similar to: Bug when using rsync -r --delete -b --backup-dir

Hello, I am using rsync v2.5.6 to backup our entire server filesystem over the network to a central backup server. I have copied the example script from the rsync website (http://rsync.samba.org/examples.html) to create incremental backups, the --backup-dir seems to have a strange side-effect. Everything goes well, but on the server side where the backup is stored I can't seem to break out

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5091 Summary: Incremental-recursive, list-only "rsync --delete" tries to clean out working dir Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20030728/49616c2f/attachment.bin

I've read a few tutorials about how to use rsync via ssh using the command= functionality to restrict where the user can sync to. I've got this on the on the destination side in it's ~/.ssh/authorized_keys... command="rsync --server -vvnlogDtpre.iLsf --timeout=999 . bkp",no-port-forwarding,no-X11-forwarding,no-agent-forwarding ssh-rsa AAetc I've tried variations of the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758 Summary: "File exists" error using options -b and --backup-dir with device files. Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

With --backup in order to end up with 2 files it has to write out a whole new file. Sure, it only sent the differences (normally that means over the network but there is no network here) but the writing end was told to duplicate the file being updated before updating it. On 2/13/19 10:47 AM, Delian Krustev via rsync wrote: > Hi All, > > For a backup purpose I'm trying to transfer

On 2019-02-13 10:47 a.m., Delian Krustev via rsync wrote: > > > Free space at the beginning and end of the backup: > Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/bkp 102392 76872 20400 80% /mnt/bkp > /dev/mapper/bkp 102392 78768 18504 81% /mnt/bkp > > ####################################################

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 Summary: rsync 3.1.1 incorrectly creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir on Mac OSX Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hi All, For a backup purpose I'm trying to transfer only the changed blocks of large files. Thus I've run "rsync" with the appropriate options: RSYNC_BKPDIR=`mktemp -d` rsync \ --archive \ --no-whole-file \ --inplace \ --backup \ --backup-dir="$RSYNC_BKPDIR" \ --verbose \ --stats \ /var/backups/mysql-dbs/. \ /mnt/bkp/var/backups/mysql-dbs/. The

Hi all, I'm running rsync (2.6.2) this way (which do not remove files from the destination side which were removed from the sending side): rsync -vbu --backup-dir=/bkp --stats /dir1/*.fle /dir2 I want to sync all .fle files from dir1 to the dir2 and also remove files from the destination which were removed from the sending side, using no recursion. Already tried this:

I have found an unwanted feature of rsync 2.5.5. It has to do with soft links and the --delete option in archive mode. The following shows how to reproduce the error. Provide a soft link that refers to a parent directory. %> /bin/ls -lR /tmp/src /tmp/src: total 16 16 drwxrwxr-x 2 wke sys_admin 239 Sep 17 16:18 dir1/ /tmp/src/dir1: total 32 16 lrwxrwxrwx 1 wke

Normally I would use the --link-dest option to do this but I can't since I'm rsyncing from a Mac to a Samba share on a Linux box and hard links don't work. What I want to do is create a 10 day rotating incremental backup. I used the first script example on the rsync examples page as a template. The only thing I changed was the destination to be a local directory and paths for

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-06-07 10:49 ------- Yes, this particular problem started in 2.6.4 because

I'm trying to back-up a set of windows machines onto a single Linux machine, so that I can easily make a tape from there. The Linux Machine (RedHat 7.3, running samba 2.2.6), is set to use mount.smbfs to log in to each machine's Administrative share, and copy several files from the hard drive. One machine is giving me a great deal of difficulty, however. Our last remaining window's

Colin, I know that on Windows, when you copy and Immensely large single file, there are times when it will show something like 100 years in minutes to complete the copy. Your issue could be related to that issue with Windows. You say that you copy files over from several other systems without a problem. Are those files on the other systems single small files or are they also in

I had originally written about this problem last month (http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/2002-November/085418.html) Since then, our company has added another Windows Fileserver which I'm trying to back up, and they are both having the problem. Because it happens on both servers, this leads me to believe it really is a problem with my Samba server. I've upgraded to 2.2.7a, as the

Hello, I've been testing out using rsync for nightly incremental backups through the '--backup' & '--backup-dir' options. So far, I've noticed two issues. 1) First, if an empty directory is removed from the source, rsync will remove it from the destination but not create the directory in the backup-dir location. $ mkdir -p /tmp/src/foo $ rsync -a /tmp/src/

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:39:39PM +1000, Mark Inkley wrote: > You will note, that I am using 2.6.6, previously I used 2.6.2 which > had the same issues. Is the version on each machine 2.6.6? If the remote version is older than 2.6.4 then rsync cannot use its keep-alive protocol to try to keep the connection from timing out during lulls in the sending of data (such as when one side is busy

Hai Stefan, Yes, its always better to ask the list, that way everybody can learn from it. ;-) > Do you think I will have to rejoin it to the domain? No i dont think so. Please note, o dont know anything about gentoo except that they have a good wiki/info pages. If this was debian, then in this case, what i would extra do here, run : samba -b and backup all folders of samba and any thing

Hi all, I'm running a small (50 users) AD with an AD-DC and a Domain Member as the file server. Both running debian Stretch and self-compiled samba 4.6.12. Bind as DNS. Multiple shares configured using windows ACLs. All work as expected except for User Home Folders (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders). I've created a folder for each user under samba_homes/ and gave full