Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Re: SDP usage"
2004 Aug 06
0
RTP Profile Revision v5
All:
Attached please find yet another RTP profile revision (v5). You
can also find the document at:
http://www.herlein.com/downloads/speex/docs/
Changes:
- added vbr, cng, ebw, sr optional parameters to MIME
- added vbr, cng, ebw a=fmtp options for SDP use
- added required document attributes for submission to IETF and
IANA (format and author contact information).
Note that we
2004 Aug 06
0
Comments on New RTP Profile Document
The latest revision of the draft profile for use of Speex in RTP
is attached. We plan on submitting this - or a modified version
of this, based on immediate feedback - to the IETF on Monday for
consideration at the next meeting.
Major differences in this revision are:
- removed the discussion in the MIME section. It's a duplicate
of the SDP discussion anyway, and may or may not match the
2004 Aug 06
0
draft-herlein-speex-rtp-profile-01
Hi all,
Please find below the -01 update to draft-herlein-speex-rtp-profile, as
submitted to the IETF.
Regards
Phil
<p>-------------------8<-----------------------------------8<---------------------
<p><p>Internet Engineering Task Force Greg Herlein
Internet Draft Jean-Marc Valin
2004 Aug 06
1
linux.conf.au and streaming (was Re: patch for libspeex)
> Otherwise Greg, can you send the latest version of the RTP draft so I
> can put it on the site (the current one is getting old)?
Attached for all to see.
Greg
-------------- next part --------------
Internet Engineering Task Force Greg Herlein
Internet Draft Jean-Marc Valin
draft-herlein-speex-rtp-profile-06
2004 Aug 06
0
Updated Speex RTP Internet Draft
Hello,
What's the purpose of the 'sr' sdp parameter ?
The sample rate is already given in the a=rtpmap line ?
Simon
Le dim 29/06/2003 à 12:12, philkerr@elec.gla.ac.uk a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below an updated Speex Internet Draft document.
>
> It would be good if we could book some time for discussion on Speex at the IETF
> meeting in Vienna (scheduled
2004 Aug 06
1
Speex configuration
Hi,
I'm trying to cover all Speex configuration options to set
quality/mode/bitrate
in my application and I was wondering if the following all makes sense:
- abr_bitrate
- use average bitrate and set it using bitrate parameter
- SPEEX_SET_ABR
- cbr_bitrate
- use constant bitrate and set it using bitrate parameter
- SPEEX_SET_BITRATE
- cbr_mode
- use constant bitrate and
2007 May 15
4
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Hi all
We are about to send an updated version of the internet draft
"RTP Payload Format for the Speex Codec" to the IETF AVT working group.
Before submitting we would like your input, if you have any comments
or input please send them to the mailing list.
If we don't get any comments in 1 week (by 22. May 2007) we will go ahead
and submit it to the IETF. Of course you can comment
2004 Aug 06
3
Updated Speex RTP Internet Draft
Hi all,
Please find below an updated Speex Internet Draft document.
It would be good if we could book some time for discussion on Speex at the IETF
meeting in Vienna (scheduled for 14th July). The cutoff for submission is
9:00am EDT, (GMT -04:00), 30th June.
Comments and feedback welcomed!
Regards
Phil
2005 Feb 27
0
SPEEX_GET_QUALITY
Hi Maitland,
I think your solution is probably the best implementation you could do
for SPEEX_GET_QUALITY. However, unless you have something against that,
I think removing it would be better, as in many cases (e.g. VBR), the
call just doesn't make sense). This would of course break the API (not
the ABI), but given the fact that it was never implemented, any app that
uses it is already broken
2004 Aug 06
1
RTP Profile Revision
The latest revision of the draft RTP Profile is attached for
review. This will be submitted to the IETF Audio-Video Transport
Working Group for consideration immediately, so if you have any
more comments, let us know.
In addition, we will be applying for an official MIME type.
Note that the AVP code and the MIME type in this latest revision
have been changed from "SPX" to
2004 Aug 06
2
Speex-RTP RFC questions
Looks good. Two things though:
- I think the draft should be names -02 since the last one was -01 (I'm
pretty sure).
- The header in the current document should be changed (they say -01)
Jean-Marc
Le lun 01/03/2004 à 20:17, Greg Herlein a écrit :
> > > > Is this the latest draft?
> > > >
2007 May 29
0
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
> <...>
>
> If we don't get any comments in 1 week (by 22. May 2007) we will go ahead
> and submit it to the IETF. Of course you can comment on it also after it
> has been submitted, but we would like to get the input from the Speex
> community first..
>
thanks for all the input. please find attached an updated version of the draft.
I
2007 Jun 07
0
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Hi
Please find an updated version of the Speex I-D attached. The only
change is addition of the copyright conditions in Appendix A,
as requested by Ivo.
Many thanks for your input.
I will give you a few more days before submitting to AVT working group
/alfred
Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves wrote:
> Do not forget to add the "Copying conditions" to the RFC.
>
> Check
2004 Aug 06
0
First draft for Speex RTP profile - Please send your comments
Hi,
We'd like to announce the first draft for the Speex RTP profile. It was
written essentially by Greg Herlein, with some help from Simon Morlat
and I. We'd like to get some feedback on it before it is sent to the
IETF. Basically this will allow all SIP based VoIP applications using
Speex to inter-operate. For those interested, there's already Simon's
LinPhone (www.linphone.org)
2004 Aug 06
2
SV: Speex modes
Thanks!
Btw, have you tried using SBR-technology or similar with speech codecs? That
might be a good idea I thought.. But I don't know if it produces as good
quality with speech codecs as it does for music codecs. Do you know if there
is any open source variant of SBR?
/Pontus
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner-speex-dev@xiph.org]För
Jean-Marc
2007 Jun 07
1
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Looks good to me.
Jean-Marc
Alfred E. Heggestad a ?crit :
> Hi
>
> Please find an updated version of the Speex I-D attached. The only
> change is addition of the copyright conditions in Appendix A,
> as requested by Ivo.
>
> Many thanks for your input.
>
> I will give you a few more days before submitting to AVT working group
>
>
> /alfred
>
> Ivo
2005 Feb 28
2
memory usage
hi,
jean-marc: i think we can remove spx_sig_t *orig.
but am not sure about exc2Buf. is it for extension?
rgds,
tk
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:42:38 -0500, Jean-Marc Valin
<Jean-Marc.Valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I looked at the code I think there are still places where you can reduce
> memory. For example, I think bufSize can be reduced to around 400
> (instead of
2005 Jul 18
0
Problems to compile speex 1.1.10 on windows
Why not use gcc? You can get either mingw or cygwin. Otherwise I don't
know. Speex should compile with a C++ compiler with only minor tweaks
(forcing the compiler to accept the C casts).
Jean-Marc
Le lundi 18 juillet 2005 ? 17:55 +0000, Wolfgang Frotten a ?crit :
> I am a delphi coder and i have successfully compiled version 1.0.5 to use the
> resulting dll in John Villars
2004 Aug 06
0
Speex modes
> I'm about finished developing a QuickTime component that supports Speex
> (on
> MacOS X and Windows).. As it is now the user can set complexity
> (SPEEX_SET_COMPLEXITY) and quality (SPEEX_SET_QUALITY /
> SPEEX_SET_VBR_QUALITY) and to wether to use VBR or not. Will these
> options
> make it possible to produce all combinations of bitrates/qualities? Or
> should I
2005 Mar 03
0
Improving memory allocation
Le jeudi 03 mars 2005 ? 20:29 +0100, Kleijn, J.S. de a ?crit :
> I use the Intel compiler 7.0 , and it doesn't like it
Does it have an option to enable C99? Otherwise, if you're aware of
another mechanism that allows it to allocate temporary stuff on the
stack, I might be able to support it.
Jean-Marc
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Jean-Marc Valin