similar to: SPEEX_GET_QUALITY not implemented.

Hi All, Almost all my question is in the subject. I have written the following small program and I get an error message when I try to use SPEEX_GET_QUALITY. This functionality seems not to be used in speexenc.c or speexdec.c. I would appreciate any hints. best regards, Alain Aubord ---------------------------test.c--------------------------------------- #include <stdio.h> #include

Hi Maitland, I think your solution is probably the best implementation you could do for SPEEX_GET_QUALITY. However, unless you have something against that, I think removing it would be better, as in many cases (e.g. VBR), the call just doesn't make sense). This would of course break the API (not the ABI), but given the fact that it was never implemented, any app that uses it is already broken

To close debian bug #271052, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271052 I went ahead and did the following: $ diff -u ../original/speex-1.1.6/libspeex/nb_celp.c libspeex/nb_celp.c --- ../original/speex-1.1.6/libspeex/nb_celp.c 2004-07-15 01:16:52.000000000 -0400 +++ libspeex/nb_celp.c 2005-02-27 08:24:49.000000000 -0500 @@ -1746,6 +1746,21 @@ st->submodeSelect =

I am embedding speex in boost python when i execute int TSpeexEncoder::getQuality() { int Quality; speex_encoder_ctl(enc_state,SPEEX_GET_QUALITY,&Quality); return Quality; } i get the error warning: Unknown nb_ctl request: 5 looking in the header SPEEX_GET_QUALITY is equal to 5 I am able to read all the other settings. the codec appears to be set with VBR=0 I am

> 1) I was interested in fetching the default quality setting > fornarrowband: > speex_encoder_ctl(_encodeState, SPEEX_GET_QUALITY, &value); > > Unfortunately, the above fails with libspeex 1.1.4. The console > shows: > > warning: Unknown nb_ctl request: 5 Actually, I never implemented SPEEX_GET_QUALITY. It's not that usefule anyway, but I might do it in the

Hello everyone, I'm finally beginning to use Speex for a project. As expected, the implementation so far has been very easy and I am thrilled with the capabilities and flexibility of Speex, especially the new features in 1.1. My efforts so far have resulted in a couple of questions: 1) I was interested in fetching the default quality setting for narrowband:

On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:09:48PM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi Maitland, > > I think your solution is probably the best implementation you could do > for SPEEX_GET_QUALITY. However, unless you have something against that, > I think removing it would be better, as in many cases (e.g. VBR), the > call just doesn't make sense). This would of course break the API (not

Hi Reed, I've been using Speex to transmit TTS for years. It works very well with no tweaking. I use Microsoft TTS ("Microsoft Mike") with Speex at 16kHz wideband and VBR quality 6. Sometimes I forget that the sound is even coming from another computer and being compressed+decompressed. If anything, TTS seems easier for Speex to deal with than real voice. But I don't

Reed Hedges a ?crit : > > If you do decide to do things this way, decode from each of the three > streams seperately (with different decoder states) and combine them > somehow after decompression. The jump from one stream to the other will > sound poor, though, both from the cuts in the output, and also from > sending discontinous input to the decoder(s). That's the case

Tom Grandgent wrote: > Have you tried using 16kHz wideband? The sound quality is far superior to > narrowband, IMO, even if you have to turn the VBR quality down (to say, 2) > to save bandwidth. Thanks for the info Tom! Probably narrowband is hurting me, but my system is currently built on that. I want to try to get acceptable performance from narrowband if possible before trying

Thanks for the advice. With complexity=1, bit rates 5950,8000 and 15000 (CBR only), I'm still getting 30-50 seconds encoding time for a 10-second file. To anyone who has made this work in ARMv4, or knows how to, can I get some advice on the settings? FIXED_POINT is already defined in all relevant files. My source code is patterned after sampleenc and I haven't tried using Ogg.. my source

Jesus, Unfortunately, FFT and magic algorithms don't work (yet?). You might want to try this if you're not satisfied with Speex VAD: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2008-August/006860.html It won't perform any miracles, but I think it works pretty well and is easy to tweak. Tom >---- Original Message ---- >From: jmorion at toomeeting.com >To: speex-dev at

Hi, I am an user of speex codec.Can I ask some question about the speexcodec 1.2beta2 on installed to linux(fedora 6) thanks! After I downloaded the latest version of codec then I type the commands to install : configure -prefix=/home/...../test -enable-shared -enable-static make make install then I try to compile my encode.c here is the encode.c of mine: =====================================

I used Microsoft text to speech with speex. It sounded reasonably well. I didn't experiment with various quality settings (8KHz, default quality). I was capturing audio from a sound card, not the direct wave data from the TTS engine. .a -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Reed Hedges Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:23 AM

Reed Hedges wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> David Siebert wrote: >> >>> Actually I was hoping to store speex compressed audio into a wav >>> container. Not to trans code it. >> >> To the best of my knowledge, that is not possible. > > Well, it's possible to put compressed data into the WAV file instead of > PCM audio data, and set

Hi Tom, Thanks for your reply, I'm having a few difficulty's following you advise. You mention that I should be calling 'speex_encoder_int' & 'speex_decoder_int', I'm having problems finding these functions in the speex header. I am currenlty calling speex_encoder_init & speex_decoder_init in my test code, I have repeated the relevent bits of the example

hy, recording and playback is working perfectly without speex. i have try to set samplerat from 6000 to 441000 and quality from 1 to 10 sam with complexy, but the best i can get is with 16000 samplerate, 5quality and 3complexy .. but still, the voice that came out is annoying, artificial, robot ,... Lp, Tim +--------------------------+ | email: rico at gama.us | | www: http://gama.us

It seems that speex (speex 1.0.4 on OSX 10.3.9) is writing over the input buffer (with what looks like a sine wave). Included below is a short program that demonstrates the problem. Is this a bug, or am I doing something wrong? I don't see this behavior mentioned in the docs. I don't really need the input buffer, but I'm guessing this problem is related to a high pitched sound

I suspect I am missing something basic but I do not seem to be able to get the sampleenc and sampledec programs to work together. I think I do not have a compile swtich of flag set correctly. Backgound information: 1) 1.0.4 tar package 'make' worked and installed on a mandrake 10.0 linux 2) speexenc and speexdec appear to work fine. 3) testenc and testenc_wb work fine, though I

I suspect I am missing something basic but I do not seem to be able to get the sampleenc and sampledec programs to work together. I suspect the decode operation is failing, but I cannot find out why. Backgound information: 1) 1.0.4 tar package 'make' worked and installed on a mandrake 10.0 linux 2) speexenc and speexdec appear to work fine. 3) testenc and testenc_wb work fine, though