Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "seeking a Speex programmer for Windows"
2004 Aug 06
0
seeking a Speex programmer for Windows
> I am searching for a programmer whom I can hire to develop a simple Speex audio recording and playback
> program for use in Windows. If anyone is interested in this project, please contact me at
> extrastuff123@aol.com for more details. If you know of anyone who might be capable and available for hire,
> please let them know of this offer. Thank you for your help.
Windows Sound
2004 Aug 06
1
Speex, what container?
The aplication that I am developing is like a sound recorder (goes directly to the soundboard and start capturing the sound and writing the file, using the directsound api). I'm already capable of writing to normal wav files but I wanted to encode the audio with speex to have smaller size (and still good quality).
How can I write the wav files with speex content using the ACM codec? (like
2004 Aug 06
2
Thread Safety
> Yes, i have been using speex in my VoIP gateway product. There are
> hundreds of threads that simultaneously call various speex APIs and
> execute without any problem. But ofcourse, I use a speex encoder/decoder
> vars on per stream basis. Its been tested successfully on Linux/Win2k.
Actually, I just realized I fixed a potential minor thread problem
recently. It's in 1.1.1
2004 Aug 06
1
speex for windows mobile 2003
good day. i am an undergraduate student of electronics and
communications engineering and i would like to use SPEEX for my
thesis, which is to create a software that will record speech in
speex-compatible format for windows mobile 2003.(pocketpc devices) my
pocket pc has an inherent sound recorder but i am going to make a
sound recorder software specifically for speech files so that
recordings
2005 Mar 07
2
How can we ring a bell in Windows?
Hello useRs,
Is there a way to write code in R
to ring a bell in Windows?
Best regards,
C. Joseph Lu
Department of Statistics
National Cheng-Kung University
Tainan, Taiwan
ROC
_______________________________________________________________________
2004 Aug 06
1
seeking
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:20:01AM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> > I need to know if it is possible to seek the Speex stream. I want to have an
> > ability to seek in time, just like Vorbis does. Vorbis has function
> > "ov_time_seek" and I want something like this from Speex. Is this possible?
> > Thanks for any reply.
>
> It's not really a feature
2004 Aug 06
2
Thread Safety
Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> Never been tested but it should be. I don't use static variables (except
> read-only which is OK).
Are they actually read-only or are they initialized once? In the latter
case, you need to protect the initialization section...
<p>Segher
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To
2004 Aug 06
1
Thread Safety
Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> > Are they actually read-only or are they initialized once? In the latter
> > case, you need to protect the initialization section...
>
> No, they're written to every time you enter the lsp_quant_* routines
> below. The only reason why this isn't catastrophic is that even wrong
> values (two threads writing at the same time) will only
2004 Aug 06
3
seeking
Hi,
I need to know if it is possible to seek the Speex stream. I want to have an
ability to seek in time, just like Vorbis does. Vorbis has function
"ov_time_seek" and I want something like this from Speex. Is this possible?
Thanks for any reply.
Rado
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this
2004 May 06
4
Playing GSM files in Windows
For the archives...
In trying to play GSM files in Windows (Windows XP for me, but in
general) I found no help on Google, so when I figured it out I thought I
would post it here.
Q: How do I play GSM Files in Windows?
A: Use Quicktime, it supports the GSM audio format directly.
Andy Farnsworth
farnsaw@stonedoor.com
2004 Aug 06
6
Speex wishlist
Hi,
Speex is getting close to beta4, which I'd like to be feature-complete
(or as close as possible). That's why I'd like to ask if anyone here has
needs for a feature that hasn't been implemented yet. If so, please let
me know.
For those interested, here's what's going to be in beta4. First, the VBR
code has been greatly improved and now works good with wideband too.
2004 Aug 06
1
Speex ACM Format Tag
Is there a registered ACM format tag for Speex encoded audio? I am in charge of an application which can store Speex audio in a stream in an AVI file and I would like to use the official format tag if there is one so that some day it will be playable using some forthcoming ACM codec.
Thanks,
Keith
________________________________________________
Keith Looney
Senior Software Engineer
On2
2020 May 07
2
Ld64.lld cannot find Foundation framework
Dear LLVM community I need some help please.
I want to use LLVM's clang and lld within a MacOSX sandboxed app. This is because sandboxing does not allow calls to /usr/bin/clang.
The clang binary works fine to compile a file, but ld64.lld comes up with the error "cannot find framework".
However similar arguments using /usr/bin/ld instead of ld64.lld works fine.
Here are the
2008 Dec 05
3
[LLVMdev] Build errors on trunk for about a week now.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:58 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:57 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> / * snip */
>>
>> Actually, rebuilding it makes "debug tblgen" fail with the errors at
>> the
2010 Jan 31
3
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question
Thanks for responding, Duncan, and clarifying that y'all need more info
to help.
I'm trying to compile binaries on os x 10.5.8 intel hardware that are
compatible on ppc os x 10.4.
When I include various flags to llvm-gcc, including: -m32 -arch ppc
-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOS10.4u.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.4
I am seeing errors when compiling using llvm-gcc 4.2.
If I leave out
2016 Oct 08
2
cmake 3.7.0-rc1 breaks stage2 bootstrap in openmp on 10.11 with Xcode 8
The new cmake 3.7.0-rc1 release produces a stage2 bootstrap failure in
openmp project build on OS X 10.11 under Xcode 8....
In file included from
/sw/src/fink.build/llvm40-4.0.0-1/llvm-4.0.0.src/projects/openmp/runtime/src/kmp_alloc.c:16:
In file included from
/sw/src/fink.build/llvm40-4.0.0-1/llvm-4.0.0.src/projects/openmp/runtime/src/kmp.h:98:
2004 Aug 06
4
input format
just to check that I've got everything right.
the encoder allows as input
- mono only
- 8 or 16 bits as floating point numbers (without scaling to 1.0).
floating-point wavs (IEEE) will also work, but it's better to scale
them to something like 8000.
- any sample rate (should be set with speex_encoder_ctl), but prefered
are 8/16/32 kHz. but what modes should I use for a given rate?
also
-
2009 Jan 14
2
[LLVMdev] quick q configuring osx
Le 14 janv. 09 à 21:48, Chris Lattner a écrit :
>
> On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Graham Wakefield wrote:
>
>> Sorry if this is a newb q... I'm developing an application on a
>> 10.5 machine but want to target the 10.4 SDK. Is there a magic
>> incantation for the llvm configure script to set the sysroot path,
>> equivalent to e.g. --with-sysroot
2009 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] configuring LLVM 2.6 for OSX 10.4sdk on OSX 10.5 system
Hi all,
(Sorry if the answer to this is obvious - and thanks in advance~)
Short version:
linker error of _backtrace from LLVMSystem.a building a dynamic
library embedding LLVM/clang, both against the OSX 10.4 sdk.
Long version:
I've just tried rebuilding my project using the 2.6 release, using the
following commands to try and force LLVM to build against the OSX 10.4
sdk (I am
2009 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] quick q configuring osx
Hi,
For the record, adding
UNIVERSAL_SDK_PATH=/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk/
was insufficient to restrict the .a/.o files to link against the 10.4
sdk, but
env MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.4 make
did the trick.
Thanks!
On Jan 14, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
>
> Le 14 janv. 09 à 21:48, Chris Lattner a écrit :
>
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM,