similar to: shorewall iprange tweak

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742 Summary: ip6tables "-m iprange" ipv6 range detection Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: SuSE Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: ip6_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639 Summary: iptables iprange Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: paulo.santos at

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711 Summary: iptables -m iprange causes unknown error Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

Hello list!: Well, I was able to install xen 2.0.7 using a 2.4.30 kernel in a domU. The domU have installed gcc3.4 .. after yum -y install compat-gcc* and put CC=gcc33 in all make commands and other changes as here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2005-08/msg00258.html I''m trying to use the iprange match, but every time when I want apply a rule I receives:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=922 Summary: iprange: --ports is not suppported Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy: anarey

Perhaps someone can help me understand why this is happening. I''m trying to write a script using ''shorewall iprange'' to parse some ip ranges into subnets so that i can place them into the blocklist. I keep getting an error when i run the script though. Here is the script: #!/bin/csh foreach i (`cat ipranges`) shorewall iprange $i >>

Hi, I have the following problem while activating this rule entry using shorewall-shell: ACCEPT:notice:rul WAN:139.x.x.226 INT:139.x.x.153-139.x.x.156 udp 1024:65535 1024:65535 "-m iprange" in front of "--dst-range" is missing in the activation command. The logging entry (above) is set correct. Below is the debug output. Thanks Regards Günter + case $level in +

Hi there, I would like to setup up my Asterisk to do this: receptionist answers the call, caller says he wants to leave a voicemail message for Ashleigh, receptionist transfers the call to Ashleigh's voicemail I guess It has something to do with dynamic features, or probably blind transfer to special ext. might do it what would you recommend? cheers!

Changes since Beta 1: Problems Corrected: 1. Corrected a problem in Beta 1 where DNS names containing a "-" were mis-handled when they appeared in the DEST column of a rule. New Features: 1. The limit of 256 addresses for an address range has been removed. Shorewall now decomposes the range into an optimal set of network/host addresses (see also the

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Nathan McCauley <nathan.mccauley at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi list, > > For a tool I'm working on I'd like to know where instructions end up in > compiled executables by looking them up in the symbol table.  Therefore, > I've been trying to use the  llvm.pcmarker Intrinsic, but I've had no luck. > When I pass .bc files with this

Hi Everyone, I am building a script for a client and my imagecreatefromjpeg() is throwing a fatal exception, and dying. It seems as my server with CentOS 4, PHP 4.3.9 doesn't have >= GD-1.8 support or better. I did a phpinfo() and I can not find any reference to GD..............Any help on this would be well appricated -- Best Regards, Jon McCauley

Ok, I give up. I tried, really hard, before asking but I must be the most stupid shorewall user on the planet :( My laptop runs a single eth0 interface and knows Net and Firewall as zones and the default "inbound" policies are Net->Any DROP and >ny->Any REJECT. Now at home I have my trusted 192.168.174.240/29 subnet which hosts my very trusted 192.168.174.242 host and I

Hi list, For a tool I'm working on I'd like to know where instructions end up in compiled executables by looking them up in the symbol table. Therefore, I've been trying to use the llvm.pcmarker Intrinsic, but I've had no luck. When I pass .bc files with this intrinsic into llc, I'm given this error: LLVM ERROR: Cannot yet select: 0x2026938: ch PCMarker 0x1f0c678, 0x20268b0

I can't be totally sure what 'short' is on your platform, but if it's (probably) 16-bits, it looks like you're treating the samples in buffer[] as packed 16 bit numbers. but all samples in buffer[] are 32-bit signed integers in host order, regardless of the bits-per-sample of the frame. so to get them down to shorts (assuming they'll fit), do like: FLAC__int32 *

Supposing I want to use the File decoder., and set the I/O callbacks. How do I do it? The API (version 1.1.2) documentation gives functions to set the ``write``, ``metadata`` and ``error`` callback. What about the ``read``., ``eof``, etc. callbacks. If i'm using the file decoder., can i still use the functions from the stream_decoder_set_* for this? -- Joe Steeve (http://www.joesteeve.org/)

Shorewall 1.4.6 is now available. Thanks to Francesca Smith, the 1.4.6 Sample configurations are also available. The release is currently available at: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall It will be available at the other mirrors shortly. This is a minor release of Shorewall. Problems Corrected: 1) A problem seen on RH7.3 systems where Shorewall encountered

Hello list, On linux, ld has the following option: --whole-archive For each archive mentioned on the command line after the --whole-archive option, include every object file in the archive in the link, rather than searching the archive for the required object files. This is normally used to turn an archive file into a shared library,

Hi, I'd like to disable all inlining in llvm-gcc/llvm-g++. From the FAQ on llvm.org, I see: "Passing "-Wa,-disable-opt -Wl,-disable-opt" will disable *all* cleanup and optimizations done at the llvm level, leaving you with the truly horrible code that you desire." But from a cursory glance at llvm-backend.cpp I don't immediately see that everything has been disabled

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635 Summary: module owner user is no identified in nfs Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: unknown AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 23:14, Josh Coalson wrote: > but all samples in buffer[] are 32-bit signed integers in host > order, regardless of the bits-per-sample of the frame. so to get > them down to shorts (assuming they'll fit), do like: > > FLAC__int32 * LChannel = buffer[0]; > short TempSource = (short)LChannel[LPos]; > > instead of > > LChannel =