similar to: Noisy sound quality with Blackfin in WB-mode

Hi Bernhard, Can you confirm I'm understanding everything correctly? You encode with the same encoder and then decode with either A) blackfin assembly and fixed-point or B) fixed-point only on Blackfin. Then A) sounds bad and B) sounds good. If you do the same in narrowband, it sounds OK. Is that correct? If that's the case, it's *probably* some kind of bug and/or invalid assumption

Hello Jean-Marc, > Could you try mixing the encoders and decoders (encode with one > version, > decode with the other) to see whether the problem is in the > encoder, the > decoder or both. I tested that,and the results are: The fixedpoint+blackfin encoder used together with the fixedpoint-only decoder produces an bad sounding file (for all the combinations for quality

Hi Jean-Marc, > Can you confirm I'm understanding everything correctly? You encode > with > the same encoder and then decode with either A) blackfin assembly and > fixed-point or B) fixed-point only on Blackfin. Then A) sounds bad and > B) sounds good. If you do the same in narrowband, it sounds OK. Is > that > correct? If that's the case, it's *probably* some

Hi Bernhard, It seems like I messed up somewhere in the lpc code. However, it seems like your patch is also removing some code, which is probably why you see small differences between your asm version and the fixed point. I don't have my setup working at the moment, but could you test the following patch: Index: lpc_bfin.h ===================================================================

Hello Jean-Marc, > Got any luck with the Blackfin stuff? One thing I forgot mentioning that > would probably help a lot in narrowing down the bug is to simply disable > assembly functions one by one and see which one breaks Speex. sorry that I didn't reply for some days. Unfortunately I had some other serious problems with my software which are not related to Speex. I hope to solve

Hello Jean-Marc, I disabled the Blackfin optimization functions one by one and found the error in libspeex/lpc_bfin.h in the autocorrelation computation. Compared to the fixed-point-variant of that function (from lpc.c), the blackfin-code produces correct values except for the zero offset value. Additionally, the loop after the ASM-code assigned values (ac32) wrong to the functions

Users report that an extent map''s list is still linked when it''s actually going to be freed from cache. The story is that a) when we''re going to drop an extent map and may split this large one into smaller ems, and if this large one is flagged as EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING which means that it''s on the list to be logged, then the smaller ems split from it will also be

Hi. I''ve defined a virtual user "kenneth", and depending on a variable in the node definiton I''d like to add the users to different groups. Consider this example: ###### Code start node "server.example.com" { $server_type = "typeA" realize User[kenneth] } @user {"kenneth": ensure => present, uid => 1000,

Hi gang, Is it possible to test if a particular resource has already been defined? I''d like to do something like this: if !Host["$fqdn"] { host {"$fqdn": ip => "$ipaddress_eth0" } } Essentially, test to see if there is no Host resource defined for the current server and if not, add a host entry for itself using the IP address of eth0. Possible?

Dear OpenSSH developers, a publicly accessible sshd on port 22 generates a lot of log clutter from unauthenticated connections. For an exemplary host on a university network, sshd accumulates 5~20k log lines on a single day (more than 90% of the total amount of syslog lines). That is despite the host having a restricted configuration (no SSH password authentication, firewall rate limit for

Please help, I can't install Scientific Linux 6.3 with virt-manager because the key tab switches between kvm windows. I urgently need tab to go on in install process. see screenshot: http://aiai.de/foren/scientificLinux_tab.png Even in fullscreen mode tab changes to kvm window and not to button "continue" for installation process. please help, I want to install scientific linux as

As I start on STP enhancements, it is worth asking, how many users of bridge actually use STP, and if so how big a network is involved.

Hi, win-xp won't boot after installation. The CD is needed to boot from. How can I convince win-xp to boot? That's what I did: ================== I installed win-xp guest on debian squeeze: # virt-install --connect qemu:///system --name winxp-prof --ram 1024 \ --disk path=/dev/vg-levo/winxp-kvm,size=10 \ --network bridge:br0 --vnc --os-variant winxp --cdrom /dev/sr0

Dear R users, It is my pleasure to announce the availability of package stepR (1.0-2) on CRAN. The main purpose of the package is to fit piecewise constant functions (a.k.a. step-functions or block signals) to serial data in a fully data-driven manner under certain (Gaussian or non-Gaussian) distributional assumptions. It mainly implements the algorithms described in the references below -

Dear R users, It is my pleasure to announce the availability of package stepR (1.0-2) on CRAN. The main purpose of the package is to fit piecewise constant functions (a.k.a. step-functions or block signals) to serial data in a fully data-driven manner under certain (Gaussian or non-Gaussian) distributional assumptions. It mainly implements the algorithms described in the references below -

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-rc1-i386 Version: 3.0.3~rc1+hg11686-1 Severity: grave Hello, xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-rc1-i386 fails to install: Setting up xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-rc1-i386 (3.0.3~rc1+hg11686-1) ... Searching for GRUB installation directory ... No GRUB directory found. To create a template run 'mkdir /boot/grub' first. To install grub, install it manually or try the

Morning Folks, should I prefer NFS with UCARP or native GlusterFS mounts for serving the system images to XCP? Which one performes better over 1G network links? NFS is probaby easier to setup due to existing tools like rpcinfo and showmount, both are used inside the storage container code, and there is some code for NFS, not for GlusterFS, except I write one. UCARP has the disadvantage that

On 18.03.23 14:34, David Lang wrote: > modern syslog daemons (including rsyslog, which is default on just > about every linux system) allow you to filter efficiently on the > message contents, not just the severity, so you can opt to throw out > the messages you don't want. > > I advocate for a slightly different way of dealing with it, filter > these messages from

modern syslog daemons (including rsyslog, which is default on just about every linux system) allow you to filter efficiently on the message contents, not just the severity, so you can opt to throw out the messages you don't want. I advocate for a slightly different way of dealing with it, filter these messages from your main logstream, but put them into either a script directly, or a

On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Oliver Braunsdorf via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Perhaps by "value" you mean points-to set? > > Thats right! I meant the points-to set. Sorry I didn't mention that. > I want to track back the value of the parameter to its definition -- an > "assignment" which could be indirect through a pointer