similar to: Speex Windows from 1.1.6 source

Hello! I am downloaded last version of speex library and did compile DLL. But I am have not good sound : Please see my code (Delphi) and say me please WHat I am do not right. Or please send me correct compiled DLL and example of correct using SPEEX_MODEID_WB and SPEEX_MODEID_UWB , denoise, and other effects. How I can set MONO mode in decode? My Code: smpRt:=32000; n:=10; encbits:

Hi Inspired by the changes by Prachi Gandhi to use the command map from the UPS in the bcmxcp driver, I think the map should be used, if available, to control all commands the driver adds using "dstate_addcmd". The following patch is an attempt at doing so. The patch is against the bcmxcp branch. Since my UPS also supports : #define PW_UPS_ON (unsigned char)0x89 /* UPS on

at least for an HP R3000XR with the 6-cereal card, the first CPU is said 6-port card, not the inverter. so get the firmware version from the last CPU, not the first. I wonder wether it makes more sense to store them all, aka ups.firmware.cpu0 etc. $OpenBSD$ --- drivers/bcmxcp.c.orig Wed Aug 23 11:16:01 2006 +++ drivers/bcmxcp.c Wed Aug 23 11:21:26 2006 @@ -742,10 +742,7 @@ void

Hi Here is a very minor patch for the bcmxcp.c driver, mainly fixing the function name used in debug statement, and at the same time fix indentation. Regards Alf Hogemark From 86c7940d0ea11b5b38a7f4518095ee2428d658c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Alf=20H=C3=B8gemark?= <alf at i100.no> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:11:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bcmxcp: Fix method name outputted in

I'm only doing one frame using speex_encode_int greatly simplifies my code I'm not sure why the sample I was working off of was converting the shorts to floats then calling the other encode/decode methods. Based off of your suggestions I tried the following but I get the same result. virtual Enigma::u8* Encode(Enigma::u8* inputBuffer,size_t inputSize, size_t& outputSize) {

Alright noted, I changed me code so that the state is created in the constructor and destroyed in the destructor of the object. However I'm still getting the same issue although I'm sure that would have bit me sooner or later. The new code is as follows. virtual Enigma::u8* Encode(Enigma::u8* inputBuffer,size_t inputSize, size_t& outputSize) { short *in=(short*)inputBuffer;

Hi All, i need your help in determining the problem in the following sample code (taken from speex manual) for fixed point encoding. i tested encoding a 160 sample frame and then decoding it back But The problem is that the decoded frame is totally different from the original frame(see output below).What is the possible reason for this?.thanks for any help #include<stdio.h>

I'm completely new to speex and I'm having issues adding it to my application. I can pass raw PCM and that works fine so I know my transmission code is fine however when I try to encode/decode using speex I get noise almost like a whining/buzzing sound. I'm sure it's and issue in my code but I'm not sure where to start looking other then my gut tells me I'm not sizing or

The way I do this is to compute the number of frames (by dividing the size of my input by the number of bytes per frame and then calling speex_encode_int() that many times. Something like speex_bits_reset( &bits ); for( n = 0; n < num_frames; ++n ) { speex_encode_int( enc_state, (int16_t*)input_tail,

Fellows, time has come for a new NUT release: I'm planning on 2.6.1 next week (max Friday 27), and I'm currently processing remaining patches. If you have some more on your side, please send in. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer -

Hi All, i need your help in determining the problem in the following sample code (taken from speex manual) for fixed point encoding. i tested encoding a 160 sample frame and then decoding it back But The problem is that the decoded frame is totally different from the original frame(see output below).What is the possible reason for this?.thanks for any help #include<stdio.h>

At just a first quick glance, I'm pretty sure that you don't want to be creating and destroying the speex encoder/decoder with each frame. That's supposed to stay the same for more-or-less the entire session. Ken Smith Cell: 425-443-2359 Email: ken at alanta.com Blog: http://blog.wouldbetheologian.com/ On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Christopher Schaefer <disks86 at

On Jul 2, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Kjell Claesson wrote: >> I hope other people can also test this. >> >> Regards >> Alf Hogemark > > Due to some crashes on the disks and lack of time I don't have the git on the > pc now. But maybe some other can commit this. I'd like to ask people to specifically try the bcmxcp branch on GitHub - it includes some changes

I ran into a portability issue with drivers/bcmxcp.c in nut-2.4.1 on my UnixWare 7.1.4 machine. The error I get is ..... UX:acomp: ERROR: "/opt/src/utils/nut-2.4.1/drivers/bcmxcp.c", line 835: integral constant expression expected ..... Looking at the code we see ..... int init_outlet(unsigned char len) { unsigned char answer[len]; ..... Although gcc can handle it, it's not

Hi All, After much searching and head scratching I post you this! I can''t seem to find a generic way to handle multiple select data. The function I use to receive form values will only pass the first selected value from a multiple select. I have pasted part of the form and the function below. Thanks for any pointers, Vince // Example selectbox <select

I have invoke the speex echo cancellation interface as follow, but it seems not work (the echo still exists, my testbed is a small udp based p2p voice chat software). Can anyone tell me why it doesn't work? or whether I have made some mistake? Thanks a lot. #define SPEEX_SAMPLERATE 8000 #define SPEEX_NN 128 #define SPEEX_TAIL 1920 class AECHandler { public: AECHandler(void){

Hi i am using a script which involves the following loop. It attempts to reduce a data frame(zz) of 95000 * 41 down to a data frame (averagedreplicates) of 95000 * 21 by averaging the replicate values as you can see in the script below. This script however is very slow (2days). Any suggestions to speed it up. NB I have also tried using rowMeans rather than adding the 2 values and dividing by 2.

Created corresponding unit test, and the optimization is bit exact with C function. --- silk/SigProc_FIX.h | 7 ++- silk/arm/arm_silk_map.c | 12 ++++ silk/arm/inner_prod_aligned_arm.h | 58 +++++++++++++++++++ silk/arm/inner_prod_aligned_neon_intr.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++ silk/enc_API.c