similar to: click at end of playback

Thank you very much for your immediate attention! I've exported my wav files to raw files before encoding and the click is now gone. That sure beats discarding the last packet, which was the workaround "solution" I was going to implement... Best regards, David Resnick -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca] Sent: Thursday, July 07,

If you have a couple minutes, it probably wouldn't be hard to see where the bug is (I just don't have time this week). It would have to do with the granulepos computation in speexenc. Jean-Marc Le jeudi 07 juillet 2005 ? 08:41 +0300, David Resnick a ?crit : > Thank you very much for your immediate attention! > > I've exported my wav files to raw files before encoding and

Hi, I am experiencing some unfortunate problems when encoding WAV files to spx using version 1.0.4. A "click" which is not present in the original WAV file is added to the end of the spx file. Is this a known problem, and if so, which version of the encoder should I switch to... and if I have to switch the encoder, will I also have to switch the version of the decoder? Sincerely,

Actually, I just tried again with the wav file directly and it just seems to be a bug with the way the speexenc utility handles wav files. The problem doesn't occur with the equivalent raw file (which I used for testing). It's probably really stupid anyway. Jean-Marc Le mercredi 06 juillet 2005 ? 14:00 +0300, David Resnick a ?crit : > I am using speexenc/speexdec to convert WAV files

Ashhar Farhan wrote: > > dear Anders, > > the speex encoder really does not know when you are ending a wave file. > most probably there is a one-off error in your loop that reads the wave > file and you are incorrectly reading the end of the wave file. Hmmm, I am using code ripped verbatim from speexenc. Are there any known bugs of this kind in that? > btw, it will be

Hi, I just started using speex recently and I've been having problem with Speex ver. 1.1.10 decoder. I used Speex to encode a wav file to spx then decode it back to wav file to see the voice quality that results from different speex options. Somehow, I couldn't get the original wav file back. I used both Speex ver 1.1.6 and ver 1.1.10 to both encode and decode, despite the same output

OK, that was a stupid error in the le_int prototype. It's fixed in svn now. Jean-Marc Le mercredi 28 septembre 2005 ? 11:53 +1000, Jean-Marc Valin a ?crit : > OK, it seems like I screwed up the wav header code between 1.1.8 and > 1.1.9. Everything seems fine (playing to soundcard also works), except > that the length reported for the wav is too short, which is why it stops >

I attach two wav files of a few seconds duration that fail to play on Windows Media Player 11 using DirectShow Filter bundled in oggcodecs_0.71.0946.exe, after enconding them to the Speex audio format using VBR, as follows: speexenc.exe --vbr <input-wav-file> <output-spx-file> The output of speexenc.exe --version* *is: speexenc (Speex encoder) version speex-1.2beta3 (compiled Dec 11

this is not really a development question, but i didn't find another mailing list to ask it. any idea why size of wav file doubles when it is encoded to speex and back to wav: $ ls -ls testi.wav 40 -rw-r--r-- 1 foo foo 40674 May 4 14:38 testi.wav $ speexenc --denoise --agc --quality 10 testi.wav testi.spx Encoding 8000 Hz audio using narrowband mode (mono) $ ls -ls testi.spx 20

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > On mar, 2004-09-14 at 16:31 -0700, wrote: > >>Hi there. We're trying to build a speex decoder for Palm OS (i.e. ARM7). >> >>No major problems porting thus far, but when compiling the speex modules with -DFIXED_POINT all the silent parts of the output are replaced with what sounds like high-power white noise. The spoken parts sound great, but

Hi there. We're trying to build a speex decoder for Palm OS (i.e. ARM7). No major problems porting thus far, but when compiling the speex modules with -DFIXED_POINT all the silent parts of the output are replaced with what sounds like high-power white noise. The spoken parts sound great, but all the silent parts in between speaking just sounds like white noise. We're using speex 1.1.6,

Hello Bernard, Friday, December 13, 2002, 7:22:54 AM, you wrote: Bernard> I've one small request - an option on speexenc that allows you to Bernard> specify a speex file to append to, allowing you to concatenate Bernard> streams without losing quality by decoding & encoding. Ideally, it Bernard> would: But you can `cat speex1.ogg speex2.ogg> unionspeex.og` and still have

hi all, thanks Jean for the codec. I am new to speech coding. Am interested to implement speex on a TI dsp, say C54. just downloaded speex v 1.1.6. when I removed optimisation flags for win32 in libspeex.dsp, I get a slightly different output for decoding using speexdec.exe (debug version). no prob for speexenc.exe except for some differences in the ogg header. for anyone interested, i

Hello, I encode a file with speex so i get a .spx file but i want to decode the same file i get only one second of my file and nothing Some idea why? Thanks Damien -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20070430/d5a95090/attachment.html

Interestingly enough.. I started playing around with preprocessing options in 1.1.6 and happened upon the denoise filter (SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE). When i run the test tone using that option it is completely filtered out and I just get (complete) silence. When the test tone is intermixed with regular voice I only get the voice. So while i still don't quite understand why the test tone

Would it help if I scale the input wav data before encoding to spx? One interesting thing is if I encode the same wav file to spx(or decode the same spx file to wav ) on Windows platform, then there is no such big clicking noise, samething is true if I use floating_point speex library to encode/decode on WM2003. Problem happens only on WM2003 using FIXED_POINT library. Thanks Yanxin -----

It seems that with the file I posted, the decode noise persists all the way back to 1.1.1, when using --enable-fixed-point. When we configure with --enable-fixed-point-debug, the decode seems to be correct, even on 1.1.6. Hope this helps, and thanks for your time! Regards, Owen Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi Owen, > > I have little time right now to look at the details, but it would

Hi all, I've another trivial request: Is there any particular reason why speexenc and speexdec return 1 on successful completion? It would be preferable if they returned 0 unless there were errors, to be consistent with other *nix utilities and to allow for easier scripting (eg speexdec sample.spx && cp sample.spx somewhere) Would anyone be against this? TIA, Bernard. --

Hi Jean-Marc I am using speex in my voip app (wideband mode). I have noticed that when VAD kicks in, CPU considerably increases (bitrate decreases to 4 kbps). It takes about 7 ms to encode one frame versus 0.5 ms (for speech). This happens regardless preprocessor is used. Although the issue seems to be driver dependent, it occurs on XP, Vista and Mac OS X. Besides complexity and quality, this

Hi all, i'm going to try to create an app using libspeex (Speex 1.1.10) and Visual Studio and just have a few questions. First, what's the difference between libspeex and libspeex_dynamic? Do I need to include both projects in my new workspace? Next, how do I enable fixed_point using libspeex? Am I correct in assuming that an ARM processor would be able to record speech as speex files