similar to: Meaning of "failed verification -- update retained (will try again)."

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Meaning of "failed verification -- update retained (will try again).""

2020 Aug 11
0
Meaning of "failed verification -- update retained (will try again)."
Mostly it means that the file rsync ended up with on the target end didn't match the file on the source it started with. This is mostly caused by the file being modified on the source while rsync is copying it but it can also be a memory corruption problem. On 8/11/20 1:13 PM, Peng Yu via rsync wrote: > Hi, > > I see some warnings like the following. Could anybody explains what
2016 Apr 21
5
[Bug 11866] New: rsync fails (failed to re-stat) when using double fuzzy + link-dest on renamed files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11866 Bug ID: 11866 Summary: rsync fails (failed to re-stat) when using double fuzzy + link-dest on renamed files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:
2018 Nov 07
4
Avoiding constant HDD access
Am 07.11.18 um 12:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:44:28 +0100 > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:45:45 +0300 >>> Albert Berger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>>
2018 Nov 07
2
Avoiding constant HDD access
Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:45:45 +0300 > Albert Berger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I'm running a Samba server on Raspbian and observing that Samba >> during idle periods is constantly (every minute) writing to HDD >> (maybe doing some journaling?) what causes the HDD to constantly spin
2019 Nov 03
4
Recent inability to view long filenames stored with scp via samba mount
Greetings Samba team, It has been a long time since I needed to ask a Samba technical question. Server and workstation are both running the latest Samba packages via Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I recently applied the security updates... actually that was yesterday I applied them. > samba (2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.23) xenial-security; urgency=medium > > * SECURITY UPDATE: client code can
2015 Jul 02
8
[Bug 11378] New: Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Bug ID: 11378 Summary: Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc. Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW
2018 Nov 07
3
Avoiding constant HDD access
I'm running a Samba server on Raspbian and observing that Samba during idle periods is constantly (every minute) writing to HDD (maybe doing some journaling?) what causes the HDD to constantly spin and never standby: root at rpi:~# pidstat -dl 20 Linux 4.4.50-v7+ (localhost) 11/07/2018 _armv7l_ (4 CPU) 04:10:08 AM UID PID kB_rd/s kB_wr/s kB_ccwr/s iodelay Command 04:10:28 AM
2015 Apr 14
1
The --inplace is very different from the behaviour of --partial when resuming a complex case transfer.
Hi all, >From the manpage of rsync, I can see the following descriptions: --inplace The option implies --partial (since an interrupted transfer does not delete the file) So I do the following testings on the `--inplace' and `--partial' for resuming a file with the following steps: 1- rsync ftp.cn.debian.org::debian/dists/wheezy/main/binary-amd64/
2016 Jan 21
4
Why is my rsync transfer slow?
I run a rsync job transferring about 45 million files/approximately 1.8 TB data (a Mac OS X Time Machine backup) over a 100 MBit connection. I use rsync 3.1.1 from MacPorts (I first tried the built in rsync, version 2.6.9, since it has a Mac OS X specific cache parameter, but it ran out of memory) with the following parameters % rsync -HzvhErlptgoDW --stats --progress --out-format="%t %f
2016 May 04
2
[Bug 11893] New: rsync should check local file access permission before connecting to remote end
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11893 Bug ID: 11893 Summary: rsync should check local file access permission before connecting to remote end Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core
2017 May 05
10
[Bug 12769] New: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) depending on source file system
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769 Bug ID: 12769 Summary: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) depending on source file system Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core
2012 Jul 18
1
allow-notify SUBNET and request-xfr inconsistency
Hi list, We are observing strange behavior of nsd v3.2.9 acting as slave DNS server. The environment is set up as follows: 0. We are using 172.16.0.0/16 subnet; 1. Primary Master server at 172.16.100.114; 2. Slave server at 172.16.100.115. The config file is in /etc/nsd-dns-slave.conf; 3. There may be also other Master servers im the given subnet. Now I want to permit DNS NOTIFY messages to
2013 Sep 27
6
[Bug 10170] New: rsync should support reflink similar to cp --reflink
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10170 Summary: rsync should support reflink similar to cp --reflink Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at shubin.ca
2012 Jul 23
1
[PATCH] nsd-patch: fix segfault after renaming slave zone
Hi all, we have discovered a segfault in nsd-patch when renaming slave zone in nsd config file if some data for this zone still exists in the IXFR diff database. In my case, the zone "black" was renamed to "blackinwhite": > root at ggd115:/cage/nsd/var/nsd/zones#nsd-patch -c > /cage/nsd/etc/nsd-dns-slave.conf > reading database > reading updates to database >
2013 Dec 13
17
[Bug 10322] New: Slow Performance over Network rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 Summary: Slow Performance over Network rsync Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: Joerg.Grube at Gmx.De
2007 Jul 10
1
nsdc update implementation details
Hi, I have a query regarding running a manual update of nsd via: # nsdc update My NSD server is accepting notifications from two servers. From my nsd.conf: # master 1 allow-notify: X.X.X.X NOKEY request-xfr: AXFR X.X.X.X NOKEY # master 2 allow-notify: Y.Y.Y.Y NOKEY request-xfr: AXFR Y.Y.Y.Y NOKEY Are both servers sequentially queried each time
2018 Dec 30
2
--partial does not "unhide" the files
Hi, I used --partial to transfer files from my local computer (rsync 3.1.2, Debian) to a remote computer (rsync 3.1.1 WD MyPassport Storage device) The files get transferred, but after successful transfer, the files are not renamed from .<tmpfile> to <file>. Where to go next? Here is the verbose output after transferring an empty file heiko at blade:~/Pictures$ rsync
2014 Jun 27
3
[Bug 10677] New: external zlib broken after update to 3.1.1 on FreeBSD
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10677 Summary: external zlib broken after update to 3.1.1 on FreeBSD Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ehaupt at
2007 Oct 02
1
0/0 is not valid, though the man page says it is
Hi, The man page for nsd.conf claims the following syntax is valid: provide-xfr: 0/0 NOKEY However, this gives the error: /var/dnsx/nsd.zones:9: error: Bad ip4 address '0' The following does work: provide-xfr: 0.0.0.0/0 NOKEY So either the code is wrong, or the man page :) Paul
2015 Jul 04
0
[Bug 11378] Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Nathan Neulinger <nneul at neulinger.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #2 from Nathan Neulinger <nneul