similar to: Library split (poll)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Library split (poll)"

2006 Jun 28
1
Library split (poll)
Hi Jean Marc, On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: > good idea to split the libraries > > If e.g. AEC/Jitterbuffer can be used with other codecs such as G711, > without linking to the speexcodec lib, I think people will reuse the > Speex jitterbuffer implentation and avoid writing their own. > > what about: > > libspeexpreproc Preprocessor >
2006 Jun 27
3
Windows Mobile build, memory allocation
I have sent the visual studio project files that compile the speex client to jean-marc directly (as an attachment), sometime this week, I will also upload the binary builds of static library files to my site www.phonestack.com. I am porting our LTP (lightweight telephony protocol) to some embedded systems. I require to run speex in an environment that doesn't support memory allocations. How
2007 Oct 11
2
Library split to be merged -- looking for a name
Hi everyone, Judging from the lack of complaints about the split, I think I can go safely forward with that. The only thing to decide is the name of the new library that will contain the preprocessor, the AEC, jitter buffer, and resampler. So far, I've got a few potential names: - libspeaks - libspeexproc - libspeexvoip - libspeech - libspoke Let me know (in private so as to not flood the
2007 Sep 17
3
Libspeex splitting attempt
Hi, A while ago I mentioned I was considering splitting libspeex into two parts. I'm attaching a patch that does exactly that, but I haven't applied it to svn because I first want to have some feedback. That patch leaves the codec in libspeex and moves the other stuff (jitter buffer, AEC, preprocessor, ...) to libspeexvoip (I'm open to suggestions on better names). Some of the things
2007 Dec 06
2
Some question about speexcodex 1.2 beta2 on linux
Hi, I am an user of speex codec.Can I ask some question about the speexcodec 1.2beta2 on installed to linux(fedora 6) thanks! After I downloaded the latest version of codec then I type the commands to install : configure -prefix=/home/...../test -enable-shared -enable-static make make install then I try to compile my encode.c here is the encode.c of mine: =====================================
2009 Aug 11
2
AEC troubleshooting
I actually forgot to mention that I'm using ultra-wideband mode, but seems like you understood that anyway. Is this true that Speex echo cancellation only performs well in narrowband mode !? I've been using 100 ms as the default tail length. I don't know what the ideal tail length would be. I have tried shorter and longer tails but it hasn't made any difference. Does
2006 Jun 27
0
Re: Windows Mobile build, memory allocation
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 11:34 +0530, Ashhar Farhan wrote: > I have sent the visual studio project files that compile the speex > client to jean-marc directly (as an attachment), sometime this week, I > will also upload the binary builds of static library files to my site > www.phonestack.com. Actually, Zen (illi on IRC) is the one handling the Windows stuff. I can't do anything with
2006 Jun 29
0
Re: Library Split Poll
I vote for splitting 'em off and documenting the great features of each. I've been using the codec for a while now and would be more likely to dig in to the additional features if they were offered as separate components so I could use them with other audio projects (as well as being more likely to use those features in speex, simply because they would be easier to dig in to at
2007 Dec 04
3
speex/aec and vad
Hi Aymeric, > 2 questions: I count 4 :-) > * Do you "feel" that the current svn is enough stable Yes. I'm planning on releasing it as 1.2beta3 this week. Even in normal time, I try to keep svn in good shape so it is almost always better than the last release. And even when it breaks, Speex bugs tend to be very obvious and easy to reproduce (no segfaults that happen once a
2007 Feb 13
1
Re: Speex-dev Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
Hi All, I am trying to cross compile speex-1.1.12 to powerpc-405, i get a error after the make, speexec.lo error, please help me how to get rid of this error. On 2/9/07, speex-dev-request@xiph.org <speex-dev-request@xiph.org> wrote: > Send Speex-dev mailing list submissions to > speex-dev@xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >
2009 Aug 11
2
AEC troubleshooting
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090811/ad615b2a/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: comunip.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1663 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090811/ad615b2a/attachment.gif
2004 Aug 06
1
openh323 conflict; can speex_encode take short?
openh323 speexcodec.cxx has: BOOL SpeexCodec::EncodeFrame(BYTE * buffer, unsigned & length) { // convert PCM to float float floatData[SAMPLES_PER_FRAME]; PINDEX i; for (i = 0; i < SAMPLES_PER_FRAME; i++) floatData[i] = sampleBuffer[i]; // encode PCM data in sampleBuffer to buffer speex_bits_reset(bits); speex_encode(coder_state, floatData, bits);
2010 Mar 15
5
AEC strangest behavior
If more than one speaker receives the *same* signal, it doesn't matter the number of speakers. It only gets tricky when the speakers are playing slightly different signals (e.g. from a stereo song). Jean-Marc Quoting Greger Burman <greger at mobile-robotics.com>: > One thing I can think of is if you are using two or more speakers. If the > speakers are not at the exact same
2008 May 30
1
trying to use latest but can't link now
Greetings. I just upgraded to the latest 1.2beta3 and now I get the following link error: unresolved external symbol speex_wb_mode. Using VS2005. If I put back the old libspeex.lib it compiles just fine, but I would like to upgrade to use the new AEC stuff if I can. My code looks like: enc_state = speex_encoder_init(&speex_wb_mode) ; Worked before the upgrade so did the API change?
2007 Dec 02
2
Optimised qmf_synth and iir_mem16
Hi all, I've taken preglows ARM versions of qmf_synth and iir_mem16 from rockboxes speex codec, and tweaked them a bit further for some more speed. I attach them here so you can review and take on any changes you want. Please let me know if you have questions etc. Thanks, Robin -- Robin Watts, Email: <mailto:Robin.Watts@wss.co.uk> Warm Silence Software, WWW:
2007 Jan 04
3
Speex support for TI DaVinci processor
Thanks Jean-Marc. Is there a Speex trunk for the C64xx I can use? Or do I have to figure what options to turn on (in configure) when building the library? Thanks. Regards, Andy Ngo ----- Original Message ---- From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> To: ndno72-speex@yahoo.com Cc: jtrantow@ieee.org; speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 2:52:02 PM Subject:
2005 Nov 29
2
mac compatable?
is there a dowload for mac users? __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
2006 Feb 09
2
Speex Command line, Changing the LPC order and modifying the codebook
>There's plenty of areas for improvements that don't require incompatible changes like this one. can u please tell me what do I do to make it more exact waveform coder for music rather than speech. I understand that its meant for speech, but I was just using it for music... I am interested in getting the residual as small as possible using speex. Can you please tell me the areas to
2011 Apr 12
4
Anyone knows how microsoft AEC can deal with mismatches between clocks of capture and render streams?
Hi all, We all know that mismatch between clocks of ADCs of far-end voice and near-end voice is not allowed in a time-domain or frequency-domain LMS based AEC system. It means that capture and render audio streams must be synchronized to a same sample rate. However, I found that this restriction is removed in microsoft AEC from Windows XP SP1. Anyone knows how microsoft AEC do it? This technology
2006 Aug 14
2
AEC on a TI C6x - has no effect
Hello all, I am attempting to integrate the AEC algorithm from Speex into an RTP-based voice-over-IP application. The application is supposed to operate on a TI C6412-based board, using Code Composer Studio for development. Everything seems to be working, but the problem is that there is no discernible difference in the output, whether the echo cancel function is called or not. Let me first