similar to: Ask about arm-asm perfomance

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Ask about arm-asm perfomance"

2004 Aug 06
1
status report on the Windows CE (PocketPC) ACM codec
> > It was essentially my own mistake. After the Embedded C++ IDE crashed unexpectedly, > the .lib file was no longer present in the project settings (the project had not been saved) > so all the errors I got were caused by a missing .lib reference in the link stage! > I had to change my cross compiler target to "arm-wince-pe" because otherwise the > object/.lib files
2004 Sep 29
3
Fixed point bug in 1.1.6
Please compare samples: http://www.ivo.pl/ivo2/sound/krwawa_org.wav http://www.ivo.pl/ivo2/sound/krwawa_fixed.wav http://www.ivo.pl/ivo2/sound/krwawa_float.wav krwawa_org.wav is original file. Both output files was created using same program by compressing from wav to speex, then decompressing from speex to wav (using speex_encode_int and speex_decode_int). Only difference was used speex
2005 Dec 20
3
CVS compilation and EVC++ 4.0
Hi all, I'd like you to know i'm not able to build Speex library anymore from CVS without modfing the code in mdf.c. This is due to the fact that EVC++ compiler doesn't like memory allocations in this form: spx_word16_t w[N]; where N is not a constant. I know this is not an error for gcc compiler and ANSI standard but it is in VS2005 and EVC++ 4.0 If someone knows how to compile
2004 Aug 06
1
Project setting for embedded visual c++ 3.0
Hi all, I'm quite new to Speex and i'm tryng to do a porting of it for my pocketpc platform.... The encodig time seem to be too hight, i think something goes wrong putting --enable-fixed-point --enable-fixed-point-debug --enable-arm-asm in project setting of EVC++ 3.0 (i've got EVC++ 4.0 too) i do my test with an Ipaq 3850 (206 MHz IntelĀ® Strong ARM 32-bit RISC Processor) running
2004 Aug 06
1
Fatal end of line errors occur when trying to compile libspeex in eVC++ 3.0 or 4.0
Hi all, I'm trying to create a speex decoder library for Pocket PC platform. I then intend to use this library within my .NET Compact Framework application. But when I simply try to compile the libspeex files within my eMbedded Visual C++ environment, I receive the following error c:\documents and settings\asheeshv.grapecity\desktop\pocketpcdll\speex\bits.c(367) : fatal error C1010:
2004 Aug 06
1
Libspeex-cygwin-EVC++ 3.0
Hello Carl, Can you send me libspeex compilated in eVC. And can you describe where and how set the FIXED_POINT flag in eVC. Thanks you. Regards. Rodrigo. <p>----- Mensaje original ----- De: "Carl Douglas"<CarlD@itouchmobility.com> Env.: 15/01/04 17:43:43 Para: "speex-dev@xiph.org"<speex-dev@xiph.org> Asunto: RE: [speex-dev]
2004 Oct 02
1
Speex for Samsung ARM processor
Dear Speex Developers, I'm trying to use Speex on a development board that has the Samsung 2140 ARM Processor (model S3C2410X01, ARM 920T Core). I enabled the arm assembly, i.e. build the speex library using the following configure command: ./configure --enable-fixed-point --enable-arm-asm --enable-fixed-point-debug --host=arm-linux After linking the library with my application, I ran
2004 Sep 29
1
ARM w/ assembly & fixed point crash
I've targeted Speex to run under eCos with Thumb interworking using arm-elf-gcc 3.3.3 I'd written a small test case to verifiy the operation: #include <speex/speex.h> void speex_test(void) { SpeexBits bits; unsigned int frame_size; void *enc_state; float *speex_frame; cyg_uint64 t1, t2; int i; speex_frame = (float *)0x00030000; /* Address of Speex data
2004 Aug 06
3
status report on the Windows CE (PocketPC) ACM codec
Christian Buchner wrote: > Now here is where I have problems and not yet found a solution: I know very little about this, so take everything that follows with a large pinch of salt. > * the function names exported in the .lib created by gcc are not compatible > with the function name decorations that the VisualC++ embedded linker expects. Which version of gcc are you using? I know
2004 Aug 06
0
Libspeex-cygwin-EVC++ 3.0
I have built the Speex library for Pocket PC using the FIXED_POINT flag in eVC 3. It works fine. I think the iPAQ 3600 (ARM SA 1110, I think this is a 200mhz cpu), is a bit slow for encoding in realtime. The Speex encode function takes 30+ ms to encode one 20ms sample frame in a debug build. I didn't try the release build with compiler optimization. The iPAQ 3970 (PXA250, I think this is a
2005 Jul 12
1
How to compile libspeex to .lib
Hi, I am probably missing something really simple (since I don't know very much about compiling or anything) but I am trying to compile the latest version of Speex (1.1.10) into a .lib file. I have compiled it with GCC under Cygwin with -enable-fixed-point and --enable-static, and have produced a .a file. I want to be able to use it with eMbedded Visual C++ 4.0. I guessed that I would need
2005 Aug 23
1
Problem with RCMD build ...
Hi I have write A function to draw pyramid of age. I have two function draw.pyramide(h,f,l) , pyramide(h,f,l) and a data frame with data. I first use package.skeleton("pyra") I got the package structure Then in my shell I use > RCMD build pyra I get this : check for description ... OK .... removing junk files but "cannot open
2005 Dec 20
0
CVS compilation and EVC++ 4.0
I'll try fixing that. It's funny "gcc -ansi -Wall" doesn't even complain about it despite the fact it's not C89-compliant. In the mean time, you can always replace it with: spx_word16_t w[1024]; and you'll be fine (unless you try AEC with a frame size > 512). Sorry about the inconvenience. <cheap shot>Must be the price to pay for using an inferior
2019 May 23
1
Catch all for dovecot authentication?
On 23 May 2019, at 01:44, Marc Roos via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > I would like to redirect sometimes a user to a 5GB garbage messages mailbox. So you want to setup a service where random spammer/hacker can trivially DDOS your system? How many simultaneous 5GB streams can you handle? How much will your bandwidth bill be if you send 5GB a million times in a month? --
2004 Dec 17
2
NOP pattern - how to make SPEEX packets bigger?
How can I add some size to SPEEX encoded packets without affecting decoding results? I need it to fit smaller (due to VAD) packets in CBR acm-wav file. i.e. I have 10 bytes packet with 0.02s of silence (only background noice without speech). I need to fit it in 16kbps CBR wav file, so I need to put 30 additional bytes to this packets, but decoder should still decode only 0.02s of background
2015 May 02
2
Samba 4 fileserver perfomance
I have at home two centos boxes: Box A - centos 6.4. gui version Box B - centos 7.1. minimal version. They are connected to 100Mb router (both boxes have 100Mb network adapters). Box B has software raid 1 and sata II interfaces.?On box B samba4 is installed and I copy files to samba share ( from box A to box B). Network monitor (iptraf-ng) shows only 20000 kbps of this copying operation. That is
2015 May 04
1
Samba 4 fileserver perfomance
Hello, Am 03.05.2015 um 17:38 schrieb ????????? ????????: > Thank you for your time. What network did you test it? > 100Mb or 1000Mb? I'm using 1Gbit here at home. With a 100Mbit connection it wouldn't be possible to reach transfer rates of 110MB/Sec. A realistic good transfer rate for a 100Mbit connection is just around 11 MB/Sec. Regards, Marc
2008 Sep 18
1
Fixed Point Perfomance
Hello Developers, I am considering using SPEEX on an embedded processor that does not have a floating point unit. Does anybody have a SPEEX performance characterization on a fixed point processor? More specifically, I am interested in knowing how the MFLOPS values from Table 9.2 in the manual translate to fixed-point instructions when SPEEX is compiled with enable-fixed-point option. Any help
2008 Jun 18
3
R perfomance question !!!
I ran the simple script bellow and received shoking results. It was complied for about 15 seconds !!! on modern Intel Core Duo computer. i=0; while(i<5000000) { i=i+1; } Using Visual Basic I can complete the same script (simple loop of 5000000 itterations) in 0.1 sec. Is it realy R not suitable for huge computing. -- View this message in context:
2010 Jun 16
4
perfomance issue with bricscad
Hi winegurus! I am quite new to wine. :( I have winehq latest stable release installed. My os is Ubuntu lucid. My hardware: core 2 duo 2.3ghz, graphic card nvidia 220 gt with 1g , board assus p5kpl am in, 1g ram My nvidia has proper drivers installed and recognized by x I installed bricscad v9 for windows without any problems. Tip: Bricscad seems to run quicker when I select nt 3.5 or 4.0 on