similar to: Recommended GUI for Speex

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:19:17PM -0500, me@sbooth.org wrote: > Hi all, > > I have recently added Speex support to my app (http://sbooth.org/Max/) and > am in the process of creating a GUI for the user to control the codec > parametere. I am new to Speex and as such I am not really sure which > parameters are more important than others, and deserve prominent > placement,

Hi, Is there are document where the interaction between all the configuration options of speex is explained? Speex seems to have CBR, VBR and ABR. You can also use SPEEX_SET_QUALITY (SPEEX_SET_VBR_QUALITY) and SPEEX_SET_BITRATE which I suppose can't be set at the same time. Is there a list of possible combinations somewhere? I also have another question related to jitter. To minimize jitter,

I'm running a: for band in n w u do for quality in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 do for complexity in 3 do for vad in "" "--vad" do for dtx in "" "--dtx" do echo speexenc -${band} --quality ${quality} --comp ${complexity} ${vad} ${dtx} input.${band}.wav

Hi All, I've run into a small hiccup in encoding my audios with Speex. When I encode audience laughter and applause with 'speexenc' (version 1.0.1), the result is quite acceptable... until I enable VBR. Then it distorts horribly. My understanding of VBR is that it frees the encoder to vary the number of bits emitted to better maintain the quality requested, and so I would have

Hi, I am looking how to setup speex codec in codecs.conf for 8 Kbps and 6 Kbps. In config file are many parameters for setting. I don't know what is need to change for narrowbad like 8 Kbps and 6 kbps. Any suggestion? [speex] ;0-10 quality => 4 ;0-10 complexity => 4 ; true / false enhancement => true ; true / false vad => false ; true / false vbr => false ; 0 = off, otherwise,

Jean-Marc Valin (jean-marc.valin@hermes.usherb.ca) wrote: > > > I've been using Speex in my voice-over-IP program on Win32, in > > wideband (16kHz) mode. I just starting using VBR recently and > > have run into something that might be a problem within Speex: > > Are you turning on DTX in addition to VBR? Also, what version are you > using. As of 1.0, DTX is

Hello, I'm try to run speex on some ARM processor. I'd like to cut away some speex features including VBR, ABR and preprocessor while still supporting VAD/DTX. But I've found some puzzles in the source code regarding VAD as below, 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. Will VAD still work If I don't use the source file preprocess.c? 2)The speex manual

Hi Marc, Thanks for your quick response. So if VAD is enabled then VBR will be enable although it's a special VBR. How about take out the VAD code from the VBR and remove the code else? Lianghu On 10/24/06, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > > 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. > > Will VAD still work If I

Hi, I've been using Speex in my voice-over-IP program on Win32, in wideband (16kHz) mode. I just starting using VBR recently and have run into something that might be a problem within Speex: If someone hasn't spoken for a little while, and the bitrate drops to very low, sometimes the high half of the spectrum becomes frozen with a looping sound. The bottom half of the spectrum is

It would be very nice to know about some good success without too much cpu issues on Nokia devices, i tried pjsip.org project on S60 FP1 E65 +200mhz ARM cpu with speex but don't had much luck in using it without having 100% cpu usage :( Please let us to know about your testing E65 CPU: http://www.nokia-tuning.net/index.php?s=processor Fabio Pietrosanti Jordan Dimov wrote: > Thank

Hello, I am trying to use the DTX feature of speex to tell if the user is speaking. I have VBR, DTX and VAD turned on, but the function speex_encode always returns a non-zero value. It is my understanding that it should return a zero value when the encoder detects silence? Could anyone give me any clues to help figure out why this isn't working for me? I am using the 1.13 version of speex on

> All you say look normal to me. Okay, clarification requires less code to be written than a bug. :) > > Does that makes sense? I would have thought that --dtx alone would have = > doen it, > > but maybe it needs perfect digital silence to work? Or only uses the voi= > ce activation > > to know when there's silence? > > DTX requires the VAD to know when

Hi I apologise if the following message is inappropriate for this list. However, I feel this is the only place where I can get some help with my problem. BOOL CALLBACK RecordProc(HRECORD hRecord, void *buffer, DWORD length, DWORD user) { try { long sent = 0; long inputOffset = 0; long outputOffset = 0; long nbBytes = 0; char *outputBuffer = NULL;

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >>Heh. I guess after playing with different jitter buffers long enough, >>I've realized that there's always situations that you haven't properly >>accounted for when designing one. >> >> > >For example? :-) > > I have a bunch of examples listed on the wiki page where I had written initial specifications:

Hi Marc, I've downloaded the Speex1.2Beta version. In the code still there are some float variables are used for the Narrow band decoding. In the file "nb_celp.c" .93 is getting multiplied with the GAMMA_SCALING [Line number From - 1341 - 1351] Can please tell me weather the 1.2Beta version has complete narrow band decoding in fixed point?? Thanking you, Regards, T

Hello, in my project im using speex 1.2rc1 and the preprocessor VAD seems to only separate complete silence from not complete silence frames. The Speex Manual, you can read "The voice activity detector (VAD) provided by the preprocessor is more advanced than the one directly provided in the codec." but if you go to the source code in preprocess.c line 995 "/* FIXME: This VAD

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> gcc version 3.4.5 (mingw special) > > Can you try 4.0 or 4.1 just to be sure? mingw (native gcc for win32) doesn't officially support using gcc 4.0 and 4.1 yet (apparantly there have been some issues), so there are no binary packages. But if you think it helps, I can compile gcc 4.1 and give it a shot. >> Compile flags: >> DEFINES +=

Dear All, I like to simulate a physiologically based pharmacokinetics model using R but am having a problem with the daspk routine. The same problem has been implemented in Berkeley madonna and Winbugs so that I know that it is working. However, with daspk it is not, and the numbers are everywhere! Please see the following and let me know if I am missing something... Thanks a lot in advance,

hi, How do i detect whether there is silence in media using speex? Is there any API which decides that the audio data only contains silence? Basically i will have PCM linear data, I want to know whether it is complete silence. Is it that during encoding speex_bits_write will return a lesser number if the audio at byte_ptr contains silence? thanx, Rahul -- Rahul Arvind Jadhav

Hi guys I have tried compiling this attached code, I made all the buffers 320, there is no trace of a 160 buffer, but I get a " SpeexEncoder requires 320 samples to process a Frame, not 160" error. Maybe there's something I'm missing, here's my code: import java.io.IOException; import java.io.FileOutputStream; import java.io.File; import