similar to: DSP C5xx decode to pcm 16bit

> For encoding into and decoding from "raw Speex stream" (if you can call > it that), I suggest you start with the sampleenc.c and sampledec.c > example code in Appendix B of the Speex Manual. There is no such a thing as a "raw Speex format". Also, sampleenc.c and sampledec.c are good for learning how to use the API, but the compressed format shouldn't be used in

I have successfully DECODED speex on TI C5509: #define TESTENC_BYTES_PER_FRAME 20 /* 8kbps */ #define TESTENC_QUALITY 4 /* 8kbps */ I am trying to generate the files I need with speexenc.exe: speexenc -n --quality 4 -V male.wav male.spx But I can't decode the files on C5x. Yes, I have seen that speexenc.exe adds Ogg header and

Hi all, suppose I've got a vector y with some data (from a repeated measure design) observed given the conditions in f1 and f2. I've got a model with two unknown fix constants a and b which tries to predict y with respect to the values in f1 and f2. Here is an exsample # "data" y <- c(runif(10, -1,0), runif(10,0,1)) # f1 f1 <- rep(c(-1.4, 1.4), rep(10,2)) # f2 f2 <-

Dear list users How is it possible to visualise both a linear trend line and a quadratic trend line on a plot of two variables? Here my almost working exsample. data(Duncan) attach(Duncan) plot(prestige ~ income) abline(lm(prestige ~ income), col=2, lwd=2) Now I would like to add yet another trend line, but this time a quadratic one. So I have two trend lines. One linear trend line

I'm confused about the format of the PCM/WAV data for speex_encode & speex_decode speex_encode(enc_state, input_frame, &bits); In the manual, it says "input_frame is a (float *) pointing to the beginning of a speech frame" (for encode) But I've found that in speexenc.c and testenc.c, short* is used instead of float* So, isn't it signed 16 bit samples(if

Hi Jim, > Build 11169 in SVN works correctly. Good. I'll try not to forget the EXTEND32 from now on. > I have attached a zip file (renamed > .txt) with a patch to bits.c to make the byteswapping for TI DSPs > consistent. Seems like unzip can't read it. Either it's in an unknown format or the file got corrupted. Could simply send as multiple (uncompressed)

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >Hi Jamey, > >Really cool to see Speex being ported to the C55xx and I'd be glad to >integrate the changes required in Speex (and the style's fine with me). > > I have the encoder and decoder running now and have verified that the encoder is bit-exact wrt to the fixed-point code running on x86 for the same 30-second audio sample. Encode and

Hi all, I'm new to the group. I'm looking at the speex code with an eye towards maybe helping out with either codec optimization or fixed-point implementation, The SNR calculation in testenc.c and testenc_uwb.c doesn't make sense to me. The code is { float enoise=0, esig=0, snr; for (i=0;i<FRAME_SIZE;i++) {

Hi Jim, Actually, I don't see anything wrong with the internal structure having a different type than the interface, as long both types are big enough to hold the possible values (in this case 0 and 1). Though, as you pointed out, testenc needs to be fixed to use spx_int32_t instead of int. I'll change that. Jean-Marc Jim Crichton a ?crit : > st->highpass_enabled is typed

Greetings, I've just started porting speex to a TI C5509 DSP. It doesn't look like it's going to be too painful, but there are a couple of quirks about the C5x. 1) chars are 16 bits because memory addresses are for 16bit words 2) ints and short are also 16 bits (so sizeof(char) = sizeof(short) = sizeof(int) = 1) 3) the c5x is essentially big endian My plan is to change int and

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >>I have the encoder and decoder running now and have verified that the >>encoder is bit-exact wrt to the fixed-point code running on x86 for the >>same 30-second audio sample. Encode and decode together run in >>real-time for 8KHz data, complexity=3, on 120MHz C5509 when code and >>data are all in on-chip SRAM. I have not tested the

I submitted a version of testenc.c to this list MONTHS ago that fixed this problem. It uses a reconfigurable group delay. If you had given me cvs access I could've committed the changes myself. Anyway, the file is attached (again). Maybe this time you'll actually notice the email. Sorry if I seem a little short. It's just very annoying to put the time into learning and improving a

Hi everyone, I'm about to release version 1.2-beta1 (which I could have called 1.1.13), which includes many, many changes. It would help if everyone could give the svn version (http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/speex/) a try and see if it works fine. I'll check my email next week when I'm back from some vacations and if nothing bad has been reported, I'll make the release. Have fun,

> Ok, here is cleaned up and fixed version. > > * Function is named speex_get_num_frames() now and return > number of frames, as you suggested. > * WB layers sizes are taken from wb_skip_table[], while NB frame > sizes are calculated with speex_mode_query(). Looking better. Just make sure to remove the stuff that isn't C99-compatible (e.g. // comments). > I've

Hello, &nbsp; I have an OMAP5910 OSK board with C55 dsp and ARM9 processor. I just want to use speex as a simple application on the platform in order to check dsp's working well or not. &nbsp; First, I found speex's source codes include "ti/speex_C55_test" directory so I thought speex could run on my platform well. Second, I open "Code Composer

Speex 1.0.3 uses floats, but the unstable version 1.1.x uses short. Jean-Marc Le ven 16/04/2004 16:04, Kenji Chan a crit : > Im confused about the format of the PCM/WAV data for speex_encode & > speex_decode > > speex_encode(enc_state, input_frame, &bits); > > In the manual, it says input_frame is a (float *) pointing to the > beginning of a speech

Hi, I got this setup. analog phone (ext7) ---> analog pbx ----- (ext 6 analog) voicemodem (ext 3 asterisk) ---- ttyS0/asterisk ---- sipphones q1: I got the voicemodem to work, but oneway only. I can talk from my analog phone, to my sipphone, but not the other way ? I know it only suppose to works in half duplex, but nothing come TO the phone. q2:

Hi! I have already in an other post mentioned IBasic. But if I use tabs in IBasic and the word which comes after it is a internal command, so that it will be colered, in wine-20050930 it looks like that on the right side: http://user.web-gear.com/theuserbl/newwine.png I think using spaces works still very well. Only tabs for it makes this problem. An other thing (I don't know if it is

Hi, I have been using speex version 1.0.5 on a text-to-speech program. Recently I upgraded to version 1.2beta1 and noticed that the waveform the I got after encoding and decoding on the new versions (beta1,beta2) is much more different than the original than on version 1.0.5. I also ran a PESQ comparison test on 700 voice samples and got better results in the older version (I used quality 9, and

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:56 AM > To: St?phane Lesage > Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Blackfin port on Visual DSP, Michael Shatz ? Salut Jean-Marc, After 1 month busy on other projects, I can finally answer you: > Some things to check. Do you