it is not work,is there some working demo like GIPS? best regards Yong Chen szcj23@tom.com

(from thread Re: [Speex-dev] Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP, but this is a more general topic) >> With these changes, the link was successful, using testecho.c with some >> modifications for the C55 environment. The code and data memory >> requirements were a lot more than I had hoped (>20kbytes of dynamic data >> memory for block size=128, tail length = 1024),

Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for the suggesting. I tried the test wtih my recording file offline through the testecho. I got the same result(no prepocessor echo suppression) as my recording file for that live call. Basically I don't see the difference between input_frame and output_frame. As I mentioned in my original post, the echo return loss is about 20db. I guess the echo cancelleris not really

It seems like the firefox 2.0 not quite works with hotmail... I am reposting my message again with IE for easy readability. Sorry about mess. Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for the suggesting. I tried the test wtih my recording file offline through the testecho. I got the same result(no prepocessor echo suppression) as my recording file for that live call. Basically I don't see the difference

All, Wonder why all my posts has no line breaker when it displayed the forum... I used Hotmail(Windows Live Mail) with FireFox 2.0. I am posting this msg with IE 7.0 and see if it make any difference. Anybody experienced the same issue and how to workaround it? Thanks a lot! Regards, William From: espzzh@hotmail.comTo: jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.caCC: speex-dev@xiph.orgSubject: RE:

Jean-Marc, I recently started looking at running the echo canceller on a TI C55 DSP along with the 8kbps narrowband Speex encoder/decoder. This is one of those "braindead compilers" that you refer to from time to time, and cannot handle the float struct assignments in the return statements in pseudofloat.h. Most of these were eliminated in build 11311 (patch by Brian Retford), but

Can you first try the svn version (or apply https://trac.xiph.org/changeset/11882). As I mentioned in a previous email, there's a bad bug in the 1.2beta1 echo canceller. Jean-Marc Coffey, Michael a ?crit : > Hi Folks, > > I am having trouble using speex_echo_cancel. As a starting point, I am > using the testecho.c source code. I compiled the 1.2beta1 version. I > have not

> I've just been made aware of these problems (look for the thread "speex > echo cancellation limitations"). It's on my short-term TODO list. I saw the other thread, my problems happened in different (but similar) routines. >> If fftwrap.c, I ifdefed out the spx_fft_float and spx_ifft_float >> routines, >> because there were not used and required

Terrific! The patch fixes my problem quite decisively. I will want to use this with a 16K sample rate. Is it expected to work well with just another slight patch, or will we need to modify it more deeply? Also, are there any tunable parameters besides tail length? I am wondering about the aggressiveness of adaptation and I know you are an expert in that area. Thanks so much, Michael

Hi! I want to use speex for echo cancellation in my program, but I have bad results. I will explain what my program does. it is a client-server application. I run a server in room A and a client in room B. the client sends some voice to the server and the server plays it on loudspeakers. I run another server in room B and connects to it from room A using the same application that runs

>Just tried your files and I'm not running into any infinite loops and >the cancellation works fine. Unless the C6x has the same problem, I >suspect a 16-bit problem. I'll check and see if I find something. About >the r=0 problem, I can't find where it ends up in a denominator, so I >suspect is not (directly) the problem. I built and ran the same test on the TI C64

Hi I have tested echo cancellation using some different examples. TEST 1. First, I record my voice, named TestVoice1. Then I perform testecho using TestVoice1 as the data of both mic and speaker. Final, I get a ideal result after modified the parameters for several times. It means the output is almost silent. I think this shows the echo cancellation can work. TEST 2. Then I edit the TestVoice1

Jean-Marc, I have traced the second infinite loop further. When st->adapted becomes true (mdf.c line 623), the first Yf[i] value is 4, the leak_estimate is 0xd4e, the resulting r is 3. The first value in st->Rf is 0, so e is 1, and r is set to e>>1, or 0. A little later there is a divide by r, and there is the hang. It seems that the 0 in Rf[0] is the problem, but I am not

Jean-Marc, Well I finally tracked down the problem. Then I checked my mail and found that you had fixed it several hours earlier. :( Build 11387 produces the same result as my modified build 11343. Because of compiler limitations in the TI tools, I did have to make modifications to pseudofloat.h (separating return of float values) and nb_celp.c (adding braces around a variable declaration

Hi, I wanted to play around with the echo canceller so I tried the testecho program. As speaker sound I fed it with a 440 Hz sine wave, and as mic with a 550 Hz + 440 Hz sine waves sound (but the 440 Hz component half the amplitude). I kind of expected to get a somewhat clean 550 Hz sine out, but it doesn't seem to work that way. Are there better samples I can use with testecho to see

Hi Folks, I am having trouble using speex_echo_cancel. As a starting point, I am using the testecho.c source code. I compiled the 1.2beta1 version. I have not tried any other versions of speex. The document says that the order of arguments to Speex_echo_cancel is (echo_state, input_frame, echo_frame, output_frame, residue) where "input_frame" is as captured from mic and