Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1200 matches similar to: "Shorewall-2.1.8"
2016 May 30
2
[Bug 1070] New: NETMAP "to" address is not separated from previous output while listing NAT rules
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1070
Bug ID: 1070
Summary: NETMAP "to" address is not separated from previous
output while listing NAT rules
Product: iptables
Version: 1.4.x
Hardware: x86_64
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P5
2003 Nov 02
0
[ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables-1.2.9
--5uhzMJlTksuFv+PE
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="9A1A73/U17WN0PFw"
Content-Disposition: inline
--9A1A73/U17WN0PFw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi!
The netfilter coreteam proudly presents:
iptables version 1.2.9
1.2.9 is (like most other 1.2.x releases) a maintainance release,
2003 Oct 07
0
[ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables-1.2.9rc1
--va9XEZk9/dJ5GUjX
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="vM12nk/63StVgfqY"
Content-Disposition: inline
--vM12nk/63StVgfqY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi!
The netfilter coreteam proudly presents:
iptables version 1.2.9rc1
Version 1.2.9rc1 is the first release candidate of the upcoming 1.2.9
2017 Jan 27
0
[ANNOUNCE] iptables 1.6.1 release
Hi!
The Netfilter project proudly presents:
iptables 1.6.1
iptables is the userspace command line program used to configure the
Linux 2.4.x and later packet filtering ruleset. It is targeted towards
system administrators.
This update contains accumulated bugfixes, several new extensions and
lots of translations via iptables-translate to ease migration to
nftables.
See ChangeLog that comes
2007 Nov 10
2
Access Point with Ethernet.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi:
I have a small infrastructure of network of local area, that are based on a
computer, with computer and with a Point Access, with Debian Etch 4.0r1.
With Shorewall 3.2.6-2.
Well. Since I have two cards of network, which of which, I have left like that:
Internet --> Router (217.126.221.65) --> eth1 (217.126.221.117) --> eth0
(LAN
2005 May 31
11
More Tests for 2.4.0-RC2 - strange behaviour
Hi all,
I was trying to test ROUTE specific code with a multi-isp serviced box.
There is a bug somewhere, but I''m not able to understand what the real
problem is:
when I issue a "shorewall show capabilities" I get:
Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions...
Processing /etc/shorewall/params ...
Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf...
Loading Modules...
Shorewall has
2012 Jan 11
0
Shorewall 4.5.0 Beta 3
Beta 3 is now available for testing.
Problems Corrected:
1) The value ''0'' is once again accepted in the IN_BANDWIDTH columns of
tcinterfaces and tcrules, and causes no ingress policing to be
configured.
2) MARK_IN_FORWARD_CHAIN=Yes no longer generates an error when
$FW:<address> is entered in the SOURCE column of the tcrules file.
New Features:
1) The
2012 Jan 11
0
Shorewall 4.5.0 Beta 3
Beta 3 is now available for testing.
Problems Corrected:
1) The value ''0'' is once again accepted in the IN_BANDWIDTH columns of
tcinterfaces and tcrules, and causes no ingress policing to be
configured.
2) MARK_IN_FORWARD_CHAIN=Yes no longer generates an error when
$FW:<address> is entered in the SOURCE column of the tcrules file.
New Features:
1) The
2011 Aug 29
2
[Bug 742] New: ip6tables "-m iprange" ipv6 range detection
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742
Summary: ip6tables "-m iprange" ipv6 range detection
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.6.x
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: SuSE Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
Component: ip6_tables (kernel)
AssignedTo:
2019 May 21
0
[Bug 1339] New: NETMAP feature, using a displaced mask fail.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1339
Bug ID: 1339
Summary: NETMAP feature, using a displaced mask fail.
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: unknown
Assignee:
2010 Mar 09
2
[Bug 639] New: iptables iprange
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639
Summary: iptables iprange
Product: iptables
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
Component: iptables
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
ReportedBy: paulo.santos at
2011 Mar 18
6
[Bug 711] New: iptables -m iprange causes unknown error
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711
Summary: iptables -m iprange causes unknown error
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.6.x
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: ip_tables (kernel)
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at
2019 May 09
0
[Bug 1337] New: NETMAP feature, using a displaced mask fail.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1337
Bug ID: 1337
Summary: NETMAP feature, using a displaced mask fail.
Product: iptables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: iptables
Assignee: netfilter-buglog at
2005 Jan 11
0
shorewall iprange tweak
I often find myself doing,
whois some.damned.ip.address
and then copying and pasting the address range for
the miscreant in question, and doing,
shorewall iprange x.x.x.x-y.y.y.y
with the aim to drop the entire range.
My one minor complaint is that I often have to edit out
the spaces between the hyphen when copying and pasting
the address range returned by whois. I tweaked the shorewall
2003 Jul 07
1
Shorewall 1.4.6 Beta 2
Changes since Beta 1:
Problems Corrected:
1. Corrected a problem in Beta 1 where DNS names containing a "-" were
mis-handled when they appeared in the DEST column of a rule.
New Features:
1. The limit of 256 addresses for an address range has been removed.
Shorewall now decomposes the range into an optimal set of
network/host addresses (see also the
2007 Jun 01
0
netmap feature request
Tom,
how hard would it be to add destination and source columns in the NETMAP
configuration file? I have an openvpn tunnel interface I use for three
different branches - but one of them CANNOT be netmap''ed. In the lack of
those columns, I had to use a started script that inserts a RETURN target
in the first line of the nat tun0_in and tun0_out chains.
Thanks for all the good
2004 Aug 12
5
shorewall iprange problem
Perhaps someone can help me understand why this is happening. I''m
trying to write a script using ''shorewall iprange'' to parse some ip
ranges into subnets so that i can place them into the blocklist. I keep
getting an error when i run the script though.
Here is the script:
#!/bin/csh
foreach i (`cat ipranges`)
shorewall iprange $i >>
2005 Oct 11
0
iptables iprange match
Hello list!:
Well, I was able to install xen 2.0.7 using a 2.4.30 kernel in a domU.
The domU have installed gcc3.4 .. after
yum -y install compat-gcc*
and put CC=gcc33 in all make commands and other changes as here:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2005-08/msg00258.html
I''m trying to use the iprange match, but every time when I want apply a
rule I receives:
2014 May 07
1
[Bug 922] New: iprange: --ports is not suppported
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=922
Summary: iprange: --ports is not suppported
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: nft
AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org
ReportedBy: anarey
2004 Dec 21
2
Defining "trusted" hosts/nets on a single interface system
Ok, I give up. I tried, really hard, before asking but I must be the
most stupid shorewall user on the planet :(
My laptop runs a single eth0 interface and knows Net and Firewall as
zones and the default "inbound" policies are Net->Any DROP and >ny->Any
REJECT.
Now at home I have my trusted 192.168.174.240/29 subnet which hosts my
very trusted 192.168.174.242 host and I