similar to: Frozen upper spectrum in WB VBR CNG

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Frozen upper spectrum in WB VBR CNG"

2004 Aug 06
1
Frozen upper spectrum in WB VBR CNG
Jean-Marc Valin (jean-marc.valin@hermes.usherb.ca) wrote: > > > I've been using Speex in my voice-over-IP program on Win32, in > > wideband (16kHz) mode. I just starting using VBR recently and > > have run into something that might be a problem within Speex: > > Are you turning on DTX in addition to VBR? Also, what version are you > using. As of 1.0, DTX is
2004 Aug 06
0
Frozen upper spectrum in WB VBR CNG
Great, thanks! That patch solved it. VBR without DTX seems to work perfectly now. If I enable DTX, there's still a little bit of buzz but it doesn't seem to last very long when it happens. I appreciate the quick fix! Tom Jean-Marc Valin (jean-marc.valin@hermes.usherb.ca) wrote: > > Yep, you found a bug and here's the patch. It should solve your problem > (using VBR
2006 Oct 24
2
Does VAD/DTX work without VBR and Preprocessor
Hello, I'm try to run speex on some ARM processor. I'd like to cut away some speex features including VBR, ABR and preprocessor while still supporting VAD/DTX. But I've found some puzzles in the source code regarding VAD as below, 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. Will VAD still work If I don't use the source file preprocess.c? 2)The speex manual
2006 Oct 24
1
Does VAD/DTX work without VBR and Preprocessor
Hi Marc, Thanks for your quick response. So if VAD is enabled then VBR will be enable although it's a special VBR. How about take out the VAD code from the VBR and remove the code else? Lianghu On 10/24/06, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > > 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. > > Will VAD still work If I
2019 Apr 01
2
API for checking whether the encoder is in DTX (PR #107)
Hi everyone, Some time ago, I sent a pull request <https://github.com/xiph/opus/pull/107> to the Opus github page. Jean-Marc asked me to post it to the mailing list so everyone can have a look at it. You can find the description and code changes below. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Best regards Gustaf Ullberg In WebRTC, we would like to be able to
2019 Apr 08
3
API for checking whether the encoder is in DTX (PR #107)
Thank you Mark. I agree and have now updated the pull request with a new commit, addressing your comments. Please take a look. /Gustaf On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 11:41, Mark Harris <mark.hsj at gmail.com> wrote: > On 2019-04-01 3:37, Gustaf Ullberg wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Some time ago, I sent a pull request > > <https://github.com/xiph/opus/pull/107>
2010 Sep 04
1
Possible malformed G729B - SID (VAD/DTX) frames from carrier endpoint ?
Hello, We are in the process of debugging a voice quality issue for a client of ours that is a VoIP services provider. The client uses a softphone that runs on a pjsip stack. When placing a call using the softphone, it negotiates the use of G729 codec with the remote endpoint (ptime = 20ms). The endpoint transmits RTP packets with encoded G729 payload. VAD/DTX is enabled. We see that the last
2004 Nov 17
3
Jitter buffer
Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >>Heh. I guess after playing with different jitter buffers long enough, >>I've realized that there's always situations that you haven't properly >>accounted for when designing one. >> >> > >For example? :-) > > I have a bunch of examples listed on the wiki page where I had written initial specifications:
2003 Sep 09
1
Should Speex VBR Introduce Distortion?
Hi All, I've run into a small hiccup in encoding my audios with Speex. When I encode audience laughter and applause with 'speexenc' (version 1.0.1), the result is quite acceptable... until I enable VBR. Then it distorts horribly. My understanding of VBR is that it frees the encoder to vary the number of bits emitted to better maintain the quality requested, and so I would have
2004 Aug 06
3
Error in my code
Hi I apologise if the following message is inappropriate for this list. However, I feel this is the only place where I can get some help with my problem. BOOL CALLBACK RecordProc(HRECORD hRecord, void *buffer, DWORD length, DWORD user) { try { long sent = 0; long inputOffset = 0; long outputOffset = 0; long nbBytes = 0; char *outputBuffer = NULL;
2001 Aug 13
1
Spectrum display in Winamp
Hi, This is my first post here after a long time lurking, so here goes:- First of all, congratulations to the development team, Ogg Vorbis sounds great. Keep up the good work! I have a question regarding Peter's Winamp plugin. When I view the spectrum display (the one inside the Winamp window) when playing back a .ogg file, the bars aren't as responsive compared to the .wav file
2004 Aug 06
2
--dtx alone does nothing?
I'm running a: for band in n w u do for quality in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 do for complexity in 3 do for vad in "" "--vad" do for dtx in "" "--dtx" do echo speexenc -${band} --quality ${quality} --comp ${complexity} ${vad} ${dtx} input.${band}.wav
2006 Jan 17
2
Recommended GUI for Speex
Hi all, I have recently added Speex support to my app (http://sbooth.org/Max/) and am in the process of creating a GUI for the user to control the codec parameters. I am new to Speex and as such I am not really sure which parameters are more important than others, and deserve prominent placement, etc. Is there a recommended GUI for people to follow or use as an example? Stephen
2004 Nov 17
1
Jitter buffer
Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >>In particular, (I'm not really sure, because I don't thorougly >>understand it yet) I don't think your jitterbuffer handles: >> >>DTX: discontinuous transmission. >> >> > >That is dealt with by the codec, at least for Speex. When it stops >receiving packets, it already knows whether it's in DTX/CNG mode.
2003 Jun 10
5
Calling for 5.1 Mastering experience! (vorbis ambisonics and 5.1)
I've been doing a fair amount of work with Vorbis support for Ambisonics, which seems to be going along nicely. It seems that there is signifant interest in coding 5.1 material with Vorbis esp as tarkin becomes more complete, so I've decided to take a break from pure ambisonic work to look into this. I've decided that the best (from a pure elegance and patent avoidance) way to handle
2003 Jun 10
5
Calling for 5.1 Mastering experience! (vorbis ambisonics and 5.1)
I've been doing a fair amount of work with Vorbis support for Ambisonics, which seems to be going along nicely. It seems that there is signifant interest in coding 5.1 material with Vorbis esp as tarkin becomes more complete, so I've decided to take a break from pure ambisonic work to look into this. I've decided that the best (from a pure elegance and patent avoidance) way to handle
2004 Aug 06
2
DTX in speech
Hello, I am trying to use the DTX feature of speex to tell if the user is speaking. I have VBR, DTX and VAD turned on, but the function speex_encode always returns a non-zero value. It is my understanding that it should return a zero value when the encoder detects silence? Could anyone give me any clues to help figure out why this isn't working for me? I am using the 1.13 version of speex on
2005 Jul 20
4
Alternatives to Digium 729
Per my conversation below with digium, are there any legal alternatives to digium's G729? It is out of date, and doesn't support VAD nor silence detection. Digium has stated that they have no plans to update it anytime soon. VAD/Silence is a big deal with major carriers and we are having to fight a battle to get them to make special arrangements to turn off VAD/Silence in their
2004 Nov 22
2
Problem with fax tone (CNG) from TxFax and busy detect
I'm losing call files in /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing because * isn't able to detect the busy signal. The call file looks like this: Channel: Zap/g2/3036701917 MaxRetries: 1000 RetryTime: 60 WaitTime: 45 Application: TxFAX Data: <filename>.tiff|caller Using the "|caller" parameter, TxFax injects the fax tone (CNG) onto the line. With the CNG tone, asterisk is unable
2007 Aug 25
1
asterisk and vad/cng
Hi List, i've set up a cisco 7912 for my asterisk box. I've had problems with VAD and CNG. After googling a bit, i've found an article about asterisk not supporting these two protocols, therefore it's better to turn them off. Since then i did not found answer to my two questions, maybe somebody here could help me: a) am i even able to turn off vad/cng on cisco 7912? SIP