Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Re: Some simple questions"
2004 Aug 06
3
Some simple questions
I'm being PHBed into a VOIP project, and Speex sprang to mind. Bandwidth is
going to be a fairly serious issue for us. With regards to a Speex
enc/decoder, I was wondering: Rick Kane and David Siebert have already asked
about this, but seem to have gotten very different responses - the former a
call to arms, and the latter a "well, if you do it, it'll get done." What's
the
2006 Oct 11
2
Nelly Moser Asao Codec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hello everybody,
first of all I want to excuse myself for crossposting. I can't estimate
which mailinglist could be the right one for our concern.
Struktur AG, member of the Linux Solutions Group e.V., wants to announce
an Open Source tender for an implementation of an audio codec compatible
with Nellymoser Asao Codec. Struktur wants to pay
2006 Oct 11
2
Nelly Moser Asao Codec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hello everybody,
first of all I want to excuse myself for crossposting. I can't estimate
which mailinglist could be the right one for our concern.
Struktur AG, member of the Linux Solutions Group e.V., wants to announce
an Open Source tender for an implementation of an audio codec compatible
with Nellymoser Asao Codec. Struktur wants to pay
2006 Oct 11
1
Re: Nelly Moser Asao Codec
Has anyone ever successfully re-implemented a proprietary codec without
reverse engineering or decompiling? Or even with reverse engineering? I
imagine even if you had the exact code, getting the codebooks without
decompiling would be pretty tough.
Jean-Marc
xiphmont@xiph.org a ?crit :
> This seems like a relevant posting to me, no apologies necessary.
>
> I do ahve one question; does
2006 Oct 11
1
Re: Nelly Moser Asao Codec
Has anyone ever successfully re-implemented a proprietary codec without
reverse engineering or decompiling? Or even with reverse engineering? I
imagine even if you had the exact code, getting the codebooks without
decompiling would be pretty tough.
Jean-Marc
xiphmont@xiph.org a ?crit :
> This seems like a relevant posting to me, no apologies necessary.
>
> I do ahve one question; does
2004 May 17
0
write list bug reports [was Re: OTHER BUG IN SAMBA 3.0.4?! FORCE USE
Hi jerry, and hi everyone !!!
I've seen the bug 1319 has appeared...
(Remember I previously applied the 1315 ?)
Has this one something to do with ADS domain member and winbind
authentification for shares ?
Thanks for reading !
Regards to the Samba Team !
Bertram
>From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <jerry@samba.org>
>To: antonio@kabaya.homelinux.org
>CC:
2006 Feb 22
1
Speex support on ARM
Hi everyone,
Ever since the iPaqs at handhelds.org went offline, the ARM port of
Speex hasn't really been maintained. So I'm calling people interested in
ARM/Speex for help. Could someone interested be kind enough to either:
1) Give me acccess to his Linux/ARM machine
2) Tell me where I can access such a setup
3) Send me an ARM device that can run Linux
Thanks,
Jean-Marc
2007 Jul 22
2
Server Side AEC
Hi Jean-Marc,
Regarding you points:
1) Is it ok if the audio is encoded (using Nelly Moser ASAO) and sent to the client and decoded when it is recevied so the AEC is always performed on raw PCM16 8KHZ ?
2) The audio is moved in 32ms (512 byte) chunks and the reading and writing to the AEC code will be done by separate threads at regular 32 ms intervals.
3) Occasionaly audio is
2015 Jan 13
0
When will CentOS Publish Errata?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 13.01.2015 04:25, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS wrote:
>> On 2015-01-06, Keith Keller wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>> 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN
>>>> we could properly publish that data in some way.
>>>
>>>
2012 May 07
0
[PATCH] Optionally, allow distros to use openssl for MD5 verification
Cristian Rodr?guez <crrodriguez at opensuse.org> wrote:
> El 07/05/12 06:23, Miroslav Lichvar escribi?:
> > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 05:34:31PM -0400, Cristian Rodr?guez wrote:
> >> This has the advantage of being more efficient than the included
Btw, how much more efficient and on what hardware?
Based on previous experience (in a project not related to FLAC) on
x86_64
2007 Jul 22
1
Server Side AEC
The client is the adobe flash player. No install and on 98% of all desktops but we can't change it.
It works ok if people use headphones but we need to stop the howl than can build up if more than one person in a conference has mic to close to speakers.
Any ideas?
Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote:
> 1) Is it ok if the audio is encoded (using
2007 Jul 22
0
Server Side AEC
> 1) Is it ok if the audio is encoded (using Nelly Moser ASAO) and sent
> to the client and decoded when it is recevied so the AEC is always
> performed on raw PCM16 8KHZ ?
No. The entire path from AEC to loudspeaker and from mic back to AEC
must be free of any non-linearity, codec, drift, ...
> 2) The audio is moved in 32ms (512 byte) chunks and the reading and
> writing to the
2016 Nov 02
2
Request - Javascript player using Media Source Extensions
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a javascript player that uses Media Source Extensions to play Icecast streams on modern browsers.
Based on my limited research, the following players do not seem to support Icecast streams:
Aurora.js - Icecast does not support HEAD requests, which Aurora.js seems to require.
Shaka - Needs DASH manifests, cannot play off a simple URL. IANAL but MPEG LA seems to
2006 Sep 17
1
R-base licensing question
It is my understanding that R is licensed under the GPL with the
exception of a few header files for the purposes of linking binary code
with R under non-GPL licenses.
However, the R-base package itself is licensed under the GPL, as are
many (but not all) packages in CRAN. Furthermore, basically any R
script will use functionality from R-base. As I understand it, the
situation isn't
2012 May 07
3
[PATCH] Optionally, allow distros to use openssl for MD5 verification
El 07/05/12 06:23, Miroslav Lichvar escribi?:
> On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 05:34:31PM -0400, Cristian Rodr?guez wrote:
>> This has the advantage of being more efficient than the included
>> routines and allows distros to centralize crypto mainteniance on
>> a few libraries.
>
> Isn't the OpenSSL license incompatible with GPL? IANAL, but I think
> the flac and
2014 Mar 05
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] C++11 reverse iterators (was C++11 is here)
On 2014 Mar 2, at 22:27, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
>
> On Mar 2, 2014, at 8:53 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > On 3 March 2014
2011 Jul 08
1
CentOS 6 (and 5.6) doc on http://www.centos.org/docs
Hi documentation team,
As CentOS 6 is now being released to the mirrors, it would be a good
time to think about putting the accurate documentation on
http://www.centos.org/docs
Red Hat changed their documentation license in the past and they are now
using the CC-by-SA license.
My own understanding (but IANAL) is that we can just share the
documentation , and just linking back to upstream
2007 Jul 23
0
Re:Speex-dev Digest, Vol 38, Issue 21
Hi, I am very glad to enter this mail list. i am a new guy,i am interested in speech coding.so is there anybody working on this ? please contact me,thank you.i am studing on fixed codebook search. and i have read almost all the articals(including patent on this) about codebook search. but i found that all the suboptimize methods have their own flaw. could anybody have some comments on
2015 Jul 30
1
[LLVMdev] Bi-Endian Compiler
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Herbie Robinson
<HerbieRobinson at verizon.net> wrote:
> I have been quietly working on a port of LLVM to Stratus VOS. The OS is
> always big endian (because customers need to migrate data to new hardware
> quickly and can't afford to convert). This entails presenting a big endian
> programming model no matter what the hardware does. We
2007 Jul 14
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4-2 development branch is open
Hi Chris,
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > Do you want in-tree changelogs for LLVM changes that touch general
> > gcc files (i.e. outside the llvm* files), like Apple maintains in
> > ChangeLog.apple? Hopefully not!
>
> I have never understood the use of GCC-style changelogs. Regardless,
> we never kept them for llvm-gcc 4.0, so I don't think we