similar to: Error in pcm_wrapper.c release 1.1.12

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Error in pcm_wrapper.c release 1.1.12"

2006 Jan 19
1
Compile error (svn 10743)
Hi, I've received svn 10743 revision. But there are compile errors at three files with VS2005. Please check these reports. Sohn, Platform system engineer. ============================================================================= 1. modes.c - nb_mode_new() SpeexNBMode * nb_mode; nb_mode = (SpeexNBMode *) speex_alloc (sizeof (SpeexNBMode)); if (nb_mode == NULL) return NULL;
2006 Jan 19
0
Compile error (svn 10743)
Sorry. First error file is not "modes.c" but "modes_noglobals.c". ________________________________ From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of ¼Õ½Â¿ø Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:40 AM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: [Speex-dev] Compile error (svn 10743) Hi, I've received svn 10743 revision. But there are compile errors at
2006 Apr 04
1
Error in pcm_wrapper.c release 1.1.12
> > Please, I need your help! > > I'm not able to compile.... > > > typedef struct { > > } PCMMode; > > It's wrong in pure C, there must be at least one field. Then just add int dummy. Actually, this code is pretty much useless at the moment, so you can simply remove it from the build and it'll work. > 2All: can't compile libspeex from trunk
2006 May 10
2
A minor patch to spec file
Hello, in order to compile sppex on my Fedora, I had to do the following changes. Please consider installing them to the main tree. Thanks for your work, Stepan Kasal --- /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/Speex.spec 2006-02-15 13:13:48.000000000 +0100 +++ /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/Speex.spec.new 2006-05-10 11:00:25.000000000 +0200 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %name Version: %ver Release: %rel -Copyright: BSD
2006 May 10
0
A minor patch to spec file
Actually, in all the examples I've seen, people are using "Copyright" and not "License". Any reference for the change you're proposing? Also, pcm_wrapper.h is gone in svn, so it's a non-issue now. Jean-Marc Le mercredi 10 mai 2006 ? 11:06 +0200, Stepan Kasal a ?crit : > Hello, > in order to compile sppex on my Fedora, I had to do the following >
2006 Apr 13
2
How to create a compact Speex library
Hi, Sorry if this a repost but I want to create the smallest Speex library possible to be put in TI's TMS320 DSP. I'm only interested in one configuration: 5.97 Kbps narrowband. What part of source code can I remove? Currently, when I compiled the version 1.1.12 libspeex.a library with the TI TMS320 and Fixed-Integer options, I get around 522Kb. I would like to reduce it to as small
2006 Apr 13
4
How to create a compact Speex library
--- Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > Sorry if this a repost but I want to create the > > smallest Speex library possible to be put in TI's > > TMS320 DSP. I'm only interested in one > configuration: > > 5.97 Kbps narrowband. What part of source code > can I > > remove? Currently, when I compiled the version >
2006 Apr 13
0
How to create a compact Speex library
> Sorry if this a repost but I want to create the > smallest Speex library possible to be put in TI's > TMS320 DSP. I'm only interested in one configuration: > 5.97 Kbps narrowband. What part of source code can I > remove? Currently, when I compiled the version 1.1.12 > libspeex.a library with the TI TMS320 and > Fixed-Integer options, I get around 522Kb. You mean
2006 Apr 14
0
How to create a compact Speex library
>> > Sorry if this a repost but I want to create the >> > smallest Speex library possible to be put in TI's >> > TMS320 DSP. I'm only interested in one >> configuration: >> > 5.97 Kbps narrowband. What part of source code >> can I >> > remove? Currently, when I compiled the version >> 1.1.12 >> > libspeex.a library
2006 Apr 17
2
How to create a compact Speex library
--- Jim Crichton <jim.crichton@comcast.net> wrote: > >> > Sorry if this a repost but I want to create the > >> > smallest Speex library possible to be put in > TI's > >> > TMS320 DSP. I'm only interested in one > >> configuration: > >> > 5.97 Kbps narrowband. What part of source code > >> can I > >> >
2003 Oct 28
2
Privilege separation
Hello! Please consider including the attached patch in the next release. It allows one to drop privilege separation code while building openssh by using '--disable-privsep' switch of configure script. If one doesn't use privilege separation at all, why don't simply allow him to drop privilege separation support completely? -- Sincerely Your, Dan. -------------- next part
2009 Jan 14
1
How to install wine-1.1.12 on Centos 5
yum install wine installs wine-1.0; Is there an RPM that can works for Centos 5?
2009 Jan 15
1
Fallout 3 wine 1.1.12.. installer hangs
Everything is working pretty nice on ubuntu 8.10, but I can't seem to get fallout 3 to even install. Followed instructions, but instead of manually compiling an older version of wine to run the game I just installed the latest version of wine. It starts installing but 1/10 of the progress bar under "installing games for windows live" the installer freezes. I've let it sit
2009 Jan 03
3
Subpixel font rendering in 1.1.12
The announcement for Wine 1.1.12 says that support for subpixel font rendering has been added. The question is, how can we use it? Is there a way to enable it globally (there's no such setting in winecfg).
2009 Jan 09
2
Wine 1.1.12 failed to compile on fedora 9
Compiling wine on fedora 9 does not work for me. The compilation ends with: menu.o: In function `test_menu_add_string': /home/wine/Downloads/wine-1.1.12/dlls/user32/tests/menu.c:601: undefined reference to `blah.15349' /usr/bin/ld: menu.o: relocation R_386_GOTOFF against undefined symbol `blah.15349' can not be used when making a shared object /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
2009 Jan 15
3
Assembler errors in interlocked.c 0.9.61/1.1.12
Hi. I've decided to do a regression test in order to find out what's wrong with Dreamfall (see AppDB), and that involves comparing releases 0.9.61 and 1.1.12 (reports have been "garbage" ever since 1.0.0, but with errors different from mine). However, when building for the first time, this error occurs: Code: ccache gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
2009 Jan 16
0
Don't use 1.1.12
1.1.12 had a couple major regressions affecting a huge number of apps: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708 Both are fixed in 1.1.13. Don't use 1.1.12, downgrade to 1.1.11, or use 1.1.13 (released today).
2006 Jun 22
0
New VICIDIAL astGUIclient Release: 1.1.12
Hello, We've released another update to our Asterisk GUI Client suite: 1.1.12 http://astguiclient.sourceforge.net/ The client suite runs on most modern web browsers on almost any GUI-capable operating system, and it includes the astGUIclient client-side web app which extends your phone's functionality and the VICIDIAL client-side web app inbound/outbound call center software suite. This
2009 Mar 12
0
1.1.12 release candidate
http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.1.12.rc.tar.gz I would have already released 1.1.12, but it needed the MAILBOXDIR change described below, and I'm slightly worried that it might have broken some special setup. So please test first and I'll release in v1.1.12 then in a few days. * Added :MAILBOXDIR= to mail_location to specify the root dir for mailboxes. dbox users should migrate to
2009 Mar 18
1
NFS-error with dovecot 1.1.12
Hello, I'm testing version 1.1.12 and occasionally there is Mar 18 14:40:44 imap2 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(xyz): nfs_flush_file_handle_cache_dir: rmdir(/home/xyz) failed: Device busy It seems that it is related to a crash of the previous imap process of that user. And it doesn't seem to cause any problems. So can it safely be ignored ? It is on Solaris 10. Index storage