similar to: Where can I find the implementation of function speex_encode( )

I'm completely new to speex and I'm having issues adding it to my application. I can pass raw PCM and that works fine so I know my transmission code is fine however when I try to encode/decode using speex I get noise almost like a whining/buzzing sound. I'm sure it's and issue in my code but I'm not sure where to start looking other then my gut tells me I'm not sizing or

Alright noted, I changed me code so that the state is created in the constructor and destroyed in the destructor of the object. However I'm still getting the same issue although I'm sure that would have bit me sooner or later. The new code is as follows. virtual Enigma::u8* Encode(Enigma::u8* inputBuffer,size_t inputSize, size_t& outputSize) { short *in=(short*)inputBuffer;

Hi all, i've to encode voice from a voicemodem. I choose speex 1.0.5 for its quality in voice encoding. I've tried to implement an encoder but unsuccesfully. Here's my code: /* ============ SPEEX stream ENCODER ============================================ */ int SPEEX_EncodePCM(struct _IDA_ClientSocket *IDA,char *buffer,unsigned char *PCM,int num_samples) { /* buffer point to the

I'm only doing one frame using speex_encode_int greatly simplifies my code I'm not sure why the sample I was working off of was converting the shorts to floats then calling the other encode/decode methods. Based off of your suggestions I tried the following but I get the same result. virtual Enigma::u8* Encode(Enigma::u8* inputBuffer,size_t inputSize, size_t& outputSize) {

openh323 speexcodec.cxx has: BOOL SpeexCodec::EncodeFrame(BYTE * buffer, unsigned & length) { // convert PCM to float float floatData[SAMPLES_PER_FRAME]; PINDEX i; for (i = 0; i < SAMPLES_PER_FRAME; i++) floatData[i] = sampleBuffer[i]; // encode PCM data in sampleBuffer to buffer speex_bits_reset(bits); speex_encode(coder_state, floatData, bits);

Hi, I've attached a patch against SVN r14645 which adds GCC visibility information to all symbols exported from libspeex.so and libspeexdsp.so. It includes a configure.ac change to test that both the compiler flags and __attribute__((visibility)) works, and if so will #define EXPORT __attribute__((visibility("default"))) and if not #define EXPORT I've attached a diff output

Hi, I've attached a patch against SVN r14645 which adds GCC visibility information to all symbols exported from libspeex.so and libspeexdsp.so. It includes a configure.ac change to test that both the compiler flags and __attribute__((visibility)) works, and if so will #define EXPORT __attribute__((visibility("default"))) and if not #define EXPORT I've attached a diff output

Hi, i know this question has already been asked, i've checked mailing list logs but ... I didn't figure out the solution for my question. I want to use basic functionnality of speex, only VAD, no pre/post filter, even no VBR. But i *really* want to use less mem/cpu i can. So in which format should i pass data to speex_encode(_int) , float or short ? I quickly looked at the source code

I'm confused about the format of the PCM/WAV data for speex_encode & speex_decode speex_encode(enc_state, input_frame, &bits); In the manual, it says "input_frame is a (float *) pointing to the beginning of a speech frame" (for encode) But I've found that in speexenc.c and testenc.c, short* is used instead of float* So, isn't it signed 16 bit samples(if

Hi Marian, I took a brief look at RFC 5574 and as far as I understand, you can simply do it like this: SpeexBits b; speex_encode(state, some320bytePCM1, &b); speex_encode(state, some320bytePCM2, &b); After that, get the encoded data with speex_bits_write and put it in your packet. Mark -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at

Hi, I first report the installing error to the r-sig-mac mailing list but it seems nobody ever encounter this annoying problem and I got no replies. so I am trying to forward it to this list, hope it never bothers. Anyone had the same problem, or what does the warning message mean ? Thank you in advance ! Begin forwarded message: > From: Peng Jiang <jp021@sjtu.edu.cn> > Date:

The way I do this is to compute the number of frames (by dividing the size of my input by the number of bytes per frame and then calling speex_encode_int() that many times. Something like speex_bits_reset( &bits ); for( n = 0; n < num_frames; ++n ) { speex_encode_int( enc_state, (int16_t*)input_tail,

At just a first quick glance, I'm pretty sure that you don't want to be creating and destroying the speex encoder/decoder with each frame. That's supposed to stay the same for more-or-less the entire session. Ken Smith Cell: 425-443-2359 Email: ken at alanta.com Blog: http://blog.wouldbetheologian.com/ On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Christopher Schaefer <disks86 at

I've targeted Speex to run under eCos with Thumb interworking using arm-elf-gcc 3.3.3 I'd written a small test case to verifiy the operation: #include <speex/speex.h> void speex_test(void) { SpeexBits bits; unsigned int frame_size; void *enc_state; float *speex_frame; cyg_uint64 t1, t2; int i; speex_frame = (float *)0x00030000; /* Address of Speex data

On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:18:16PM +0200, crazylord wrote: > Hi, i know this question has already been asked, i've checked mailing > list logs but ... > I didn't figure out the solution for my question. > > I want to use basic functionnality of speex, only VAD, no pre/post > filter, even no VBR. But i *really* want to use less mem/cpu i can. > So in which format

When I just copy the microphone input buffer to the output buffer the sound plays OK. But if I encode and decode the buffer through Speex I get a high pitched constant tone in the background. I actually do hear my voice speaking when I talk, but it's faint and much quieter than the tone. Here's what my data looks like: Input is the first 5 floats of each input buffer. Output is

Thanks, it makes more sense to me now. Does speex_bit_read_from also append in that manner? Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > speex_bits_reset is before encoding, not decoding. If you don't call it, > then everything you encode will be appended so it will grow without end. > As for the point of the SpeexBits struct, it's there as a sort of "array > of bits" to it's easy

The example in the documentation demonstrates using speex_bits_reset before encoding and decoding each frame. " speex_bits_reset(&bits); speex_encode(enc_state, input_frame, &bits); nbBytes = speex_bits_write(&bits, byte_ptr, MAX_NB_BYTES); " What happens if this is not done? I think I'm missing the point of having a SpeexBits object.

Speex 1.0.3 uses floats, but the unstable version 1.1.x uses short. Jean-Marc Le ven 16/04/2004 16:04, Kenji Chan a crit : > Im confused about the format of the PCM/WAV data for speex_encode & > speex_decode > > speex_encode(enc_state, input_frame, &bits); > > In the manual, it says input_frame is a (float *) pointing to the > beginning of a speech

Hi, i'm following encoder example in the manual.pdf of speex documentation. Here's my portion of code: int SPEEX_EncodePCM(struct _IDA_ClientSocket *IDA,char *buffer,unsigned char *PCM,int num_samples) { int ret,c,d=0,nbBytes,ttBytes=0; float PCM_F[160]; char cBits[200]; #ifndef DISABLESPEEX speex_bits_reset(&IDA->speex_bits); for(c=0;c<num_samples;c++) {