similar to: Subscription Request

Shorewall-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 533537 We have received a request from 207.34.24.8 for subscription of your email address, <jgofton@danicar.net>, to the shorewall-users@shorewall.net mailing list. To confirm the request, please send a message to shorewall-users-request@shorewall.net, and either: - maintain the subject line as is (the reply''s additional

Thanks Jim, But i didnt find this project... It's in CCS folder or on TI site ????? Thk's Em 08/04/2008, ?s 15:52, Jim Crichton escreveu: > The TI directory of the Speex source distribution contains a C5509A > project that builds and runs in TI's Code Composer Studio > simulator. This project does file I/O to files specified in the > main source file. See

>From: speex-dev@xiph.org >To: wolfkharl@hotmail.com >Subject: Please confirm your message >Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 07:08:06 -0400 > >Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. >We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of >"Adaptivity". > >Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your >mailer's

The TI directory of the Speex source distribution contains a C5509A project that builds and runs in TI's Code Composer Studio simulator. This project does file I/O to files specified in the main source file. See README.TI_DSP in the main directory for some tips. You should use the 1.2 beta 3 distribution. You should be able to load, build, and run this with no effort except to get the

Dear R-helper, I made a mistake during my subscription, and think that I turned off from the mailing list. I confirm that I want to join the mailing list and wish to post some emails. Cheers, Anna Meissner [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

If you're talking screen pops, crm integration, type CTI, Trixbox has hooks built in for SugarCRM. Cory Andrews -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt Florell Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 3:59 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users]

Hi. I've found a large bug in Speex Codec implementation in Openh323 code. I've signalled this bug in the Openh323 site, in the section "Report bugs". THE BUG NUMBER IS 143! Everybody can verify that the report is arrived monday 7 July!!!!! But no one has analyze this bug....!!!! So the result is: Openh323 implements Speex Codec that runs with wrong bit rates and that

All, Wonder why all my posts has no line breaker when it displayed the forum... I used Hotmail(Windows Live Mail) with FireFox 2.0. I am posting this msg with IE 7.0 and see if it make any difference. Anybody experienced the same issue and how to workaround it? Thanks a lot! Regards, William From: espzzh@hotmail.comTo: jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.caCC: speex-dev@xiph.orgSubject: RE:

Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for the suggesting. I tried the test wtih my recording file offline through the testecho. I got the same result(no prepocessor echo suppression) as my recording file for that live call. Basically I don't see the difference between input_frame and output_frame. As I mentioned in my original post, the echo return loss is about 20db. I guess the echo cancelleris not really

Le mercredi 19 juillet 2006 ? 20:05 +0800, Janus.Wang@QMITW.COM a ?crit : > Hi Jean-Marc, > Please read the attachment file for Marvell 8618 datasheet for your reference, Too much is like not enough. Care to summarize? (speed, arch level, ...) > BTW, Could you mind to specify the voice computing power for Speex codec? > 1. Sample Rate 8K / Bit Rate - 2.15K ~ 24.6Kbps ( NarrowBand)

Hi, i think it will work correct.when one thread use encode,the others wait for. in java, i think we can do like this: synchronized (Encode) { Encode.encode(short[] in, byte[] out); } In the doc of speex: it says the speex is not thread-safe. ------------------ ???? ------------------ ???: "????? ?????????"<romius99 at mail.ru>; ????: 2011?12?7?(???) ??4:00 ???:

Hello Cesar I'm using Speex on a PPC2002 and PPC2003 with no problems. For tune-up remember to define the FIXED_POINT macro in Project->Settings in eVC. With this setting you ought to be able to at least decode in realtime while using debug-mode. Kind regards Bjoern D. Rasmussen >From: "cesarbremer@raseac.com.br" <cesarbremer@raseac.com.br> >To: speex-dev@xiph.org

Any ideas on the following? (CVS 10/01/2003) Only reference I could find was a Zaptel change log update... 2003-09-02 18:23 martinp * wct4xxp.c (1.6): Get rid of the Double missed interrupt message every time you load the driver and an email refering this to serial console usage. Something I should worry about? Oct 3 22:48:01 cti-350 kernel: TE410P: Double/missed interrupt detected Oct 3

I don't think a compiler is going to be enough. I tried perl scripting the output of a linux gcc cross-compiler to convert into something the assembler under eVC would consume. It errors on all the MAC type of instructions. I looked at www.arm.com (I never knew there could be so many arms) It does not look like the ARM720 has the MAC instructions. It also lists 75Mhz and 100Mhz as possible

Hi all. I am a student writing a voip program on ppc for a project for school. Before I explain my issue, let me apoligize for being extremely newbie :( Here's the situation: I am using the ARMV4 release build from the speex website. Right now I am simply trying to make an encode function using speex that will take an unsigned char* of raw wav data (8000 samples, 8 bits / sample, mono)

Hi folks, I am new with Speex, while looking for Voice Chat in MSN/Yahoo, i cam across Speex. In case of Yahoo, i found Speex with variable bit rate. and in this case, the speex_decode function is not producing any output. Does in case of variable bit rate, something else is to be done with decoding process. Please guide me, what to do. Thanx in advance Lokesh

Hello Jean-Marc >If you want to do it, I can show you >what functions (there are 2-3) to port. Otherwise I might do it >eventually, but it's not a top priority (there's already an SSE version >though). I would indeed like to know which functions can be used to improve K6-2 performance through 3DNow. Cheers Bjoern D. Rasmussen <p><p><p>>From: Jean-Marc

Hello there I'm having trouble decoding speex frames when using 32KHz audio and quality setting 4. If I encode three frames and then decode the three frames then the speex_bits_remaining() still reports that there are bits remaining. All other band modes and qualities reports that the buffer is emptied. Here's an example that shows 4 bits remaing in the buffer after the frames have

In an earlier post I made about learning how to use speex someone nicely responded to me with a Speex Wrapper they had written.. however I am having an issue now where all I seem to hear is a ticking noise after encoding and decoding with speex. It is definitely getting proper data, as if I hit the mic somewhat I hear some extra crackling noises. Now, my code was nearly the same... but...

Simple questions:1. when this method is called for each frame, do I have to call them twice for both the encode process and the decode process?2. does preprocessor do preprocessing on raw PCM data or on encoded speex data? I need to clarify this because i want to know when should I call this function, before the encoding process (i.e. preprocess the pcm data) or after the encoding process (i.e.