similar to: Strange speex behaviour

hi there, I am new to mailing list so excuse me if I don't obey to the 'netiquette'. i am writing voice chat and speex is in the root of it. i write it in Java and use JNI to link with 'C'-based Speex 1.2beta. [I know of JSpeex but there are not implemented some features] recently i decided to use DTX feature of speex as well. the code follows. The problem is that no matter

I have a video conference like application that I've been working on for a while now, and a recent change is causing some odd problems, and I was wondering if anyone else had seen problems like this. The issue I'm seeing is that when using the sound card for capture, the audio will eventually get about 1-2 seconds out of synch (delayed), from the video. However, if I use USB devices

I'm running a X100P connected to a POTS line and a TDMP400P w/ two FXS daughter cards. Both calling out from one of the FXS phones (internally) or calling my home number (externally) the FXO card starts to freak out. By freak out I mean I can still hear but it sounds like you are underwater, there is an annoying hiss or buzz on the line as well. If I hang up and pick up another house phone

I was doing some testing with RC2 and I noticed that RC2 doesn't encode past 19kHz with this clip (-b256 and -b350). There are no problems with this clip like it was before, but this clip contains signal past 19kHz which is audible as a faint high-frequency hiss - and that hiss is gone in the encoded file since RC2 cuts off at 19kHz. I think that -b256 and -b350 should encode at least up to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi to everybody. First of all I hope this is the right place to discuss such an (nitpicky) issue. I've just been testing the current Opus release and for mere curiosity compared its performance to WMAPro with CD quality music at low bitrates (48 kbit/s). While Opus generally does a very good job, I found one particular example (a high pitched

2 things, first an idea... next a question. QUALITY MEASUREMENT IDEA: I find it difficult to hear 2 voice samples and tell which is nearer the original, especially if the background hiss is slightly different. So what if you actually subtract the post-compression sound from the original and then listen to the DIFFERENCE. If you can't hear any voice except background noise and some hiss from

Using narrow, wideband, and ultra-wideband encoding on a short 16khz wav gave .spx's of 3,789 ... 2,935 ... and 1,875 bytes. Even after reading the manual, smaller files for the higher frequency encoding seems counter-intuitive. My mp3 at 32 kbps on the original 22khz wav is 3,866 with a quality comparable to speex wideband on the converted 16khz wav, so speex is a 24% improvement in size.

Hi all, I started testing the RC1 encoder at ftp://sjeng.sourceforge.net/pub/sjeng/oggdrop.exe (based on branch_monty_20010708) On the songs I have tested so far (not much :) I did not hear any stereo issues, but there are some very noticeable problems with the produced files. Songs without much high-end will suddenly have one when encoded. (you'd expect it the other way around) It

Hi, I have speex running as a part of a voice conferencing app. Well, one under development anyway. I'm running VBR at quality 3 and get a "hissy-squelchy" background noise. This is fine, kinda, because the internal microphone in the laptop picks up hiss, the sound of the (actually very quiet) hard drive and generally speaking is of less than exemplary quality. To help

I think you misunderstood my quality measurement idea. I mean if you subtract the original and the one after, the LESS voice that is less over or the LESS you can tell when someone is speaking, the better the compression. This is still subjective but I think its easier to tell this way because its easier to tell how much voice is remaining than to tell how much the compressed voice is missing from

Heya all, I'm experiencing some problems with a TDM40P and was wondering if anyone else on this list has similar experiences, or maybe even a possible solution. My setup is a dual PIII-750 with 1 gig of RAM, with an X100P, connected to an analog line to my telco, and a TDM40P with analog phones connected. The TDM-card is not sharing any interrupts, but the X100P is, with the 2 Adaptec SCSI

I'm trying to use Asterisk with a TDM400P and 2 analog lines, but I'm having a hard time getting the kind of audio quality that I'd like. I'm hoping to be able to use SIP phones to make calls through Asterisk and have the same quality as a regular analog phone connected to the PSTN. Are my expectations too high? Is it that once I'm using Asterisk as a gateway to the PSTN, I

Hello! I am downloaded last version of speex library and did compile DLL. But I am have not good sound : Please see my code (Delphi) and say me please WHat I am do not right. Or please send me correct compiled DLL and example of correct using SPEEX_MODEID_WB and SPEEX_MODEID_UWB , denoise, and other effects. How I can set MONO mode in decode? My Code: smpRt:=32000; n:=10; encbits:

Hi, The leakage problem you describe is very, very common and you will need to do something to address it. I modified the version of Speex I use to implement an adjustable max gain. If you look at speex_compute_agc in preprocess.c, you will see: if (agc_gain>200) agc_gain = 200; This max of 200 is usually more than enough to amplify leakage which occurs either in the sound

Hi, I have just built my home Asterisk box into a better PC that became available (still only a P2 350 but it only has to manage 1 analog line).. Anyway I have built it on Fedora Core 1.. I have an X100P and a TDM400P (1 module installed).. These cards were working fine in my older PC that was running my Asterisk at home.. The inbound calls via the X100P to my sip phones are working great..

In looking forward to the release of wine 1.0 I have a question about "Browse Applications by Rating" http://appdb.winehq.org/browse_by_rating.php When adding test data you can only add reports on what looks like the last 6 releases? Eg wine versions 0.956 / 0.957 /0.958 /0.959 /0.960 /0.961 Do these stat's on "Browse Applications by Rating" report this? If not what does

Anton A. Shpakovsky <saa <at> tomsksoft.com> writes: > > As for me - speex_echo_cancellation is a better choise. Try using it in > capture thread instead > of those speex_echo_capture and speex_echo_playback functions. > > And please, describe your problem in details. Cause the fact that you > "didn get echo cancellation" > doesn't mean you are

Hi, I had ordered a TDM40B and developers kit a few months ago. I have everything installed and working, with one exception - sound quality. When placing a call it sounds like a very bad cordless phone - lots of hiss / static in the background. This even happens with the dialtone, though it is much worse one the call is connected. This does not occur when the phone is directly connected to the

Dear Jean-Marc and Peter: Thank you both very much for your time and advice. I did not realize that Lame MP3 code has a -r option (without reading its code). I have tried the suggested command lines verbatim with the added -r option, along with other combination of option settings. I could not figure out how to eliminate the distortion in the result, like voice turning either high or low

Hi every one, I have an unfortunate need to release a closed source BeOS media codec for Vorbis, basically I'm using headers under an NDA so I can't release them. (Yeah I know closed source boo hiss). So I have a couple of question about what I need to do for all this to be above board. I've made no changes to the libraries so thats not a problem. As far as I can see as