Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches similar to: "Re: Please confirm your message"
2004 Aug 06
0
Re: Please confirm your message
icecast+confirm+1051184875.16372.42e2b6@xiph.org
<p><p><p><p>>From: icecast@xiph.org
>To: mourad_123@hotmail.com
>Subject: Please confirm your message
>Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 07:47:55 -0400
>
>Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org.
>We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of
>"Re: Please confirm your
2004 Aug 06
0
Re: Please confirm your message
"mourad mourad"
<mourad_123@hotm To: icecast@xiph.org
ail.com> cc:
2004 Aug 06
0
Re: Please confirm your message
>"icecasat pb.".
<p><p><p><p>>From: icecast@xiph.org
>To: mourad_123@hotmail.com
>Subject: Please confirm your message
>Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 07:39:07 -0400
>
>Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org.
>We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of
>"icecasat pb.".
>
>Please send a
2024 Sep 23
0
bit, bit64, ff and greeNsort
Dear package maintainers,
Dear users of packages `bit`, `bit64`, `ff`,
Everyone interested in sustainable sorting algorithms,
I submitted updated versions for the upcoming R 4.5.0. The are only
minor changes (see the NEWS files) but there is one important change in
bit64:
??? o setting options(integer64_semantics="new")
????? gives the better semantics suggested by Ofek Shilon.
2024 Sep 23
0
bit, bit64, ff and greeNsort
Dear package maintainers,
Dear users of packages `bit`, `bit64`, `ff`,
Everyone interested in sustainable sorting algorithms,
I submitted updated versions for the upcoming R 4.5.0. The are only
minor changes (see the NEWS files) but there is one important change in
bit64:
??? o setting options(integer64_semantics="new")
????? gives the better semantics suggested by Ofek Shilon.
2012 Nov 29
1
Hacked by Microsoft?
This morning someone tried to make sip call through my Asterisk. My
server just drop these calls and record them in CDR with IP address:
2012-11-28 06:30:51 SIP/216... 1000 "1000" <1000> Hangup
999011972592249388 ANSWERED 00:01 Hacker: 168.63.67.239
2. 2012-11-28 06:30:49 SIP/216... 1000 "1000" <1000> Hangup
88011972592249388 ANSWERED 00:01 Hacker:
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
remove unix password sync = yes
Reply on a question....
http://www.mail-archive.com/redhat-devel-list@redhat.com/msg04223.html
Good Luck,
Ries
Return-Path: <ries@franksintl.nl>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl
[195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
6771C4AC8 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 17
2004 Aug 06
0
[OpenH323]BUG NOT CORRECTED
Hi.
I've found a large bug in Speex Codec implementation in Openh323 code.
I've signalled this bug in the Openh323 site, in the section "Report bugs".
THE BUG NUMBER IS 143!
Everybody can verify that the report is arrived monday 7 July!!!!! But no
one has analyze this bug....!!!!
So the result is: Openh323 implements Speex Codec that runs with wrong bit
rates and that