similar to: Integer implementation of speex

Hi, I am currently encoding 32 Khz/Qual-10/UWB encode mode, with MANUAL_ALLOC enabled ( similar to the c5x/c6x configuration). In file sb_celp.c, I noticed the scratch memory grow during recursive (UWB -> WB) calls to 'sb_encode'. 1. 'stack' was not tracked (with 'tmp_stack' as done at other palaces) after/before - auto-correlation/Levinson-Durbin scope (~line

Hi Jim, > Build 11169 in SVN works correctly. Good. I'll try not to forget the EXTEND32 from now on. > I have attached a zip file (renamed > .txt) with a patch to bits.c to make the byteswapping for TI DSPs > consistent. Seems like unzip can't read it. Either it's in an unknown format or the file got corrupted. Could simply send as multiple (uncompressed)

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: maleout12may.wav Type: audio/wav Size: 95884 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20050524/57112d0c/maleout12may-0001.bin

The attached file contains build files for TI's Code Composer Studio (CCS) for the C54x, C55x, and C6x DSPs. I had intended to post this a couple of months ago, but it took a long time to get around to doing the little bit of cleanup required. This is a file I/O loopback application suitable for running with the CCS simulators, for evaluating memory and MIPs requirements for these

> The C5x and C6x output diverges in build 10143, which has log message "lpc > floor converted to fixed-point." Also, the measured SNR changed from 11.05 > in builds 9854-10141 to 9.22 and 9.24 in 10143. Actually, build 10143 introduced another bug, that was the reason for the 1.1.11.1 release. > There is just four lines in modes.c which declare the constant, and one

R gurus, Every so often(*) someone asks how to suppress scientific notation in printing, so I thought I'd give it a shot, but I need some help. The formatting decision is made(**) on line 286 of src/main/format.c : if (mF <= *m) { /* IFF it needs less space : "F" (Fixpoint) format */ where mF is the number of characters for "normal" printing and *m is the number

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:24 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:38 AM,

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:24 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:49 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:24 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Hiroshi

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Hiroshi Yamauchi via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> ( >>> ​I came across this issue in

On 05/11/2018 08:40 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com > <mailto:yamauchi at google.com>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:49 PM Daniel Berlin > <dberlin at dberlin.org <mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:49 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:24

Dear all, i am currently evaluating which codec to be used for a "very narrowband" voice communication system (using either VoIP either GSM CSD) on mobile devices running Windows Mobile and Symbian OS. I had experience in using AMR-NB 4.75 with VAD on Symbian OS and all worked very well. However, AMR it's not royalty free and if i need to use it on Windows Mobile i will need

I mentioned this earlier in the thread - I would like to see something like D41574 in the optimizer. It's optimizing code that no other pass does currently, and I don't see any other near-term proposal that gets us those optimizations. Omer, can you rebase that to trunk? I think a header has moved, so it doesn't build as-is. I'd like to know if it can catch the cases in D45842. If

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:20 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 05/11/2018 08:40 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:49 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> >> wrote: >>

Hi Jim, Thank for the patch. I'll apply it when I have a few minutes. If I haven't done so after a few weeks, please send it again. I'm in the process of relocating to Australia, so everything's a bit of a mess around here. Also, please post the c5X-specific files to the list (.cmd, .pjt, ...) so they'll be archived. Last thing, I see you defined spx_word64_t as long long for

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Hiroshi Yamauchi via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > ( > ​I came across this issue in the context of > D46336 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D46336>. > ​ ​ > Thanks, Sanjay, for starting this discussion.) > > If > ​we will > move > ​reassociation, > or keep additional ones > ​,​ > out of instcombine,

Just tried your files and I'm not running into any infinite loops and the cancellation works fine. Unless the C6x has the same problem, I suspect a 16-bit problem. I'll check and see if I find something. About the r=0 problem, I can't find where it ends up in a denominator, so I suspect is not (directly) the problem. Jean-Marc Le lundi 08 mai 2006 ? 20:05 -0400, Jim Crichton a ?crit

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Hiroshi Yamauchi via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> ( >> ​I came across this issue in the context of >> D46336 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D46336>. >> ​ ​ >> Thanks, Sanjay, for starting this

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Nirav Davé <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > In any case, the issue appears to be that llvm doesn't realize that the > target address is resolved and erroneously applies branch relaxation to the > jump. I don't know why a linker private symbol would make a difference. > Relaxation is the process of *shortening* jumps that can be