similar to: iGlance is here!

So you all know I've been working with Theora on iGlance for ages. Well, I'm happy to report that after all this time, it's done. (Well, as much as anything in this space is ever done, but it works for some large subset of users, and it has a snazzy website to promote it.) For details, please see: http://www.iglance.com To review, iGlance is a P2P VoIP/videoconferencing

Today marks the one-year anniversary of iGlance, my P2P voice, video, and realtime-collaboration application. In honor of the event, I'm opening my doors to a select group of alpha-users who will: - Help test the boring stuff - Help refine and design the good stuff - Help decide what iGlance is all about As you know, this is a crowded space. There are probably a hundred VoIP,

Today marks the one-year anniversary of iGlance, my P2P voice, video, and realtime-collaboration application. In honor of the event, I'm opening my doors to a select group of alpha-users who will: - Help test the boring stuff - Help refine and design the good stuff - Help decide what iGlance is all about As you know, this is a crowded space. There are probably a hundred VoIP,

(Cross posted to speex-dev from iglance) Enzo -- I haven't tried the fixed point engine, though I've considered it for the WinCE port. For the desktop/laptop edition I'm assuming the slight short->float conversion cost will be made up by the improved performance of the floating point implementation. But I could be wrong: 1) Can anyone recommend whether Speex performs better

Hello everybody, i am searching a solution for a videoconferencing, Any solution (Free/commercial). Asterisk is a great software, but recently we have more and more demands about videoconferencing of 3 or more peoples, Existing solutions are heavy and costly, around 2500? for 1 client. This is insane. Is there any solutions out there for non millionaires ? Or even Free ? I remember a company who

David, Here's the trick ... do this just before your speex_bits_write(): speex_bits_insert_terminator(&bits); Then, when decoding, keep calling speex_decode() until it returns -1 or speex_bits_remaining(&bits) returns 0. Works for me, anyway. Tom David Barrett (dbarrett@quinthar.com) wrote: > > Hi, I'm using Speex and I want to pack multiple frames into a single >

Speaking of video conferencing in conjunction with Speex, we are currently beta testing a solution we developed that offers multi-point, multi-party video and audio using the Speex engine for voice. http://www.wiredred.com/downloads/ecsetup.exe The fair and good audio settings are Speex narrowband, high quality is HawkVoice and toll quality is PCM. -----Original Message----- From:

I would like to participate also. Tony T. ----- Original Message ----- From: "J.K. Lin" <jk@pageshare.com> To: <speex-dev@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:29 PM Subject: RE: [speex-dev] Videoconferencing with speex and jabber <p>> Me, me, me, me too. > I would love to use it if there is one ;-) > (I wish I can contribute more, but Windows is

Figures. I knew I should've just pasted my code: .. while (ret != -1 && speex_bits_remaining(&bits) > 0); I am using a newer version of Speex, so I guess the terminator is a relatively new thing. I'm not even sure if it's necessary, but I think Jean-Marc recommended using it back when I asked this question awhile ago..? Anyway, glad it's working for you. Tom

Hi all, <p>i have send a mail to the jabber mailing list and ask them how to send speex data with the jabber instant messaging protocol. I have added the mail adter this one. If someone here has any experience with jabber and speex please let me know. Thanks, <p><p>Carsten Breuer ====================================================== Hi all, im new on this list, so i want to

Hi Ulrich, <p>you distroyed my evening today ;-). Im only sitting here and follow the videoconferencing thread ;-)). > due to the ongoing discussion on both lists, i simply respond to both > lists. it's hard crossposting, but it's for both roups relevant (i > think). Yes, this was right. There is a great discussion and perhaps we got some points more yet. > +After

Chris Lattner wrote: > The ultimate solution is to use a pattern matching instruction selector > (which we are working on). In the meantime, depending on how RISCy your > target is, it's pretty easy to get reasonable code with few special cases. > Usually this is enough: > > ... visitAdd(Instruction &I) { > > if (ConstantInt *C =

Hello, Has anyone used Polycom's VSX line of videoconferencing equipment with Asterisk? It seems some of their models, namely the newer VSX 5000, supports SIP. -- The Internet used to be a lot of smart people sitting at dumb terminals, but now its a lot of dumb people sitting at smart terminals!

Me, me, me, me too. I would love to use it if there is one ;-) (I wish I can contribute more, but Windows is not my expertise :-( ) -- jk <p>> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner-speex-dev@xiph.org]On > Behalf Of Carsten Breuer > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:22 PM > To: speex-dev@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [speex-dev]

I have almost finished integration of Theora into our videoconferencing program. Since a videoconferencing program is realtime, it is UDP-based and wraps the Theora stream in RTP (More on that later). The problem here is that most examples I could find, wraps the theora stream in ogg, and used over tcp or files. I send over UDP and clients need to be able to start in the middle of the stream.

(I think Timothy intended for this to go to the list; my apologies if it wasn't.) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Theora-dev] Force keyframe creation Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:06:32 -0400 From: Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe@vt.edu> To: David Barrett <dbarrett@quinthar.com> References: <42F4186C.1050605@quinthar.com> David Barrett wrote: > Is there any

Hi all, <p>im new on the list and want to introduce my self. Im a software developer working on engine control software for a german car manufacturer. I want to use speex for a privat videoconferencing project and faces some problems with it. First of all the projects in Visual-C++ doesn't work. I don't mean the path an dependecy problems. That is easy. But there are some errors.

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > If you do this (which I recommend for the first step), you'll notice that > > it produces pretty horrible code, as all immediates are copied into > > registers before they are used. In other words, instead of getting: > > > > R2 = add R1, 17 > > > > You'll get: > > > > R3 = mov 17 >

Greetings all, I'm playing with asterisk and two Polycom VSX300 videoconferencing units. And I'm having zero luck getting video working over SIP. The two units register fine with asterisk, and with "allow=all" in sip.conf, the two units establish voice. But no video. And no obvious messages as to whats going wrong. The config for each is (they're numbered 201 and

I apologize for what's surely a common question, but the Xiph archive-searcher seems broken, and all my other searches have come up dry. Anyway, my question is: Are there any Theora binaries available for Visual Studio.NET? Alternatively, how do I build Theora using Visual Studio.NET? I tried using "\win32\theora_static.dsp", but VS.NET claimed it was corrupt and couldn't