similar to: Beta 4 is out!

Hi Marc, Thanks for your quick response. So if VAD is enabled then VBR will be enable although it's a special VBR. How about take out the VAD code from the VBR and remove the code else? Lianghu On 10/24/06, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > > 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. > > Will VAD still work If I

Hello, I'm try to run speex on some ARM processor. I'd like to cut away some speex features including VBR, ABR and preprocessor while still supporting VAD/DTX. But I've found some puzzles in the source code regarding VAD as below, 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. Will VAD still work If I don't use the source file preprocess.c? 2)The speex manual

Hi, I'm updating speex support in sweep to RC2 and I'd like some advice on encoder options, and would appreciate some testing of the user interface. a screenshot of the updated speex encoding dialog: http://www.vergenet.net/~conrad/tmp/sw_speexRC2_1.png you can grab a tarball of sweep for testing here: http://www.vergenet.net/~conrad/tmp/sweep-0.8.0-speexRC2.tar.gz general

Hi Conrad, Thanks a lot for the info. This is exactly what I needed. We want to use speex in our IP telephony client and I was indeed trying to put together a GUI configuration screen. Best regards, Chris > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 06:04:39PM +0200, Chris Flerackers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there are document where the interaction between all the configuration >> options

> So far, I've noticed that --dtx alone doesn't seem to do anything, but --vad does > and the combination --dtx with --vad does more. The lone exception is for wide > and ultra-wide coding at quality 0, --vad, alone, makes the file slightly larger. > At all other sized the ordering is always: plain==--dtx, then --vad, then --vad > with --dtx. All you say look normal to me.

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:19:17PM -0500, me@sbooth.org wrote: > Hi all, > > I have recently added Speex support to my app (http://sbooth.org/Max/) and > am in the process of creating a GUI for the user to control the codec > parametere. I am new to Speex and as such I am not really sure which > parameters are more important than others, and deserve prominent > placement,

Hi Everyone, I am still unable to start Asterisk 1.4 that I installed using ATrpms. I was initially suspecting some permissions issues but it seems to me that its more to do with a speex codec not loading properly. Here is the message I get if I run asterisk -cvvvvvvvvvvvvvv app_userevent.so => (Custom User Event Application) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/codecs.conf': Found --

I'm running a: for band in n w u do for quality in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 do for complexity in 3 do for vad in "" "--vad" do for dtx in "" "--dtx" do echo speexenc -${band} --quality ${quality} --comp ${complexity} ${vad} ${dtx} input.${band}.wav

I'm trying to use the SPEEX codec with Voicepulse. Here's what I see in the CLI when I RELOAD: -- Reloading module 'codec_speex.so' (Speex/PCM16 (signed linear) Codec Translator) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/codecs.conf': Found -- CODEC SPEEX: Setting Quality to 5 -- CODEC SPEEX: Setting Complexity to 5 -- CODEC SPEEX: Perceptual Enhancement Mode.

Jean-Marc, I was wondering if you could add a check to ensure that memory is actually allocated during the nb_encoder_init and sb_encoder_init functions. We have been looking at using Speex on a DSP and noticed that if we didn't allocate a large enough heap space memory segment that the DSP would crash. I would recommend something like: if (!st->stack) fprintf(stderr,"ERROR

I don't know why you're getting sound carrying over to the next time you encode - that doesn't sound normal to me. Have you tried saving and examining the raw audio you're feeding to the encoder? Have you tried encoding and decoding that using speexenc/speexdec? I use Speex in VBR mode for a VoIP app. I'm always recording and running the audio through the preprocessor

> All you say look normal to me. Okay, clarification requires less code to be written than a bug. :) > > Does that makes sense? I would have thought that --dtx alone would have = > doen it, > > but maybe it needs perfect digital silence to work? Or only uses the voi= > ce activation > > to know when there's silence? > > DTX requires the VAD to know when

Hi, Speex is getting close to beta4, which I'd like to be feature-complete (or as close as possible). That's why I'd like to ask if anyone here has needs for a feature that hasn't been implemented yet. If so, please let me know. For those interested, here's what's going to be in beta4. First, the VBR code has been greatly improved and now works good with wideband too.

Hello. I am working on implementing RFC 5574 (RTP Payload Format for the Speex Codec) in the ffmpeg and have a question concerning it. It would be nice if somebody could answered it. * Chapter 4.1.1 Registration of Media Type Audio/Speex, subpart "Optional parameters" states these SDP optional parameters: vbr: variable bit-rate - either 'on', 'off', or 'vad'

Hello, in my project im using speex 1.2rc1 and the preprocessor VAD seems to only separate complete silence from not complete silence frames. The Speex Manual, you can read "The voice activity detector (VAD) provided by the preprocessor is more advanced than the one directly provided in the codec." but if you go to the source code in preprocess.c line 995 "/* FIXME: This VAD

Jesus, Unfortunately, FFT and magic algorithms don't work (yet?). You might want to try this if you're not satisfied with Speex VAD: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2008-August/006860.html It won't perform any miracles, but I think it works pretty well and is easy to tweak. Tom >---- Original Message ---- >From: jmorion at toomeeting.com >To: speex-dev at

Jean-Marc Valin (jean-marc.valin@hermes.usherb.ca) wrote: > > > I've been using Speex in my voice-over-IP program on Win32, in > > wideband (16kHz) mode. I just starting using VBR recently and > > have run into something that might be a problem within Speex: > > Are you turning on DTX in addition to VBR? Also, what version are you > using. As of 1.0, DTX is

Jean-Marc and others, We are using Speex inside our Video Conferencing application and have some questions about the trade-off of complexity vs bitrate. A little background information is needed: 1. For us the actual bit-rate isn't that big a deal. Speex running at 14kbps or 8 kbps is minor compared to the video traffic running at 128, 256 or 384 kbps. 2. We care a little about

All: Attached please find yet another RTP profile revision (v5). You can also find the document at: http://www.herlein.com/downloads/speex/docs/ Changes: - added vbr, cng, ebw, sr optional parameters to MIME - added vbr, cng, ebw a=fmtp options for SDP use - added required document attributes for submission to IETF and IANA (format and author contact information). Note that we

Hi guys I have tried compiling this attached code, I made all the buffers 320, there is no trace of a 160 buffer, but I get a " SpeexEncoder requires 320 samples to process a Frame, not 160" error. Maybe there's something I'm missing, here's my code: import java.io.IOException; import java.io.FileOutputStream; import java.io.File; import