Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "A minor patch to spec file"
2006 May 10
0
A minor patch to spec file
Actually, in all the examples I've seen, people are using "Copyright"
and not "License". Any reference for the change you're proposing? Also,
pcm_wrapper.h is gone in svn, so it's a non-issue now.
Jean-Marc
Le mercredi 10 mai 2006 ? 11:06 +0200, Stepan Kasal a ?crit :
> Hello,
> in order to compile sppex on my Fedora, I had to do the following
>
2018 Mar 12
3
Bug report: override stopifnot() ?
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 09:30:59AM -0700, William Dunlap wrote:
> Why don't you use
> stopifnot( all(m1 == m2) )
> ?
good question. Even though I use
aseert np.all(m1 == m2)
when working with NumPy, I got accustomed to the "handy shortcut"
that I can omit all() with R vectors and matrices.
Then I got trapped with the thing I reported.
On a second thought,
2018 Mar 12
0
Bug report: override stopifnot() ?
Please stop this line of queries/"suggestions/speculations and read the
relevant docs **carefully**.
For example, from ?"=="
"Note
Do not use == and != for tests, such as in if expressions, where you must
get a single TRUE or FALSE. Unless you are absolutely sure that nothing
unusual can happen, you should use the identical
2018 Mar 12
0
Bug report: override stopifnot() ?
Why don't you use
stopifnot( all(m1 == m2) )
?
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Stepan Kasal <kasal at ucw.cz> wrote:
> Hello,
> I stumbled over a problem:
> stopifnot(m1 == m2)
>
> It works with vector or matrix, but does not work for classes from Matrix
> package.
>
> In the source of stopifnot(), there is
2018 Mar 12
2
Bug report: override stopifnot() ?
Hello,
I stumbled over a problem:
stopifnot(m1 == m2)
It works with vector or matrix, but does not work for classes from Matrix package.
In the source of stopifnot(), there is all(m1 == m2) that would just work,
but there is also is.logical(m1 == m2) that id FALSE.
Would it be possible if Matrix package redefined stopifnot() ?
(If there is a bug tracking database for package Matrix, I would
2009 Nov 30
1
non-threaded perl no longer in .spec file
Hello,
I'm setting up a new server on 5.4 and noticed this in the perl.spec file:
* Mon Jul 21 2008 Stepan Kasal - 4:5.8.8-14.el5
- add two patches, which...
- Resolves: #435505, #431041
- remove %%define threading, the non-threading variant is not supported,
Related: 435376
That comment wasn't there when I set up a server on 5.2 a few months
back and the %define threading option
2006 Jan 19
1
Compile error (svn 10743)
Hi,
I've received svn 10743 revision.
But there are compile errors at three files with VS2005.
Please check these reports.
Sohn,
Platform system engineer.
=============================================================================
1. modes.c
- nb_mode_new()
SpeexNBMode * nb_mode;
nb_mode = (SpeexNBMode *) speex_alloc (sizeof (SpeexNBMode));
if (nb_mode == NULL) return NULL;
2012 Jan 22
1
Packaging GObject for Fedora (was: [rjones@fedoraproject.org: New upstream version 1.15.19.])
These are the changes I made to the spec file related to gobject
bindings and gobject introspection. TBH I wasn't sure how to properly
package this.
Rich.
diff --git a/libguestfs.spec b/libguestfs.spec
index 095a848..1b6e43d 100644
--- a/libguestfs.spec
+++ b/libguestfs.spec
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
Summary: Access and modify virtual machine disk images
Name: libguestfs
Epoch:
2006 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] Fedora Core 5 package
The rpm target was added after 1.8 was released so I guess you're not
using CVS version. I also made several changes to the spec file which
you might be interested in. The current version is attached.
Reid.
On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 21:02 +1200, David Kuestler wrote:
> There doesn't appear to be an rpm target in the Makefile.
> My spec file is derived from the included spec file
2015 Mar 24
2
error building php spec file
Hey all,
I'm attempting to build a spec file of php 5.6.7 - the latest stable -
into an rpm. And it's failing with this set of errors:
Processing files: php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64
warning: File listed twice: /etc/rc.d/init.d/php-fpm
error: Symlink points to BuildRoot: /usr/bin/phar ->
/home/bluethundr/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64/usr/bin/phar.phar
warning: File listed twice:
2005 Nov 24
2
FUSE/SSHFS RPM Packages.
Alle,
Does anyone know if there are any reputable repositories out there that
contain packages for fuse/sshfs?
Best Regards,
Camron
--
Camron W. Fox
Hilo Office
High Performance Computing Group
Fujitsu America, INC.
E-mail: cwfox at us.fujitsu.com
2014 Jan 03
1
Need help with spec file for Apache-2.4.7
I am trying to build an RPM for Apache-2.4.7-1 on Centos-6.5-i86_64. I am
using mock.
The are three build dependencies that I am trying to resolve. One,
mod_socache_dc / distcache, I have simply removed from the spec file. The
other two are arp and apr-utils. Since httpd-2.4.7 needs arp >= 1.4 I got the
two latter requirements from
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.4.7-deps.tar.bz2
2006 Aug 26
2
[LLVMdev] Fedora Core 5 package
There doesn't appear to be an rpm target in the Makefile.
My spec file is derived from the included spec file however it did not
honour the DESTDIR, hence the changes.
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 22:43 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 15:56 +1200, David Kuestler wrote:
> > I have built llvm as a Fedora Core 5 package :
> >
2006 Jan 19
0
Compile error (svn 10743)
Sorry.
First error file is not "modes.c" but "modes_noglobals.c".
________________________________
From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of ¼Õ½Â¿ø
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:40 AM
To: speex-dev@xiph.org
Subject: [Speex-dev] Compile error (svn 10743)
Hi,
I've received svn 10743 revision.
But there are compile errors at
2006 Aug 26
2
[LLVMdev] Fedora Core 5 package
Hi,
Is anyone working on getting LLVM into Fedora Extras? This would allow
anyone with FC-5 or greater to simply "yum install llvm" without any
other preparation.
If no one here is working on this, I can start the Fedora Extras new
package process, which should only take a few weeks to complete. LLVM
has been on my "planned packages" list for a while now.
Thanks,
Adam
2015 Mar 24
2
error building php spec file
Hi Ashish,
Which CentOS version you using?
> If it is CentOS 6 then instead of building it from source, you can use IUS
> repo which has latest php packages.
> Below is the link for the packages in IUS repo for CentOS 6.
> <http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/6/x86_64/repoview/>
>
I'm using CentOS 7. I'll check to see if I can get php version 5.6.7
2006 Apr 13
4
How to create a compact Speex library
--- Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca>
wrote:
> > Sorry if this a repost but I want to create the
> > smallest Speex library possible to be put in TI's
> > TMS320 DSP. I'm only interested in one
> configuration:
> > 5.97 Kbps narrowband. What part of source code
> can I
> > remove? Currently, when I compiled the version
>
2015 Mar 24
0
error building php spec file
Hi.
Which CentOS version you using?
If it is CentOS 6 then instead of building it from source, you can use IUS
repo which has latest php packages.
Below is the link for the packages in IUS repo for CentOS 6.
<http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/6/x86_64/repoview/>
--Regards
Ashishkumar S. Yadav
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Tim Dunphy <bluethundr at gmail.com>
2006 Apr 13
2
How to create a compact Speex library
Hi,
Sorry if this a repost but I want to create the
smallest Speex library possible to be put in TI's
TMS320 DSP. I'm only interested in one configuration:
5.97 Kbps narrowband. What part of source code can I
remove? Currently, when I compiled the version 1.1.12
libspeex.a library with the TI TMS320 and
Fixed-Integer options, I get around 522Kb. I would
like to reduce it to as small
2011 Oct 31
3
[LLVMdev] [LLVM, llvm-diff] Question about FunctionDifferenceEngine and DiffConsumer::printValue
Hi,
Please find the attached patch for review.
-Stepan.
John McCall wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Stepan Dyatkovskiy wrote:
>> I found next code when switch instruction differs:
>>
>> Engine.logf("right switch has extra case %r")<< CaseValue;
>>
>> Where CaseValue is a ConstantInt object. Looking how logf works I found
>> that it