similar to: Noise reduction

This works really well for white noise reduction. However what I've noticed was the amplitudes of normal speech samples also get reduced. Is this something by design, or is there a way to automatically recover the original speech sample volumes ? <p>Thanks. <p>Tongbiao <p>-----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@hermes.usherb.ca] Sent:

Hello? My name is Hyeonwoo Oh. I?m developing video conference software using speex library. Can you give me some sample codes for acoustic echo canceller and noise reduction? I tried noise reduction API, but failed. Normal encode/decode API is working well. Thank you very much for your good job. I?m very pleased with speex. Best regards, Hyeonwoo Oh

Le dim 31/08/2003 à 20:12, Daniel Vogel a écrit : > > This works really well for white noise reduction. However > > what I've noticed was the amplitudes of normal speech samples > > also get reduced. > > Noticed this as well recently. This is probably due to the AGC (Adaptive Gain Control) that's integrated with the denoiser. I'll try adding an option to

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> I've had a small case with noise suppression and AGC. I have a fairly >> noisy environment here, and with the default parameters, noise >> suppression works fairly well while I talk. However, when I shut up, AGC >> starts slowly increasing the gain until it has amplified whatever noise >> is left to levels about equal to having no

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Cong, > > After reading the original RFC and this update, I'm still not entirely sure I understand the semantics of the flag you're proposing to add. Does it having something to do with the ordering of the reduction operations? The flag is only useful for vectorized reduction for now. I'll give

After some attempt to implement reduce-add in LLVM, I found out a easier way to detect reduce-add without introducing new IR operations. The basic idea is annotating phi node instead of add (so that it is easier to handle other reduction operations). In PHINode class, we can add a flag indicating if the phi node is a reduction one (the flag can be set in loop vectorizer for vectorized phi nodes).

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Xinliang David Li" <davidxl at google.com> > To: "Cong Hou" <congh at google.com> > Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 5:17:58 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Introducing a vector reduction add

Hi everyone, I'm currently working on a new function merging optimization that is more general than the current LLVM function merging optimization that works only on identical functions. I would like to know if the community has any interest in having a more powerful function merging optimization. ---- More Details ---- Up until now, I have been focusing on the quality of the code

Hi, I've had a small case with noise suppression and AGC. I have a fairly noisy environment here, and with the default parameters, noise suppression works fairly well while I talk. However, when I shut up, AGC starts slowly increasing the gain until it has amplified whatever noise is left to levels about equal to having no filtering at all. As soon as I talk, AGC backs down fairly quick

Hi, I have any Questions for data reduction. How is the data reduction reached, with Vorbis? ? Does the data reduction depend on the quantization noise, like MP3? ? ?Which data are then actually stored? ? Best greetings ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear Momchil, Thanks a lot for your prompt reply and kindly suggestion. The code will truly lead to some automatic unrolling with GCC and increase the number of operations in the assembly code. However, I am focus on the the IR optimization and the calculation of the array element offest, which may need multiplication if the IR instruction GEP is lowered to arithmetic operations. The

This may be commonly known but I haven't come across it so here goes, maybe it'll help someone: I have terrible echo with asterisk 1.2, zaptel 1.2.12, and a TDM400P with 1 FXS and two FXO modules. The Mark2 echo canceller with Aggressive turned on was the only setting that would make it acceptable. I found fxotune with this zaptel version to be broken. I pulled the latest fxotune.c

Hi Richard, Richard McGravie a ?crit : > We are looking for a consultant to assistance in the following areas. > 1. Shim in the pre filter from speex to all trunk interfaces in > asterisk. (E1, ISDN and FXO) > > 2. Optimize and improve the pre-filter for airplane noise floor. > Is this something you would be willing to assist us with or do you have > any contacts that could

Hi Hal, Because my function merging strategy is able to merge any two function, allowing for different CFGs, different parameters, etc. I am unable to use just a simple hash value to compare whether or not two functions are similar. Therefore, the idea is to have an infrastructure which allows me to compare whether or not two functions are similar without having traverse the two function

Hi Wei, Wei Mi wrote: > Sanjoy and Andy, thanks a lot for your suggestions. > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Trick<atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On Aug 23, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Sanjoy Das<sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Wei, >>> >>> I've not seen GCC's SCEV so I cannot

Renato, can you post a hand-created vectorized IR of how a reduction would work on your example? I don’t think that recognizing this as a reduction is going to get you far. A reduction is beneficial if the value reduced is only truly needed outside of a loop. This is not the case here (we are storing/loading from the pointer). Your example is something like WRITEPTR = phi i8* [ outsideval,

Hi When a reduction instruction is vectorized in a loop, it will be turned into an instruction with vector operands of the same operation type. This new instruction has a special property that can give us more flexibility during instruction selection later: this operation is valid as long as the reduction of all elements of the result vector is identical to the reduction of all elements of its

On 21 October 2013 17:29, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com>wrote: > I don’t think that recognizing this as a reduction is going to get you > far. A reduction is beneficial if the value reduced is only truly needed > outside of a loop. > This is not the case here (we are storing/loading from the pointer). > Hi Arnold, Nadav, Let me resurrect this discussion a

Hello, With high microphone gain, I seem to have problem making the silence detection work. The speech detection works well for the rare dish sample, which has very low noise amplitudes in silence regions. However, if the microphone gain is set to really high, noise samples are taken as speech, as indicated by the non-zero return value from speex_encode() calls. I had VAD turned on.

On Oct 23, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 23 October 2013 16:05, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote: > In the examples you gave there are no reduction variables in the loop vectorizer’s sense. But, they all have memory accesses that are strided. > > This is what I don't get. As far as I understood, a