similar to: Speex for sampling freq >48KHz

Hi, I have one doubt again, that is Vorbis use DCT/MDCT based algorithm and also use psychoacoustic model so this is lossy codec. And I dont think it ca regenerate a better matching waveform than speex. Then there comes FLAC which is the perfect answer to my question, I suppose. But my concern is this that FLAC use simple prediction algorithm and doesnt use any CELP based algo which could have

Hi, I chose speex initially because i had some work in VQ on speex i.e. modifying split VQ to GMM based parametric VQ and I thought If I train the GMM based VQ codebooks with audio signal and then do audio coding with speex, I probably get a better(smaller) residual signal even with speex. But I couldnt get that. I was trying to get a lossless bitstream by MUXing the speex-bitstream and the

Hi, another question on the same topic Speex resampler at 44.1kHz seems to be very CPU intensive on Android (even more than the Opus encoder) While Speex at 48kHz is just fine. I wonder any alternate solutions or ideas ? Improve it, look for alternate solution ... I am guessing the NEON optimization are still used for both, etc. On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at

Hi, is there any way to tell the decoder the output sampling Fz we want ? opus_decoder_create = Sampling rate of input signal (Hz) Considering this example (VoIP-out from WebRTC/RTP) MICROPHONE(44.1/48kHz) >> [encoder created at 48kHz but with internalSampleRate set to 8kHz]>> INTERNET >> [decoder(created with 48kHz)] >> 48kHz(?) >> G.711(8kHz) This leaves us with

>There's plenty of areas for improvements that don't require incompatible changes like this one. can u please tell me what do I do to make it more exact waveform coder for music rather than speech. I understand that its meant for speech, but I was just using it for music... I am interested in getting the residual as small as possible using speex. Can you please tell me the areas to

Is there a list somewhere of "standard" encoding rates? I know, for example, CDs are encoded at 44100, as is a lot of digital sound, but I've seen programs that specify different levels of quality (like radio, phone, tape, CD) and I'd like to know if there are some encoding rates that are accepted as standardized for recording at different levels of quality. If so, is there

You asked in the Vorbis list, but your text only mentions OGG. The codec commonly used in OGG containers that is limited to 48 khz is Opus. Maybe you are trying to use the wrong codec (i.e. Opus instead of Vorbis)? Using a 44.1 khz wav file, I was able to encode a 192 khz ogg-vorbis file with the following command: $ oggenc --resample 192000 input.wav Of course, if your original material is

> I have one doubt again, that is Vorbis use DCT/MDCT based algorithm > and also use psychoacoustic model so this is lossy codec. Speex is also a lossy codec. > And I dont think it ca regenerate a better matching waveform than > speex. At bit-rates above 32 kbps, Vorbis tends to produce better results than Speex, even for speech. The only advantages of Speex over Vorbis at these

At speex.org, I read that Speex is well-suited to internet audio streaming and audio books. However, I am having difficulty finding or creating audio-book-type material of acceptable audio quality vs file size. For the sake of comparison, look at the speex sample in Ubuntu's example-content_26_all.deb vs http://podcast.msnbc.com/audio/podcast/pd_mtp.mp3 The mp3 sounds ok, streams and seeks

That article is a bit too dismissive. I agree that one cannot hear the difference between 48KHz/16bit and 192KHz/24bit if you just transfer the data directly to the audio output device. As such, there is no good reason for Opus to support higher than 48KHz (especially since this is lossy compression, anyway). However, in general, that's not all you do with audio data. 192KHz is useful for

----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander Chemeris" <Alexander.Chemeris at sipez.com> To: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel at vb-audio.com> Cc: "Conrad Parker" <conrad at metadecks.org>; <speex-dev at xiph.org>; "Jean-Marc Valin" <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 11:31 PM Subject: Re:

hi,All, I want to know whether Opus has AEC features like Speex? Thanks 2012/10/17 <opus-request at xiph.org> > Send opus mailing list submissions to > opus at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Hi!, I wondering if It's possible to change 48khz sample rate limit?, I'm Planing to encode with OGG codec a audio signal but I need that OGG Encoder works with 192khz of sample rate. It's Possible? Any Suggestions?

Hi , I have read that it is posible to encode higher sample rates like 96 khz or 192khz? and the output is 48 khz, the resample is internally.? http://wiki.xiph.org/OpusFAQ But it is possible to encode? 44.1khz. It is resampled to 48khz or I have to make the resample by myself and then encode it with opus. thnx, arctor -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Hi! Excuse the delay, but I had to deal with a corrupted NTFS file system that ate many important files on an USB stick... The FLAC version of the original is almost 6MB and it can be downloaded slowly from this time-limited link: https://sbr5vjid0jgmce4q.myfritz.net:40262/nas/filelink.lua?id=0ba5a10529a6fe7b On the meaning of a logarithmic sweep: If you use foobar2000 and the

I am specifically using Celt Wideband (48kHz) over WiFi multicast that naturally leads to lost packets and am trying to minimize the impact to the audio. I implemented PLC but the audio it produces is robotic. Have I implemented PLC correctly? Checking the waveform it is using the previous received waveform to fill in a missing packet but not the full waveform so it has to repeat. Basically,

On 6/7/14, 1:55 AM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Actually... no! 24-bit can indeed be useful as extra margin and Opus > can actually represent even more dynamic range than 24-bit PCM. That's > not the case for 192 kHz. There's no "margin" that 192 kHz buys you > over 48 kHz. You can do as much linear filtering as you like, the > stuff above 20 kHz isn't going to

Greetings everyone, I was about to compare AEC performance between 1.1.12 and 1.2beta1 when I noticed something. If I configure (and compile) speex-1.1.12 with ./configure --enable-shared=no --enable-static=yes it compiles and works as expected: I can run a mic and speaker signal through testecho, it runs in a reasonable amount of time (about 23 secs for 3 minutes of audio) and I get back

Hi everyone, I've recently been making various changes to the way the modes work and the supported frame size. On new feature that may be of interest to some is that CELT should soon support changing the frame size dynamically within a stream. By that I mean varying the amount of audio (in time) transmitted at once, not the compressed size -- which has always been variable. That would

Hi all! I would like to use Ogg-Vorbis to encode a non audio waveform. My waveform is in .wav format, on 16 bit mono, with frequency range from 100Hz to 100MHz. It's about 100MB lenght. I need to compact it with lossy for net transfer. Is there something like this, already done, that can help me ?? How can I measure the distortion that Vorbis introduce? I'm sorry for my bad english.