similar to: voice activity detection

Yes, you can use it independently by using speex_preprocess(). This function can do noise removal, AGC, and VAD. I've been using it to do all three and it usually works very well. There can be a train going by outside, producing lots of sound that makes it through the noise filter, and yet the VAD knows it's not speech. However, sometimes the VAD seems to get into a bad state and

Hi The latest SVN trunk for speex has changed the SpeexPreprocessState to an opaque structure, for jolly good software engineering reasons. However, the Analogue AGC (AAGC) feature of iaxclient (in audio_enode.c) relies on some members of this. It uses speech_prob to detect when there is enough speech to consider AAGC and then loudness2 to decide how to adjust the input mixer. We want to use

Tom, You can look in my archives for my posts on this topic, but what I've found is that the echo canceller works to some extent, but if you're also using the other preprocessing (which you'd definitely need to do _after_ ec, otherwise ec probably won't work at all), the AGC function ends up reversing the effect of ec. That is, while ec reduces the echo, it doesn't

I don't think the echo canceller works yet. The best I could get it to do is trash my audio. If it does work, some sample code demonstrating its use would be really appreciated... Here is what Jean-Marc has said about it in the past: > What should I use for a filter length for speex_echo_state_init()? "Well, it depends on your problem. The filter length represents the maximum

Tom Harper wrote: > Hi All & Jean Marc, > > Once again I find myself delving into the pre-processing code to fiddle > with the VAD, AGC and denoising code. > > Where i am at is that I have implemented all of Steve Kann's mods, and > they are 90% of the way there in terms of working, except that I am still > having issues denoising open air mics. But that is

> As you can tell, the AAGC integration with speex was really a classic > hack. Instead of re-creating the hack, what's probably best here is to > integrate AAGC back into speex, and have a proper API. Agreed here. If you can come up with a clean patch to add that feature, it's something I'd like to see in Speex. > For those of you just tuning in, what I call

I've been using Speex's AGC in my VoIP program with mixed results. One of the problems I had was: At the beginning of the call, if the user hadn't spoken yet and there weren't any background sounds for the AGC to lock on to, most of the time the AGC would almost immediately jump way up to 200x gain (the default max). This is undesirable and usually results in nasty feedback. If

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >If you set the denoiser to "on" and the VAD to "off", what difference >does it make in CPU time? > <p>Same program, running on Athlon XP 1700+: Test 1, using VAD, but AGC, denoise off: tevek@canarsie:~/work/hms/app_conference $ time ./vad_test /tmp/demo-instruct.sw 5 reading from /tmp/demo-instruct.sw, repeating 5 times read 537760

First, I'd just like to thank the Speex community, and Jean-Marc especially, for their great work. I'm developing a VoIP library (which uses IAX, the asterisk protocol) as the network protocol. I've been putting off integrating Speex for a while, as things have been working pretty well so far with GSM. (for those interested, the code is at iaxclient.sourceforge.net). However,

hi! I'm using the speex library in my RTP project (i'm using GNU ccRTP library). My program creates and destroys speex objects everytime a new RTP connection is made. But, when i test it with a client which create a connection to it one after another, the free memory decrease constantly to the point where the programs execution crash because not more free memory. It seems like the

> I hate to be a talker and not a do-er, but I won't be able to write this > myself, probably someone on the iaxclient team could do it. Anyway, let me know if/when someone's working on that. >> Hmm, or does that mean the analogue AGC is actually completely >> independent from the "real" AGC. Any thoughts? >> > > It's actually a bit more

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > The noise suppressor will only attempt to remove stationary noise, > such as thermal noise, fans, ... The AGC can indeed do strange > things in these cases, but it's been improved in svn (compared to > 1.2beta1). OK, then the problem is that I misunderstood the feature. I assumed that dynamic squelch was part of it, but it's really something more

speex_preprocess() isn't covered in the manual, is it? But, it's very easy to use. If it returns non-zero, voice was detected. Tom "Meir Yeshurun" <mt_yeshurun@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I would like to use speex_preprocess() for voice activity detection. I read > the comments in speex_preprocess.h and the relevant paragraphs in the Speex > manual. Is there

Hi, So I have had a chance to delve deeper into the new pre-processing code- I was also able to get VAD, AGC, Denoising, etc working inside of the current release candidate (1.0.3). For some reason, the 1.1.2 release didn't properly encode/decode in our system (on windows) and I haven't had time to determine why. In any case, all of the features jointly work very well- great job! I

This is only remotely related: just out of curiosity, does speex_preprocess work very well for you ? It only works to certain extend for me, and does not seem to completely remove noise from sound card. Even if you unplug the microphone, it still could not get rid of the noise. Any idea how it could be totally eliminated ? <p>Thanks <p><p>-----Original Message----- From: Tom

Hi all, as in subject, speex_preprocess inject noise in my data. Someone can help ? Here's the way that i'm using: #define NN 160 /* 20msec di audio */ #define AUDIO_SAMPLERATE 8000 spx_int16_t TEMP_Buffer[NN]; speex_pp_state = speex_preprocess_state_init(NN,AUDIO_SAMPLERATE); c = denoise; speex_preprocess_ctl(speex_pp_state, SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE,&c); c = agc;

Hi all, i use speex preprocessor features in this way: =================================== #define NN 160 /* 20msec di audio */ ... int tbc=0,c,d,ret; spx_int16_t TEMP_Buffer[NN]; char DLECODE; /* Inizializza il preprocessore Speex se non inizializzato */ if(Modem->speex_pp_state == NULL) { Modem->speex_pp_state = speex_preprocess_state_init(NN,AUDIO_SAMPLERATE); }

On 06/22/2011 04:57 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:39 -0700, Arun Raghavan wrote: > [...] >> I'm also running this on x86 (x86_64, technically), and it's all >> floating-point, so I guess this is a regression somewhere. Will try to >> see if I can run it without any optimisations if possible, which I >> assume should serve as an adequate

Hello, in my project im using speex 1.2rc1 and the preprocessor VAD seems to only separate complete silence from not complete silence frames. The Speex Manual, you can read "The voice activity detector (VAD) provided by the preprocessor is more advanced than the one directly provided in the codec." but if you go to the source code in preprocess.c line 995 "/* FIXME: This VAD

Just curious, how does Asterisk pack Speex frames in a packet. AFAIK, Linphone just sends raw packets, as specified in the RTP draft. Jean-Marc Le mardi 31 janvier 2006 ? 10:43 -0500, Steve Kann a ?crit : > jonathan blais wrote: > > I'm using Linphone. I tested with Asterisk and Speex only, I created > > a channel with echo and it worked. It seems to have problem when >