similar to: how to study the speex source code

Hi, So I got a crash on the following code: k1=SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k1); k2=SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k2); which in the newer codebase is: bw_lpc(SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k1), st->interp_qlpc, awk1, st->lpcSize); bw_lpc(SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k2), st->interp_qlpc, awk2, st->lpcSize); I am not sure if the newer code will have the same issue but the following check is

Hi Jean-Marc, Hi Jim, I have also seen some problems with the 1.1.8 release on the C55x. So far I have boiled down the issues to the following: 1) We need our own "fixed_xx.h" header file. I don't know why, and haven't had time to investigate, but there is a definite improvement when I use the attached fixed_c55x.h file which has turned all the maths into inline functions.

Building svn 10958 on amd64, gcc-4.1: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include -I.. -I/usr/include -O2 -fPIC -funswitch-loops -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -march=k8 -ftree-vectorize -pipe -mfpmath=sse -O3 -msse -MT filters.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/filters.Tpo -c filters.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/filters.o cc1: warning: command line option "-fvisibility-inlines-hidden" is

I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve here, but SSE and fixed-point are mutually exclusive. Jean-Marc On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 19:02 -0500, sean darcy wrote: > Building svn 10958 on amd64, gcc-4.1: > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include -I.. > -I/usr/include -O2 -fPIC -funswitch-loops -fvisibility-inlines-hidden > -march=k8 -ftree-vectorize

I'm trying to make a design decision between a TI 6416 or DM642 (fixed point) and 6713 (floating point) platform. The application is a 32 channel speech encoder. (CBR only, 8khz, 8kbps) To get a feel for the computational load, I am running 1 second (50 frames) of voice through the encoder. My profile of the 6416 indicates I'm at 27.4M cycles/channel. I need to get below 720Mhz/32

Hello! I'v downloaded speex lib 1.1.11.1. I am trying to port speex lib to Blackfin processor. I am using VisualDSP++ 4.0. If I am compiling source codes with using floating point everything ok. When I am compiling with FIXED_POINT defined everything's ok and code works about two times faster. But when I am defining BFIN_ASM I am getting several compiling errors in Blackfin assembler

Most asm statements clobber ASTAT bits (shifts, maxes, etc...) but do declare the register as clobbered. Same thing with CC in a few places. Some places make an attempt at clobbering some hardware loop registers, but it's very incomplete compared with how many asm statements actually use hardware loops. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> --- libspeex/bfin.h

Hi, I am using speex 1.2beta2 on a narrowband 16-bit, 8khz system that has a severe program space problem and will not fit speex in its normal operation. In an attempt to shrink speex I placed a breakpoint in every function and ran a decode and encode and removed the breakpoints that I hit. in the functions that had a breakpoint that I didn't hit I commented out those functions (as well as

I'm trying to get speex to encode a bit faster, mainly by rewriting a few functions in SSE and translating the GCC __asm__ to VC __asm. There's 2 functions I'm targeting, first is vq_nbest which consumes 40% of the time at high complexity and split_cb_search_shape_sign. Which consumes just over 30%. I've split out two functions from: cb_search_precompute_energy - loop at the

for the bits init I am using speex_bits_set_bit_buffer and I don't use the write to or read from because the data is already in the buffer I am reading from and I am writing to the final buffer so I don't need to move arrays around. what part is the vocoder part of the decode? Thanks for your help! -Mike >>> Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> 08/06/07

I'm glad to hear that my data size can be shrunk considerably, however I do not know the minimum values that I would set the static arrays to be. I hate to be a bother but could you tell me the minimum values for these arrays/structures in the state structure? Thanks! encode: stack winBuf excBuf swBuf lagWindow old_lsp old_qlsp mem_sp mem_sw mem_sw_whole mem_exc mem_exc2 pi_gain pitch

>What frequency is the ARM processor? The phone shows ARM720 no freq. I'm going to have to guess around 100 Mhz. I ran the same code on an XSCALE ARM 400 mhz. Toshiba e740. Runs about .33 -> .4x realtime. This is the using the generic fixed point defines. Around 5 times faster than I am seeing with the Orange SPV e100. I am using the 1.1.3 codebase. Thanks for taking the time to

Thank you, I really appreciate the help. -Mike >>> Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> 08/07/07 8:34 AM >>> Michael Jacobson a ?crit : > I'm glad to hear that my data size can be shrunk considerably, > however I do not know the minimum values that I would set the static > arrays to be. I hate to be a bother but could you tell me the >

Hello Jean-Marc >If you want to do it, I can show you >what functions (there are 2-3) to port. Otherwise I might do it >eventually, but it's not a top priority (there's already an SSE version >though). I would indeed like to know which functions can be used to improve K6-2 performance through 3DNow. Cheers Bjoern D. Rasmussen <p><p><p>>From: Jean-Marc

> There is a big difference between SSE and SSEFP. The SSEFP means > that the CPU supports the xmm registers. All Intel chips with SSE support > do, however no current 32 bit AMD chips support the XMM registers. They > will support the SSE instructions but not those registers. You are right > about the SSE2 not being used. I'm still not sure I get it. On an Athlon

Le jeu 15/01/2004 à 15:30, Daniel Vogel a écrit : > Unrelated, but please use SSE/MMX/... intrinsics on Windows instead of using > inline assembly so you also get the speed benefit on Win64. OK, so here's a first start. I've translated to intrinsics the asm I sent 1-2 days ago. The result is about 5% slower than the pure asm approach, so it's not too bad (SSE asm is 2x faster

Dear R-list, Does somebody know how can I read a HUGE data set using R? It is a hapmap data set (txt format) which is around 4GB. After read it, I need to delete some specific rows and columns. I'm running R 2.6.2 patched over XP SP2 using a 2.4 GHz Core 2-Duo processor and 4GB RAM. Any suggestion would be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Jorge [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Kemal, It sounds like you are doing something wrong. I strongly recommend that you profile your application to see exactly where the CPU time is being spent. AMD happens to have a nice profiler called CodeAnalyst that they give away for free. And it's plenty usable on Intel CPUs as well. http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_3604,00.html Make sure you test a

I tried to compress 160 samples of random garbage (range 0-500.f) at 4kbps and got a crash in nb_encode -> forced_pitch_quant because start was -858993460 (== ol_pitch). -- Daniel, Epic Games Inc. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org'

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <b></b>Hi,<br> <br> I also tried to build speex