similar to: Intel assembly version of SSE instructions

I don't think a compiler is going to be enough. I tried perl scripting the output of a linux gcc cross-compiler to convert into something the assembler under eVC would consume. It errors on all the MAC type of instructions. I looked at www.arm.com (I never knew there could be so many arms) It does not look like the ARM720 has the MAC instructions. It also lists 75Mhz and 100Mhz as possible

Hello there I'm having trouble decoding speex frames when using 32KHz audio and quality setting 4. If I encode three frames and then decode the three frames then the speex_bits_remaining() still reports that there are bits remaining. All other band modes and qualities reports that the buffer is emptied. Here's an example that shows 4 bits remaing in the buffer after the frames have

Bjoern, As far as I understand it, AGC keeps the volume level of the speech elements (i.e. gain) stable no matter how quiet or loud the input becomes- Tom At 10:53 AM 3/28/2004, Bjoern Rasmussen wrote: >Hello > >The st->zeta pointer isn't freed in the speex_preprocess_state_destroy() >function of the preprocess.c file (alloced in line 167). It's in Speex >1.1.4 by

Hello Greg If money isn't a problem Intel has an optimized compiler for eVC and XScale processors http://www.intel.com/software/products/compilers/techtopics/PCA_Optimization_WP.pdf If you have any luck getting the eVC compiler closer to realtime I'd really like to know. I'm still far from realtime when using Speex 1.1.3 on a HP iPAQ (Intel pxa255). Best regards Bjoern D.

Hello The st->zeta pointer isn't freed in the speex_preprocess_state_destroy() function of the preprocess.c file (alloced in line 167). It's in Speex 1.1.4 by the way. I'm trying to make the denoiser work with my application and has got reasonable noise reduction after applying the denoiser. I, however, haven't been able to find any information of what the purpose of

Hello Cesar I'm using Speex on a PPC2002 and PPC2003 with no problems. For tune-up remember to define the FIXED_POINT macro in Project->Settings in eVC. With this setting you ought to be able to at least decode in realtime while using debug-mode. Kind regards Bjoern D. Rasmussen >From: "cesarbremer@raseac.com.br" <cesarbremer@raseac.com.br> >To: speex-dev@xiph.org

Hello I am writing a qdisc scheduler (called fb in the diagram) that does certain packet delaying and other stuff. (for egress traffic) root (htb/tbf) | --------------- cl1 cl2 | tbf -------- | | cl3 cl4 | | *fb* fifo Now I need to

Yes, Chris you're right. It seems that my << operator for int64_t is missing in my '/opt/gcc.3.3/include/c++/3.3/bits/ostream.tcc' file. Which ordinary version of GCC are you working with and how do your definition of the << operator for int64_t look like? /Henrik > >Here is an excerpt from the config.log for LLVM: > >configure:19451: checking for int64_t

Hi Brian, do you know the status of your posted question/problem submitted to binutils maintainers?: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-08/msg00742.html I'm having exactly the same problem on my mingw platform with g++3.3.1 Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ ---

Hi Folks Please review this link: http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.mspx#EKAA As I see it, no one should use code copied from Microsoft directly, unless you are explicitly sure it is for private or non-commercial use or a permission is specifically granted for the purpose. And for that matter, no one can be sure if you rewrite code, not to infringe patents - as they adhere to

Hi Interix does not know MAP_ANON or -NOCORE only MAP_SHARED, -PRIVATE and -FIXED. Henrik _________________________________________________________________ F� alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.dk/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Memory.cpp.zip Type: application/x-zip-compressed Size: 495 bytes Desc: not

>Here are the FreeBSD and Win32 versions of TimeValue.cpp (along with all >the other Win32 changes I've submitted that have yet to be comitted). Please give me a hint when the files are committed... I have some fixes to commit, too. Thanks. Henrik _________________________________________________________________ F� alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger

============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ =============================================================

Hi Jeff, _HEAPOK is unknown to mingw 1.0 (which is the official release). Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/

Hi, This minor patch clarify matters in the CFEBuildInstrs.html file in my view. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/

Here is an excerpt from the config.log: configure:19451: checking for int64_t configure:19476: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 configure:19479: $? = 0 configure:19482: test -s conftest.o configure:19485: $? = 0 configure:19496: result: yes configure:19511: checking for uint64_t configure:19536: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 configure:19539: $? = 0 configure:19542: test -s conftest.o

>From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> >Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:26:09 -0700 > >Okay, so the question is, how do you do the equivalent of a MAP_ANON >allocation on Interix. We don't want to map a file here. We're just asking >for virtual memory (unbacked by swap or file) to be allocated to the >process. Is there a way to do that on Interix? The

Hi, Today I've succeded in compiling the llvm-tools, llvm-gcc and stacker frontend and in installing it. Uptill now I've followed the steps given in: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html with modifications for the mingw platform. I'll return with step-by-step instructions how to do it on this platform. Cheers Henrik :)

This is one of the reasons I'm getting rid of the "platform" link. I'm not sure what platform you're working on, but on Cygwin it causes problems. Cygwin doesn't like .. through a soft link and generates incorrect file names. I imagine this is what is happening to the dependencies. In any event, the "platform" link will be gone before the new year. Sorry for

Hi >From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> >Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:43:27 -0500 (CDT) >Ah, suddenly everything makes sense. If you're interested in LLVM on the >windows platform, *please* get CVS. Last night I've got the latest version of LLVM from CVS and now porting LLVM to Interix from this version on. I got this error: --------------------- gmake[1]: