similar to: speexenc/dec exit code

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "speexenc/dec exit code"

2004 Aug 06
4
Chopping off the wideband?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:06:16PM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > BTW, when you have something working and stable, I could include it in > the main Speex distribution. Hmmm, define working and stable :) <braindump topic="speexcat"> It began as a merge between speexdec and speexenc from 1.0beta3, with the encoding/decoding removed, and simply piped in and out from ogg
2011 May 04
2
speexenc/speexdec doubles file size
this is not really a development question, but i didn't find another mailing list to ask it. any idea why size of wav file doubles when it is encoded to speex and back to wav: $ ls -ls testi.wav 40 -rw-r--r-- 1 foo foo 40674 May 4 14:38 testi.wav $ speexenc --denoise --agc --quality 10 testi.wav testi.spx Encoding 8000 Hz audio using narrowband mode (mono) $ ls -ls testi.spx 20
2004 Aug 06
3
Chopping off the wideband?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:09:43PM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Le mar 18/02/2003 ? 17:38, John Hayes a ?crit : > > If I encode something in ultra-wideband, can I decode it in wideband by > > chopping off bytes in every frame? > > All you have to do is use the --force-wb switch with speexdec. It will > decode as if the file were wideband, ignoring the ultra-wideband
2004 Aug 06
2
patch for libspeex
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 06:04:08PM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Maybe not everything got re-compiled and some parts were left with -g or > something? With the files you sent, I get (on my PIII 1 GHz, with -O3): > speexenc --comp 3 --quality 3 sample.wav sample.spx > 0,65s user 0,00s system 100% cpu 0,647 total > > strange... I'm recompiling the lot, no debugging, -O3 (or
2004 Aug 06
3
Speex wishlist
Hello Bernard, Friday, December 13, 2002, 7:22:54 AM, you wrote: Bernard> I've one small request - an option on speexenc that allows you to Bernard> specify a speex file to append to, allowing you to concatenate Bernard> streams without losing quality by decoding & encoding. Ideally, it Bernard> would: But you can `cat speex1.ogg speex2.ogg> unionspeex.og` and still have
2004 Aug 06
2
patch for libspeex
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 01:46:19AM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Thanks for the patch. I applied it and it give me up to 15% in speed. > Doesn't seem to change the results, which is a good thing (though you > originally forgot a "used=0" in vq_nbest_sign). I'll check a thing or > two and I'll apply to CVS. D'oh. My carelessness, sorry! :) > Strange...
2008 Apr 01
2
speexdec 1.2.3
Dear Speex codec community: I am working on conversion of voice files. I could not figure out how to use speexdec.exe 1.2.3 in piped mode in order to avoid the creation of the potentially large intermediate *.wav or *.pcm files. Any pointer to web or file of instruction is appreciated. Attempt (one long command line, failed): type d:\test.spx | "d:\speex 1.2.3\bin\speexdec.exe" - -
2004 Aug 06
0
Speex wishlist
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:57:00AM -0300, Alejandro G. Belluscio wrote: > But you can `cat speex1.ogg speex2.ogg> unionspeex.og` and still have > a valid gapless file. Correct me if I'm wrong. I tried this with speex files, but speexdec insisted on ending at the end of the first file. I traced this back to the "end of stream" flag on the last packet in the file which has to
2006 Oct 03
3
How to get podcasters to adopt Speex?
Please consider using 16-bit 16kHz (wideband) instead. It's a huge increase in audio quality and the bitrate is still very low, especially if you take advantage of Speex features such as VBR. 8kHz seems totally inappropriate to me for desktop streaming audio, let alone 8-bit samples. Or perhaps your recording equipment is an original Sound Blaster from 1989? (Even that could record at
2011 May 04
0
speexenc/speexdec doubles file size
Juha Heinanen writes: > any idea why size of wav file doubles when it is encoded to speex and > back to wav: > > $ ls -ls testi.wav > 40 -rw-r--r-- 1 foo foo 40674 May 4 14:38 testi.wav > > $ speexenc --denoise --agc --quality 10 testi.wav testi.spx > Encoding 8000 Hz audio using narrowband mode (mono) > > $ ls -ls testi.spx > 20 -rw-r--r-- 1 foo foo 16405
2006 Oct 03
2
How to get podcasters to adopt Speex?
This is a really good point, and definitely a recurring theme on this mailing list. :) I wonder, what are some better options for handling this issue, other than to keep saying "just use 8/16/32kHz"? - Extend Speex to support other sample rates (seems unlikely..?) - Integrate a resampling algorithm into libspeex - Maintain a list of recommended resampling libraries that work well
2006 Aug 31
1
serving speex without a server
On my personal web pages hosted by my ISP I have a collection of speex files with names ending, as usual, in '.spx'. My ISP does not provide for scripting or CGI but thanks to the "Home-Brew Streaming" idea of Dr Tak Auyeng, www.drtak.org/teaches/ARC/speex/, my friends with Windows XP can listen to such a recording without the need for a prior download of the whole file and
2007 Jan 13
1
Batch Processing for SpeexEnc and SpeexDec
Hello, I am a master's student using Speex for my thesis research. My question is this: I am running speex from a command line in Unix and I want to encode/decode numerous files at once. How can this be done since the speexenc requires [options] input_filename.wav output_filename.spx and the reverse extensions for the decoder. Sorry I am much more of a hardware (read: EE) then a CS guy. I
2005 Sep 27
2
Speex ver 1.1.10 decoder problem
OK, that was a stupid error in the le_int prototype. It's fixed in svn now. Jean-Marc Le mercredi 28 septembre 2005 ? 11:53 +1000, Jean-Marc Valin a ?crit : > OK, it seems like I screwed up the wav header code between 1.1.8 and > 1.1.9. Everything seems fine (playing to soundcard also works), except > that the length reported for the wav is too short, which is why it stops >
2004 Sep 14
2
white noise problem when using -DFIXED_POINT
Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > On mar, 2004-09-14 at 16:31 -0700, wrote: > >>Hi there. We're trying to build a speex decoder for Palm OS (i.e. ARM7). >> >>No major problems porting thus far, but when compiling the speex modules with -DFIXED_POINT all the silent parts of the output are replaced with what sounds like high-power white noise. The spoken parts sound great, but
2005 Oct 12
2
help using libspeex in win32
Hi all, i'm going to try to create an app using libspeex (Speex 1.1.10) and Visual Studio and just have a few questions. First, what's the difference between libspeex and libspeex_dynamic? Do I need to include both projects in my new workspace? Next, how do I enable fixed_point using libspeex? Am I correct in assuming that an ARM processor would be able to record speech as speex files
2006 Apr 20
3
Recommended version for production use
Hi -- I'm looking at adding Speex decoder and encoder support to the Miles Sound System, a commercial library used by game developers on various platforms including PCs, the Mac, and game consoles. As part of my initial evaluation, I've gone ahead and downloaded the 1.0.4 and 1.1.1 Win32 binary distributions and played around encoding and decoding various files with the speexenc.exe and
2008 Apr 04
2
speexdec 1.2.3
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > Jahn, Ray (R.) a ?crit : > > > Dear Speex codec community: > > > > I am working on conversion of voice files. I could not figure out how to use speexdec.exe 1.2.3 in piped mode in order to avoid the creation of the potentially large intermediate *.wav or *.pcm files. Any
2004 Dec 14
4
"Click" at end of SPX files?
Hi, I am experiencing some unfortunate problems when encoding WAV files to spx using version 1.0.4. A "click" which is not present in the original WAV file is added to the end of the spx file. Is this a known problem, and if so, which version of the encoder should I switch to... and if I have to switch the encoder, will I also have to switch the version of the decoder? Sincerely,
2005 Sep 27
4
Speex ver 1.1.10 decoder problem
Hi, I just started using speex recently and I've been having problem with Speex ver. 1.1.10 decoder. I used Speex to encode a wav file to spx then decode it back to wav file to see the voice quality that results from different speex options. Somehow, I couldn't get the original wav file back. I used both Speex ver 1.1.6 and ver 1.1.10 to both encode and decode, despite the same output