similar to: AEC params

Hi: I have been trying to test the speex AEC by playing a voice sample (pre-recorded) as a echo and capturing a new voice sample and playing the pre-recorded one, for reference. [Sampling rate 8 KHz, frame size 64] For some reason, I dont see any removal of echo. Does anybody have a idea of * Testing the AEC in some other mechanism or * Getting some sample files for testing AEC Thanks Su ---

Hi: Can anyone give some insight on: 1) As per the Speex manual, there is a mention of the relationship between input frame and echo frame (Pg 19, Para 2). I was wondering of what would be the ideal delay between these two frames, so that the echo is already fed to the canceller and the echo cancellation filter is not inefficient. 2) Corresponding to the above mentioned delay, what filter

Hello all, I am attempting to integrate the AEC algorithm from Speex into an RTP-based voice-over-IP application. The application is supposed to operate on a TI C6412-based board, using Code Composer Studio for development. Everything seems to be working, but the problem is that there is no discernible difference in the output, whether the echo cancel function is called or not. Let me first

Hi Jean Marc, We are running the speex echo canceller code on a Windows Mobile smartphone using a TI OMAP 201MHz 850. We are making voip calls and audio is working without echo canceller code. Simply adding the following 2 functions whether the echo cancellation is wired in (ie we use the output frame ) or not performance becomes terrible. Note 2 separate threads are used to handle audio.

Terrific! The patch fixes my problem quite decisively. I will want to use this with a 16K sample rate. Is it expected to work well with just another slight patch, or will we need to modify it more deeply? Also, are there any tunable parameters besides tail length? I am wondering about the aggressiveness of adaptation and I know you are an expert in that area. Thanks so much, Michael

Hello all, I am trying out the echo cancellation of Speex (1.2beta2) on Windows XP. I use the Windows Media API (i.e. waveInOpen, waveOutOpen etc) for playback and capture, but I cannot make echo cancellation works in my use case. Here is a description of what I tried: (the sound is in 8kHz and 16 bits per sample, the frame size is 240, tail_length is long enough to cover the far end to near end

_____ From: Mohammed Sulaiman [mailto:mhh.sulaiman@talk21.com] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:53 AM To: Dennis Liu Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] Echo Canceller on Windows Mobile Hi, thanks. One question did you use these 2 functions speex_echo_playback speex_echo_capture No, I didn't use them. I use my own code to buffer microphone and speaker data. or do you have your audio in

Thank you for you quick reply, Jean-Marc. I have just used a human voice to replace the sine wave, but the result is like a broken voice after tens of seconds. Do you have some sample voice in .sw that I can test with? I want to have one set or a few sets of sample voice that work for my understanding and debugging. This is the output from echo_diagnostic.m in my human voice test: Far end to

Hello, i'm adding echo cancellation to my voip application, but when i call speex_echo_capture() or speex_echo_playback() causes an assertion failed, it seens that there is a delete in any where. i've encapsulated echo canceller in a class that storage the state and simply call the functions: void EchoCanceller::Playback(short *echo_frame) { speex_echo_playback(echo_state,

Hello, Need some help using the speex_echo_cancel. I've read the documentation about the speex_echo_cancellation function: speex_echo_cancellation(echo_state, input_frame, echo_frame, output_frame); (in) echo_state => speex internal state. (in) input_frame => audio captured by mic. (in) echo_frame => the signal that was played in the speaker. (out) output_frame => the

Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for the suggesting. I tried the test wtih my recording file offline through the testecho. I got the same result(no prepocessor echo suppression) as my recording file for that live call. Basically I don't see the difference between input_frame and output_frame. As I mentioned in my original post, the echo return loss is about 20db. I guess the echo cancelleris not really

Hi: I have been trying to use speex for AEC. I have recorded two voice samples separately using audacity using the same soundcard. I reduced the gain of one of the samples and mix this signal with the other voice sample (saved as a raw sample, with frame size 64 and sampling rate of 8 KHz. I use the mixed one as a ref signal and the other unaltered signal as the echo. Am trying to run the

All, Wonder why all my posts has no line breaker when it displayed the forum... I used Hotmail(Windows Live Mail) with FireFox 2.0. I am posting this msg with IE 7.0 and see if it make any difference. Anybody experienced the same issue and how to workaround it? Thanks a lot! Regards, William From: espzzh@hotmail.comTo: jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.caCC: speex-dev@xiph.orgSubject: RE:

Hi Folks, I am having trouble using speex_echo_cancel. As a starting point, I am using the testecho.c source code. I compiled the 1.2beta1 version. I have not tried any other versions of speex. The document says that the order of arguments to Speex_echo_cancel is (echo_state, input_frame, echo_frame, output_frame, residue) where "input_frame" is as captured from mic and

It seems like the firefox 2.0 not quite works with hotmail... I am reposting my message again with IE for easy readability. Sorry about mess. Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for the suggesting. I tried the test wtih my recording file offline through the testecho. I got the same result(no prepocessor echo suppression) as my recording file for that live call. Basically I don't see the difference

Can you first try the svn version (or apply https://trac.xiph.org/changeset/11882). As I mentioned in a previous email, there's a bad bug in the 1.2beta1 echo canceller. Jean-Marc Coffey, Michael a ?crit : > Hi Folks, > > I am having trouble using speex_echo_cancel. As a starting point, I am > using the testecho.c source code. I compiled the 1.2beta1 version. I > have not

Hello! I hope this Email is still available. My goal is to cancel the echo caused by the client's mic and speaker through the Internet, which is also the aim of Speex. I have read the manual and the api reference, but still have some problems about the usage. 1. about function speex_echo_cancellation(echo_state, input_frame, echo_frame, output_frame); Parameters (input_frame,

> Today's Topics: > > 1. AEC with WB mode (Jean-Christophe.Berge@etu.enseeiht.fr) > 2. Multiple frame encode and decode (Reza Fatahillah) > 3. cant link speex_echo.h (jesus) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:46:03 +0200 (CEST) > From:

The client is the adobe flash player. No install and on 98% of all desktops but we can't change it. It works ok if people use headphones but we need to stop the howl than can build up if more than one person in a conference has mic to close to speakers. Any ideas? Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > 1) Is it ok if the audio is encoded (using

speex-devDear Jean-Marc Valin I got some problems with evaluating the AEC module of speex. I wrote a test main function and compiled it with the speex lib in VC6.0, it initialized the AEC state and called the AEC main function in the same way as what was done in testecho.c. The near-end input wave file was a simple delaying and adding version of the far-end input wave, eg. y(n) =