similar to: ARM7 Speex decoder

Dear Jan My intention is to read a piece at time of an .ogg file (stored in and external Multimedia card) decompress it and render it on and LPC2000 DAC. Because I don't have enough RAM memory to load the complete ogg file, I must read only a piece of file at certain time, then decompress and render it, and repeat the previous process until the end of the file. The problem is that I don't

Dear All I ported the speex decoder in LPC2000 ARM7 family. Because I fetched the .ogg file from and external MMC card, I can only red a limited memory block 1) Can I decode only a block of a speex file at time ? /*Create a new decoder state in narrowband mode*/ state = speex_decoder_init(&speex_nb_mode); /*Set the perceptual enhancement on*/ tmp=1;

I saw in the anouncement for the upcoming Boston, MA conference that there will be demos of CentOS on an ARM7 system. I am wondering: does this mean that there is somewhere out there a build of some version of CentOS that might run on a Raspberry Pi (which has an ARM7 processor)? -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services

Hi Tom Thanks, just at the feasibility phase right now, so this sort of info is really useful. Memory/MHz values for the Tremor/Vorbis code seem to vary wildly - at least I could not find a consistent set of numbers after trawling through the discussion groups... Thanks John -----Original Message----- From: tom abcd [mailto:tom.abcd@gmail.com] Sent: 28 March 2006 16:34 To: Anderton, John

Hi all I'm looking in to using speex for an ARM7 based speech decode development (note we need the decode only). My hope is that we should be able to run the decoder (in wideband mode) real time on the ARM7 (40MHz) without any problems (the difficulty would be in the encode - but we plan to run that offline on a PC - so we should be OK). Can anyone confirm that this is the case please? Also

Hi Jean-Marc Thanks, >>>> I've never measured that, but it shouldn't take too much space, especially if you disable all the code (and possibly codebooks) that aren't used. so the 100kbyte ROM value quoted by Tom in his earlier mail should reduce if I cut out all the encoder code? Ta John -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin

Hi, I have read the decoding side performance on ARM7 or ARM9. Your comment is very useful for us on evaluating the possible usage of Speex on our ARM system. How about the encoding performance? In your article, you mentioned "optimization". What is it? Is it included the 1.1.6 release source codes? thanks, Jay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

On 06/22/2015 11:26 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > I saw in the anouncement for the upcoming Boston, MA conference that there > will be demos of CentOS on an ARM7 system. I am wondering: does this mean that > there is somewhere out there a build of some version of CentOS that might run > on a Raspberry Pi (which has an ARM7 processor)? > The Pi2 is armv7 .. the original pi is armv6.

Hi, I have the encoder running on an ARM7 at 66mHz and it takes about 2-times real-time to encode a monophonic pcm file. Both quality and complexity are set to 3. I am using the ADS 1.2 tool-chain which seems to optimize C pretty well. I cannot use the inline ARM assy code because the operations used are only available for the V5 and up core. I would be grateful for any thoughts or

2007/9/6, Brett Humphrey <directgumby@hotmail.com>: > > Hello, > Hi Brett, > I'm sorry if this is not the correct place to ask this question but what > I'm looking for is any data on the reality of Speex working on an ARM7 core? > I'm looking at doing a few diffrent projects where I will be using a proc > such as the LPC2378 with the ARM7TDMI-S core

Hello, I'm sorry if this is not the correct place to ask this question but what I'm looking for is any data on the reality of Speex working on an ARM7 core? I'm looking at doing a few diffrent projects where I will be using a proc such as the LPC2378 with the ARM7TDMI-S core running at 72Mhz (although errata show only 60Mhz is currenlty possible). Do you know if there is a port

I was trying to using llvm to targeting ARMv5TE -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180314/b9dadc37/attachment.html>

Hello I'm testing SPEEX on embedded board using ARM7 (Atmel). ARM7 don't have floating point so I'm using FIXED_POINT. Unfortunately the encoding speed is about 5 times slower then necessary for real time. ARM7 is slow for 16/8 bits operations. The sequence: static inline spx_word32_t compute_pitch_error(spx_word16_t *C, spx_word16_t *g, spx_word16_t pitch_control) {

Created a new thread because I screwed up and top-posted. So I am still stuck. For reference here is the smb.conf on the member server: root at florence:~# more /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] netbios name = FLORENCE security = ADS workgroup = IOL realm = IOL.SEAMANPAPER.COM <http://iol.seamanpaper.com/> log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level

I was able to run through all the C/C++ benchmarks in SPEC using LLVM. I'm on OS X 10.3.3. I did a quick comparison between LLVM (latest from CVS as of 4/27) and gcc 3.3 (Apple's build 20030304). For simplicity's sake, the only flag I used was -O3 for each compiler and I was using the C backend to generate native code for PPC. Most of the LLVM results were close to gcc

Greetings, Jeff Dickens! > Created a new thread because I screwed up and top-posted. > So I am still stuck. For reference here is the smb.conf on the member > server: > root at florence:~# more /etc/samba/smb.conf > [global] > netbios name = FLORENCE > security = ADS > workgroup = IOL > realm = IOL.SEAMANPAPER.COM

So I am still stuck. For reference here is the smb.conf on the member server: root at florence:~# more /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] netbios name = FLORENCE security = ADS workgroup = IOL realm = IOL.SEAMANPAPER.COM log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 1 dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab kerberos method = secrets and keytab

On 17/11/15 20:46, Jeff Dickens wrote: > indeed > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Rowland Penny > <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>> > wrote: > > On 17/11/15 20:28, Jeff Dickens wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Rowland Penny > <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com >

On 18/11/15 10:27, Jeff Dickens wrote: > > > On Nov 18, 2015 4:35 AM, "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com > <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 17/11/15 23:09, Jeff Dickens wrote: > >> > >> So I am still stuck. For reference here is the smb.conf on the > member server: > >> >

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Patrick Flanagan wrote: > I was able to run through all the C/C++ benchmarks in SPEC using LLVM. > I'm on OS X 10.3.3. I did a quick comparison between LLVM (latest from > CVS as of 4/27) and gcc 3.3 (Apple's build 20030304). For simplicity's > sake, the only flag I used was -O3 for each compiler and I was using > the C backend to generate native