similar to: [Fwd: Re: Documentation translators]

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-devel/attachments/20050604/bee263f3/signature.bin

This is becoming a FAQ and should probably be added to the docs. Thanks, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ teastep@shorewall.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 16:09:01 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: Carl Spelkens

On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Ron Shannon wrote: > > I am ready to begin the documentation changes for 1.3.2. Are > > you close to > > having any of your changes ready for release? If so, we can > > get those into > > CVS before I begin my changes -- if not, then I''ll go ahead > > and update CVS > > with the 1.3.2 material. > > > >

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-devel/attachments/20050615/ab14c236/signature.bin

I''m beginning to believe that the use of the last column in the rules file to designate redirection/forwarding is too subtle for many users. For 1.3, I think I''ll do something like the following: Current rule: ACCEPT net loc:192.168.1.3 tcp 80 - all New rule: FORWARD net loc:192.168.1.3 tcp 80 Current rule: ACCEPT net fw::3128 tcp 80 - all New rule: REDIRECT net

Anyone else seeing this?? Thanks, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

Hi folks, Over the weekend Ron has made some good progress with functionality available at http://devel.shorewall.net, and i''ve converted all of the content i had placed at http://shorewall.dyndns.org (which is now a redirect to the former). Please have a look around and give your feedback, either here or on the site itself. -- Paul <http://paulgear.webhop.net> -- Did you know?

---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Date: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 06:58:27 PM -0600 From: Aaron Axelsen <axelseaa@amadmax.com> To: shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net Cc: Subject: [Shorewall-users] Offical Shorewall Support Forum -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 DeveloperCube is a new project started by veterans of the web development industry. We are proud to announce

Anyone know how/where we can get some? It has been raised before: http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2004-July/013594.html I''d like to see an IRC or Jabber service for both support and development. -- Paul <http://paulgear.webhop.net> -- Did you know? OpenOffice.org has built-in PDF creation. Better yet, it''s compatible with Microsoft Office, and

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-devel/attachments/20041014/45aef157/attachment-0001.bin

I had expected to be out of town this weekend so when I plans suddenly changed, I responded to a nudge from a list member and investigated means for stripping html from list posts. It turns out that MailMan 2.1 has this capability and since I run MailMan for my list server, that seemed like a good fit. After a couple false starts trying to upgrade, I think that I have it running. One thing

Hi folks, I''m conducting a straw poll for your opinions on whether we should send CVS commit logs (probably with diffs) to the shorewall-devel list, or to another (new) list? I can see advantages to both ways: separate lists mean that people who aren''t contributing code don''t get flooded with code noise, but a single list will help keep everyone involved in the

FYI... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall Date: Thursday 23 September 2004 07:44 From: "Jonathan Schneider" <jon@clearconcepts.ca> To: "''Tom Eastep''" <teastep@shorewall.net> I must have been up too late working on this, looking at it the next day I noticed I completely forgot

---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] strange UDP scan results on a Shorewall=20 firewall Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 08:33:20 -0800 From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: "Scott Duncan" <sduncan@cytechconsult.com> On Saturday 02 March 2002 04:30 am, Scott Duncan wrote: > Yes, the net->all policy is the same on all three (REJECT log

------------ Forwarded Message ------------ Date: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:19 AM +0100 From: Lorenzo Martignoni To: Tom Eastep Subject: shorewall 1.3.13-3 I built a new debian version for shorewall-1.3.13: shorewall (1.3.13-3) unstable; urgency=high * fixed a bug in shorewall.conf: SHARED_DIR was pointing to the old location of shorewall scripts, now moved to

And Andrew -- PLEASE don''t reply off-list. I''m not a private help desk... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 19:01:34 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: andrew

The versions of the CVS ''firewall'' script in both the /Shorewall and /STABLE threads corrects the problem described in the attached post. These scripts should be installed on the 1.4.7 Beta and 1.4.6c releases respectively. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net -------------- next

FYI -- A small blurb on page 45. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Shorewall in (IN)SECURE Magazine Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:10:51 +0200 From: Mirko Zorz <mirko.zorz@net-security.org> To: teastep@shorewall.net Hello Tom, I thought you would be interested to know that Shorewall has been featured in the Software Spotlight section of the third issue of (IN)SECURE, a free security

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:05 AM > To: Steve Herber > Cc: Shorewall Development > Subject: Re: [Shorewall-devel] RE: [Shorewall-users] SMTP outbound > problem (fwd) > > > On Mon, 13 May 2002, Steve Herber wrote: > > > I think we should add an FAQ entry for tcp_ecn. > >

FYI This bug will prevent ''shorewall restore'' from working if you have "!<single IP address>" in the ORIGINAL DEST column. -Tom ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet Date: Wednesday 14 September 2005 15:09 From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org The conntrack