similar to: Compiler warnings with GCC 3.4.4 and perfomance question on a Arm 7

Hi, I am bring SPEEX up on Analog Device's Blackfin (using Visual DSP++ tool set). The floating point was too slow on this fixed-point processor so I am going for the integer version. The floating point library build was very clean, but when I build with FIXED_POINT defined, the compiler exits when it find this discrepancy in \libspeex\cb_search.c : ".\libspeex\cb_search.c",

On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 10:15 -0500, tom abcd wrote: > I am using speex on a Philips LPC2138 Arm 7 processor and have hit two > compiler warnings when using FIXED_POINT and the Arm 4 asm code. > > In cb_search.c get a warning on the call to compute_weighted_codebook of: > "passing arg 2 of 'compute_weighted_codebook' from incompatible pointer type' OK, I forgot to

> OK, I forgot to update the ARM4 code. That should definitely be fixed > (otherwise it's not going to work). If this is not going to work then why does it work on my Arm? Any quick fix I can do for now? > > The second warning is in ltp_arm4.h in "pitch_xcorr(" getting a warning of: > > "matching constraint does not allow a register" on the "

Most asm statements clobber ASTAT bits (shifts, maxes, etc...) but do declare the register as clobbered. Same thing with CC in a few places. Some places make an attempt at clobbering some hardware loop registers, but it's very incomplete compared with how many asm statements actually use hardware loops. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> --- libspeex/bfin.h

Hi all, i'm using speex under symbian. When i have compiled the lib for ARM platform i have obtained the follow error: "Error: Can not represent OFFSET_IMM8 relocation in this object file format (1)" I have defined FIXED_POINT 1 and ARM4_ASM. The error is in the function forced_pitch_quant contained in ltp.c. The line that produce the error is:

hi, i am trying to compile a fixed point version of lipspeex on desktop windows environment. a short reason for the complicated story is that we need to keep the 'engine' part of our project same across the various ports of our voip project (blame the pointy haired boss). now, when i compile with FIXED_POINT defined in the Visual C++ 6.0, i get these errors:

Hi, here is a patch making the function compute_weighted_codebook a little bit faster. Not so impressive but avoid a loop and is really faster on small platforms like the MIPS I'm working on. Enjoy, Matthieu Poullet -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cwc_patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1226 bytes Desc: not available Url :

On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 10:33 -0500, tom abcd wrote: > > OK, I forgot to update the ARM4 code. That should definitely be fixed > > (otherwise it's not going to work). > > If this is not going to work then why does it work on my Arm? Any > quick fix I can do for now? Didn't you mention you were only using the decoder? That function is used in the encoder only. > is

The attached patch eliminates some warnings while compiling for ARM4 targets. It also simplifies the asm constraints a bit. Now we can use the ARM4 optimisations when compiling for PortalPlayer targets in Rockbox. Cheers, Dan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: speex_arm4.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 1550 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >Hi Jamey, > >Really cool to see Speex being ported to the C55xx and I'd be glad to >integrate the changes required in Speex (and the style's fine with me). > > I have the encoder and decoder running now and have verified that the encoder is bit-exact wrt to the fixed-point code running on x86 for the same 30-second audio sample. Encode and

Dear Valin, Please, can you explain me the mean of the routines' parameters: 1. void vq_nbest(); 2. static void compute_weighted_codebook(); 3. static inline void target_update(); 4. void split_cb_search_shape_sign(); 5. void split_cb_shape_sign_unquant(); 6. void noise_codebook_quant(); 7. void noise_codebook_unquant(); and what they do briefly??? It's very difficult understand a

Hi, when I compile with FIXED_DEBUG enabled, I get an error -- both when make tries to build testenc.o and when I try to link my app against the speex lib: lorenz@panelmaker:~/Blackfin/tests/speex_loopthrough$ make bfin-uclinux-gcc -c -g -I/home/lorenz/include -o main.o main.c bfin-uclinux-gcc -gl -elf2flt -L/home/lorenz/lib -o speex_through main.o -lspeex_debug -lspeexdsp -lm

Hi Jean-Marc, after some problems with getting svn to work here I finally made it. Problem is, you write that I cannot use libspeex and libspeexdsp at the same time now -- because I use a "live" system (mic-in -> speex_enc -> speex_dec -> headphone out) and I can run the AD1836 audio codec on 48 kHz only, I cannot use my program now (because I use speex resampling...) So I

I have at home two centos boxes: Box A - centos 6.4. gui version Box B - centos 7.1. minimal version. They are connected to 100Mb router (both boxes have 100Mb network adapters). Box B has software raid 1 and sata II interfaces.?On box B samba4 is installed and I copy files to samba share ( from box A to box B). Network monitor (iptraf-ng) shows only 20000 kbps of this copying operation. That is

Hello, Am 03.05.2015 um 17:38 schrieb ????????? ????????: > Thank you for your time. What network did you test it? > 100Mb or 1000Mb? I'm using 1Gbit here at home. With a 100Mbit connection it wouldn't be possible to reach transfer rates of 110MB/Sec. A realistic good transfer rate for a 100Mbit connection is just around 11 MB/Sec. Regards, Marc

Hello Developers, I am considering using SPEEX on an embedded processor that does not have a floating point unit. Does anybody have a SPEEX performance characterization on a fixed point processor? More specifically, I am interested in knowing how the MFLOPS values from Table 9.2 in the manual translate to fixed-point instructions when SPEEX is compiled with enable-fixed-point option. Any help

I ran the simple script bellow and received shoking results. It was complied for about 15 seconds !!! on modern Intel Core Duo computer. i=0; while(i<5000000) { i=i+1; } Using Visual Basic I can complete the same script (simple loop of 5000000 itterations) in 0.1 sec. Is it realy R not suitable for huge computing. -- View this message in context:

Hi winegurus! I am quite new to wine. :( I have winehq latest stable release installed. My os is Ubuntu lucid. My hardware: core 2 duo 2.3ghz, graphic card nvidia 220 gt with 1g , board assus p5kpl am in, 1g ram My nvidia has proper drivers installed and recognized by x I installed bricscad v9 for windows without any problems. Tip: Bricscad seems to run quicker when I select nt 3.5 or 4.0 on

Good afternoon. Performance problems when opening drawings Kompas V13/autocad 2010 with resource Samba. When simply copying speed 11.2MB / s. And to read and write to Samba. Next I mount resource Samba, as a network ROM for Windows 7 Pro x64. When opening a drawing for editing , there a large number of small requests . Kompas / autocad not cache the file, and read his blocks , often and quickly.

Hello, Am 03.05.2015 um 08:31 schrieb ????????? ????????: > Here my samba conf file: > > [global] > > workgroup = MYGROUP > server string = Samba Server Version %v > > interfaces = lo eth0 x.x.x.x/x #my ip and mask > hosts allow = 127. 10.0. > > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > > max log size = 50 > > security =