similar to: please test rc2 support in sweep :)

Hi Conrad, Thanks a lot for the info. This is exactly what I needed. We want to use speex in our IP telephony client and I was indeed trying to put together a GUI configuration screen. Best regards, Chris > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 06:04:39PM +0200, Chris Flerackers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there are document where the interaction between all the configuration >> options

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:19:17PM -0500, me@sbooth.org wrote: > Hi all, > > I have recently added Speex support to my app (http://sbooth.org/Max/) and > am in the process of creating a GUI for the user to control the codec > parametere. I am new to Speex and as such I am not really sure which > parameters are more important than others, and deserve prominent > placement,

Hi guys I have tried compiling this attached code, I made all the buffers 320, there is no trace of a 160 buffer, but I get a " SpeexEncoder requires 320 samples to process a Frame, not 160" error. Maybe there's something I'm missing, here's my code: import java.io.IOException; import java.io.FileOutputStream; import java.io.File; import

Hi, I am looking how to setup speex codec in codecs.conf for 8 Kbps and 6 Kbps. In config file are many parameters for setting. I don't know what is need to change for narrowbad like 8 Kbps and 6 kbps. Any suggestion? [speex] ;0-10 quality => 4 ;0-10 complexity => 4 ; true / false enhancement => true ; true / false vad => false ; true / false vbr => false ; 0 = off, otherwise,

Great, thanks! That patch solved it. VBR without DTX seems to work perfectly now. If I enable DTX, there's still a little bit of buzz but it doesn't seem to last very long when it happens. I appreciate the quick fix! Tom Jean-Marc Valin (jean-marc.valin@hermes.usherb.ca) wrote: > > Yep, you found a bug and here's the patch. It should solve your problem > (using VBR

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> gcc version 3.4.5 (mingw special) > > Can you try 4.0 or 4.1 just to be sure? mingw (native gcc for win32) doesn't officially support using gcc 4.0 and 4.1 yet (apparantly there have been some issues), so there are no binary packages. But if you think it helps, I can compile gcc 4.1 and give it a shot. >> Compile flags: >> DEFINES +=

Hi Marc, Thanks for your quick response. So if VAD is enabled then VBR will be enable although it's a special VBR. How about take out the VAD code from the VBR and remove the code else? Lianghu On 10/24/06, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > > 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. > > Will VAD still work If I

Hello, I'm try to run speex on some ARM processor. I'd like to cut away some speex features including VBR, ABR and preprocessor while still supporting VAD/DTX. But I've found some puzzles in the source code regarding VAD as below, 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. Will VAD still work If I don't use the source file preprocess.c? 2)The speex manual

> So far, I've noticed that --dtx alone doesn't seem to do anything, but --vad does > and the combination --dtx with --vad does more. The lone exception is for wide > and ultra-wide coding at quality 0, --vad, alone, makes the file slightly larger. > At all other sized the ordering is always: plain==--dtx, then --vad, then --vad > with --dtx. All you say look normal to me.

I'm running a: for band in n w u do for quality in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 do for complexity in 3 do for vad in "" "--vad" do for dtx in "" "--dtx" do echo speexenc -${band} --quality ${quality} --comp ${complexity} ${vad} ${dtx} input.${band}.wav

> All you say look normal to me. Okay, clarification requires less code to be written than a bug. :) > > Does that makes sense? I would have thought that --dtx alone would have = > doen it, > > but maybe it needs perfect digital silence to work? Or only uses the voi= > ce activation > > to know when there's silence? > > DTX requires the VAD to know when

Jean-Marc Valin (jean-marc.valin@hermes.usherb.ca) wrote: > > > I've been using Speex in my voice-over-IP program on Win32, in > > wideband (16kHz) mode. I just starting using VBR recently and > > have run into something that might be a problem within Speex: > > Are you turning on DTX in addition to VBR? Also, what version are you > using. As of 1.0, DTX is

Hi, I would like to use sweep to "sweep out" proportions and confidence intervals for an array, however when I supply a function which returns a string (containing something like "9% (3-18%)") I get back a list instead of an array, here is a simplified example: # example showing that sweep does not return an array with same dimensions as STATS as advertised

Hi, I'm having a bit of trouble with the ABR. I'm a developer of Mumble, a voicechat application for gamers, and up to now we've just used VBR quality to determine the bitrate. In an effort to make the resource requirements a little more determinable (and limitable) for hosting, I tried switching to ABR, as there doesn't seem to be a way to determine the absolute peak

rc<-list(c( 123,321,234,543,654,768,986,987,246,284),c("Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec")) # the matrix has rownames that are used as identifiers and columns # of time. 1 years worth of data. Thats the native format

A friend of mine just got bitten by the fact that sweep() will happily sweep out a STATS vector of an arbitrary length -- even one whose length is not a divisor of any of the margins -- without complaining. I know the answer to this could be "well just don't do that", but it's easy to make a mistake in which margin you're sweeping ... What would R-core think of the

Hi Jean-Marc and others, I put Speex support in Sweep (a sound editor) yesterday, and had some fun with it :) I'd like to get some feedback before releasing it publically. I'm not really used to speech codecs (I work more with music) but I've been quite impressed at the file size and quality (especially when you hear what I did with some of the sample files ;) I didn't have any

hi there, I am new to mailing list so excuse me if I don't obey to the 'netiquette'. i am writing voice chat and speex is in the root of it. i write it in Java and use JNI to link with 'C'-based Speex 1.2beta. [I know of JSpeex but there are not implemented some features] recently i decided to use DTX feature of speex as well. the code follows. The problem is that no matter

I''ve got a Rails project that has been on the shelf for a few months, and I''m picking it back up. I''ve frozen Rails at 1.1.4 in vendor/, and did the "rails ." and "rake rails:update" to get it up to a current Rails level. The code initially seems to be working fine, but when I go to my login method, I get a 500 error thrown. Looking in the

Dear list, I have a matrix, spc, that should row-wise be interpolated: E.g. spc <- matrix (1:1e6, ncol = 250, nrow = 4000, byrow = TRUE) spc [1:10, 1:10] shifts <- seq_len (nrow (spc)) wl <- seq_len (ncol (spc)) interpolate <- function (spc.row, shift, wl) spline (wl + shift, spc.row, xout = wl, method = "natural")$y interpolate (spc [1,], shift = shifts [1], wl = wl)