similar to: 1.0.3 in ACM soon

Hi Andrey, May be that we don´t understand. I need to transform speex to pocket pc platform. The Windows API is different to Pocket Pc API. Some IDEs that help us to create code for pocket pc, for example, are Visual C++ 3.0 embedded or Visual Studio.Net. Christian will develop this work with Visual C embedded. If you can develop this work quickly or you can guide me step by step, i would be very

Hi Rodrigo, I'm Fabio and i'm in your identical situation, i need Speex to run on PocketPC in real time mode for my tesis. I've to develop a sort of VoIP apllication for pocketPC... I recently discover speex (Only yesterday i joined this mailing list....) and I'm doing many test using mostly VC++ 6.0 but only because i'm still undestandig speex... I did many works with EVC++

Hello Rodrigo, Actually, I have already deleted it... I don't store each test program I wrote within 2 minutes... Well, I don't quite understand, what is the problem for you to do couple of changes in main() function and write WinMain that calls it? I'm sure you could easily make it if you try... Regards, Andrey. ------------------------------------------------------- Andrey Isaev

Hello Rodrigo, R> May be that we don´t understand. I need to transform speex to pocket pc R> platform. The Windows API is different to Pocket Pc API. That's not true. It is VERY similar. At least none of functions that Speex core calls differs. Actually it does not call any Win32 function, it calls stdlib, which is similar on all platform. So, I still don't understand what porting

Hi Fabio, In theory, speex would run in real time, because now it was implemented with integer functions (before only floting point). I'd like test it in my arm processor. I hope to port speex to ppc soon. For your thesis see this link http://www.chl.chalmers.se/~numa/theses/voicemail.pdf Regards, Rodrigo <p>-----Mensaje original----- De: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org

I have started to update the ACM codec to Speex 1.0.3. Before a release I will also address some issues/bugs that have been brought to my attention. Following that I will try to port that code to PocketPC, making use of the unstable 1.1.3 version as integer build. There is probably little or no need for continuing work on my own integer version (called "Sphinx") Christian <p>---

Hello Carl, Can you send me libspeex compilated in eVC. And can you describe where and how set the FIXED_POINT flag in eVC. Thanks you. Regards. Rodrigo. <p>----- Mensaje original ----- De: "Carl Douglas"<CarlD@itouchmobility.com> Env.: 15/01/04 17:43:43 Para: "speex-dev@xiph.org"<speex-dev@xiph.org> Asunto: RE: [speex-dev]

Hi all, Trying to mount an FW800 6TB volumes. The logs say; cannot find hfs+ superblock and volumes larger then 2TB are not supported yet Is my case really because of the >2TB volume? Thanks in advance, - aurf

Thanks, no malloc or free equivalents either (no heap). So, there are no others (to your knowledge) who have built an LLVM backend for a platform with no “normal” stack? I found a presentation about some FPGA work (using LLVM) but it doesn’t seem to apply to my platform. Perhaps someone else on the mailing list will have come across this rarity? Thank you again for your time and

Hi all, I?ve got a HFS+(not journaled) volume connected to my centos6.2 test server, i installed the kmod-hfs(plus) packages and read/write works all fine. but since i?m going to use this for serving mac home folders via netatalk i would like to mount it with support for Extended Attributes and acl?s. so i add user_xattr and acl to my fstab options but then it fails to mount. checking the

Thanks for your response. Please see below. From: Bruce Hoult [mailto:brucehoult at sifive.com] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 5:58 PM To: jjones at prc-hsv.com Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLVM Backend for a platform with no (normal) stack Do you have a register that you can store a memory address >> yes in and

Dear Sir or Ma'am; I have found a wealth of help and information on writing an LLVM backend. And, my platform has no stack. Can you point me to any information that would specifically address creating a backend for this kind of platform? In previous wanderings, I thought I ran across a phrase "platforms with no stack such as FPGAs", but I can't find that mention, now.

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com> > To: "Исаев Виталий Анатольевич" <isaev@fintech.ru> > Cc: libguestfs@redhat.com > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 6:42:23 PM > Subject: Re: [Libguestfs] Libguestfs can't launch with one of the disk images in the RHEV cluster > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:57:35PM

Hey on Centos 5 hfsplus.ko is part of the Kernel: kernel-2.6.18-238.12.1.el5.x86_64 : The Linux kernel (the core of the Linux operating system) Repo : installed Matched from: Filename : /lib/modules/2.6.18-238.12.1.el5/kernel/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus.ko doing a yum provides "*/hfsplus.ko" on CentOS 6 finds nothing. What happened to hfsplus.ko on Centos 6? Thanks, Jerry

I ran into something like this in 3.10.4 and filed two bugs for it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491059 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491060 Please see the above bugs for full detail. In summary, my issue was related to glusterd's pid handling of pid files when is starts self-heal and bricks. The issues are: a. brick pid file leaves stale pid and brick fails

He configurado un servidor samba para trabajar como PDC. Todo esta perfecto, excepto porque, algunos archivos que he colocado en el recurso compartido, y que tienen en su nombre acentos o e?es, son vistos desde los clientes de forma diferente, el nombre de los archivos aparece truncado, y cuando uno intenta abrirlos con un doble click, recibe un mensaje que dice: No se encuentra el recurso.

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:00:32 +0300 > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:33:26PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> >> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:13:25 +0930 >> >> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> >> > >> > For small packets

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:00:32 +0300 > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:33:26PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> >> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:13:25 +0930 >> >> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> >> > >> > For small packets

If we're talking about member variables, just put an m in front of it, problem solved. You already have one for s_, and I didn't see you mention it but I assume you'd want g_ for globals, so m_ makes perfect sense for member variables and there's no question about UB at that point. On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM JD Jones via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

Hello, is anyone successfully sharing a ext3 partition between windows and linux? Which software do you use under (which) windows? Was it easy to setup? TIA and Regards, Helge