Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Hellolololo... effect in long distance?"
2005 Apr 18
3
speex voice seems to be bit breaking over long distance.
Hi,
Ok, what you suggest sound logical to me. Currently, I
have done a small trick to prevent this problem. What
I did is that whenever windows request a voice packet
from me and if I do not have the voice packet, I
repeat the previous packet. Hence, all the breaking
portion is filled with previous packet. This trick
seems to work so far. I am not sure what is the side
effect.
I think jitter
2005 Apr 26
2
100% CPU usage
Hi Jean,
> > > Well, just trace it, how many times are you
> calling
> > > speex_decode_int()?
> >
> > Maximum is 51 times per second. Will this cause
> any
> > CPU high utilization?
>
> That's normal... What CPU are you using? If it's a
> fixed-point CPU, then
> the reason is probably just the fact that the packet
> loss
2004 Dec 28
1
How to convert from Microsft PCM 16bit to float
Dear all,
I have one simple question. I understand that
speex_encode and speex_decode takes float * as an
arguement to encode and decode the sound. However,
when I get the PCM data from the sound card under
win32, it is a just 16 bit array. May I know how do I
convert this 16 bit value to speex float format and to
convert back? Is there got any routine to do this?
YueWeng
2004 Dec 30
2
Speex sound a little artificial?
Hi all,
I have deploy speex 1.1.6 in my application. With no
option set, I can hear that the voice sounds a little
bit artificial like robot. Any idea what causes this?
I use openh323 with speex, but it seems ok. Is it
neccessary for me to use more other filter prior to
encode the sound or after decode my sound?
yueweng
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail -
2004 Dec 28
5
Sound distorted after normalized.
> 16 bit ints have a range of -32768 to 32767. If you divide
> -32768 by 32767.0 you end up with -1.00003051850948 which
> is a bad thing.
>
> Try normalizing with a value of 32768.0.
No. Speex expects values in the +-32767 range, not +-1.0. Just
converting from int16 to float *is* the right thing to do.
Jean-Marc
--
Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca>
2004 Dec 28
2
Sound distorted after normalized.
Dear all,
First, my aim is to achieve VoIP using VBR and DTX
under Win32.
I face a problem using speex 1.0.4 and need some help.
My voice is ok and no background noise when I do NOT
normalize 16 bit value to floating value. Normalized
means dividing the 16 bit value by 32767. Turning on
VBR is also ok but DTX has no effect.
However, the speak is has a continous background beep
sound AFTER I
2005 Apr 26
1
100% CPU usage
Dear all,
I am using speex 1.17 at this moment, everything works
great.
However, I face a problem when no packet arrived from
network for a few second, my CPU usage is 100%. I step
though my code and seems that (not confirmed) the
speaker callback WaveOutCallback() function which call
speex_decode_int(decoder_state, NULL, shortData)
(when no data arrived for PLC purpose) seems to
consume a
2004 Dec 31
2
Speex sound a little artificial?
Hi,
> 1) Normal given the bandwidth/bit-rate used
Do you mean the bit-rate that I should set in the
speex codec?
> 2) A conditioning problem with your audio (i.e. DC
> not removed)
What is DC?
YueWeng
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
2005 Apr 18
0
speex voice seems to be bit breaking over long distance.
> Ok, what you suggest sound logical to me. Currently, I
> have done a small trick to prevent this problem. What
> I did is that whenever windows request a voice packet
> from me and if I do not have the voice packet, I
> repeat the previous packet. Hence, all the breaking
> portion is filled with previous packet. This trick
> seems to work so far. I am not sure what is the
2005 Jan 05
4
Encoding and decoding problem in speex 1.0.4
Hi,
I am using the speex 1.0.4 library from Windows.
I have posted my problem before but didn't get a solution. I am doing an
VOIP project
in which i am recording sound and streaming it to the peer. I wanted to
encode and decode
wav files that brought me to this site.
I am recording sound in the following format:-
m_WaveFormatEx.wFormatTag = WAVE_FORMAT_PCM;
2005 May 04
0
Speex over 56.6K modem
I use Speex with dialup modem users. Even if the dialup modem
is "56K", you should assume that upstream bandwidth available is
only 20-30kbps at the most. I use 16kHz wideband mode and VBR
quality 2. Also, I send 80ms (4 frames) per packet, because
there is an overhead of approximately 33 bytes per packet
due to UDP (8 bytes), IP (20 bytes), and PPP (~5 bytes) headers.
If you
2004 Dec 28
0
Sound distorted after normalized.
Hmmm... sorry i mislead you Tay... i didn't realise my encoder
(libfishsound) was again shifting the data i gave it back to being 32767
based internally.
Zen.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Marc Valin" <Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca>
To: "Tay YueWeng" <yueweng@yahoo.com>
Cc: "speex" <speex-dev@xiph.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December
2004 Dec 30
0
Speex sound a little artificial?
Hi,
This applies to everyone having (or suspecting) problems with Speex. The
first thing to do is to encode the file in wav format and use
speexenc/speexdec on it. If you're getting something different with your
application, it's likely buggy. If the result isn't OK, then it can be:
1) Normal given the bandwidth/bit-rate used
2) A conditioning problem with your audio (i.e. DC not
2009 Aug 31
1
ssanova help
Hi all,
I'm using the ssanova function from the gss package to fit smoothing spline
anovas, and am running into some difficulty.
For my data, I have measurements at 2 milisecond intervals for every
observation. Every observation does not have the same duration, so I have
scaled the times for each observation to a scale between 0 and 1. I would
like to smooth over time, and the following
2005 Apr 18
0
speex voice seems to be bit breaking over long distance.
Dear all,
I have implemented speex. Under LAN environment,
everything is working fine. However, when the source
and destination is about 20 hrs away, with ping
response time of about 800ms, the voice is breaking.
Breaking means you can not hear a smooth voice. Like
the voice is being "chopped" into many pieces.
The amount of packet lost is less than 10%. I have
tried 8KHz, 16KHz, 32KHz.
2005 Apr 19
1
speex voice seems to be bit breaking over long distance.
Hi Jean,
> Actually, Speex has Packet Loss Concealment (PLC)
> builtin. If a packet
> is missing, instead of repeating the previous one,
> just try decoding by
> passing NULL instead of the SpeexBits struct.
>
Thanks, I have made the above changes and the effect
seems to be better now.
> > I think jitter buffering is more correct way to
> solve
> > this problem
2024 May 20
3
Listing folders on One Drive
Hello I have lots of folders of individual Scottish river catchments on my
uni One Drive. Each folder is labelled with the river name eg "Tay" and
they are all in a folder named "Scotland"
I want to list the folders on One Drive so that I can cross check that I
have them all against a list of folders on my laptop.
Can I somehow use list.files() - I've tried various things
2016 Jul 26
2
LLVM social Asia
I am also interested.
Best,
Andrew
On Tuesday, 26 July 2016, 20:36, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:12:48 +0800
From: Raymond Tay via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
To: C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>
Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, clang developer list
<cfe-dev at
2010 Dec 17
1
Dovecot 2.0.8 dysnc problems
Hi All,
I try to install dovecot 2 in ubuntu, but when I try dsync on virtualbox
"dsync -v -u it mirror it at 10.32.1.3"
it come out an error to me.
dsync-local(it): Error: Can't rename mailbox
INBOX_15a69e11bbd4014d09330000a5727609 to INBOX: Target mailbox already
exists
dsync-local(it): Error: Can't rename mailbox INBOX to
INBOX_e67c001b52ca014d8f5c00001f237f90: Renaming
2006 Dec 22
4
Request permission to edit/create new entries for FreeNX and YUMEX
Hi people
I will like to ask for the permission to rewrite the current FreeNX article. The current article is lacking in the information on how to add accounts to the nxserver on centos. I think it will be very difficult for linux newbies to understand how to read that article. I am a newbie too so I can understand the frustration when you can't find an appropriate HowTo article.
Addtional