similar to: question about batches

Hi, I'm trying to understand the behaviour of rsync when used with the --write-batch or --only-write-batch options. I did some tests where I had two fairly big file trees, think a rootfs, where their only difference was an extra file containing only one character. I noticed the batch file was ~100kB and after inspecting it with hexdump it looks like it contains the whole list of files

Thanks for info. I was under the assumption that rsync will execute followings steps: 1. Compare first to identify different files (new/updated) --> This is where i am worried due to data size 2. Upload new/updated files 3 Remove source file As per your comment, rsync will compare after uploading to check if files are identical ? Additionally i don't expect to delete directories as i want

Given the structure… /foo/bar/want-this.txt /foo/bar/want-this-2.txt /bar/foo/ /do-not-want-to-transfer/test.txt With the desire to ‘include items with foo in their path’... I understand that the closest I can get to a satisfactory filter ruleset is something like: + **foo** + */ - * … and setting --prune-empty-dirs. However, /bar/foo/ is empty, and of course should be copied.. but is pruned.

Hi, I have huge data on my destination system (>5 TB, > 400,000 files, nested folderss) and i am trying to publish new files from our shared location to destination system. I am looking forward to use rsync but want it to just push new/updated files uploaded on shared server to destination. I don't intent to keep all data to remain in sync on source server and want to delete the source

Thanks for your inputs. Surprisingly i tried executing the following command but end up deleting ssh.exe in Cygwin folder when source folder path is incorrect or not reachable. rsync --remove-source-files -v -av -r /cygdrive/c/AmitTest/ ssh username at destinationserver:/cygdrive/e/AMIT/AmitTest/ I am wondering if remove source is doing some tricks there but unable to find root cause why ssh.exe

Hello, I have a data set that's too large to load into memory all at once to do a simple linear regression on. What would be a good way to do a piecewise (batch) regression on it in R? I've started reading the docs and FAQs and haven't found anything yet that would suggest how to do this, aside from diving into the guts of lm(). Thanks and regards--! David Joerg dsjoerg@yahoo.com

On 03/02/18 13:20, Dave Gordon via rsync wrote: > When using fake-super mode in an rsync receiver, anything that's neither a > file nor a directory (e.g. devices, symlinks, etc) is converted into a file, > and properties such as original ownership, filetype, and permissions are > stored in a specific extended attribute. > > In the case of a symlink, the contents of the link

If the source only has 50 files then rsync only needs to check for those 50 files on the target. If one exists rsync will compare the timestamp to see if it needs copying. Yes, rsync verifies a hash of the file after transfer. On 11/19/2017 02:41 PM, Amit via rsync wrote: > Thanks for info. I was under the assumption that rsync will execute > followings steps: > 1. Compare first to

If you remove the source files as rsync copies them (--remove-source-files) then rsync will have nothing to compare. It will just go through the tree looking for files that aren't on the target which would probably be any file it finds. Just don't ever use --delete in that scenario. Adding --omit-dir-times will save you a lot of output if you have any of --itemize-changes --verbose

When using fake-super mode in an rsync receiver, anything that's neither a file nor a directory (e.g. devices, symlinks, etc) is converted into a file, and properties such as original ownership, filetype, and permissions are stored in a specific extended attribute. In the case of a symlink, the contents of the link are stored in a plain file. The original mode of the symlink is normally

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10925 Bug ID: 10925 Summary: non-atomic xattr replacement in btrfs => rsync --read-batch random errors Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: All URL: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs /40013 OS: All

Marcello Maggioni <marcello at codeplay.com> writes: > I'm getting a very strange behaviour while adding already created > instructions in batches into basicblocks instead of creating and > inserting them immediately. > > Because I need to insert instructions in a certain specific order > inside multiple different BBs I found it easy to use the IRBuilder to > create

> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Marcello Maggioni > Subject: [LLVMdev] Is it safe to insert instructions in batches into BBs? > Because I need to insert instructions in a certain specific order inside > multiple different BBs I found it easy to use the IRBuilder to create > instructions without inserting them into a

Trying to do something like this, in Ubuntu 11.10/12.04: Location A (work occurs changing files) rsync --write-batch /media/bkup/foo.rsb /path/to/files/ /path/to/copy/ Location B rsync --read-batch /media/bkup/foo.rsb /path/to/files/ rsync --read-batch /media/bkup/foo.rsb /path/to/copy/ (work occurs changing files) rsync --write-batch /media/bkup/foo.rsb /path/to/files/ /path/to/copy/

I needed a tool to produce diffs of binary volumes, and to apply them as patches accordingly. So I tried the 'batch mode' that was added to rsync, but it invariably segfaulted on reading the batches... $ sh foo.rsync_argvs foo.rsync_argvs: line 1: 8971 Segmentation fault rsync -a -v --stats --read-batch=foo ${1:-FOO} rsync: error writing 64 unbuffered bytes - exiting: Broken pipe

Il giorno dom 4 nov 2018 alle ore 01:45 Ben Lindstrom <mouring at offwriting.org> ha scritto: > > I don't see it as a bug. Yes, this is why I put a question mark in the subject. > As if I'm writing a batch script I want to see the echo of the command and the output so if there is a failure I know where the failure is. I see: you have a single batch file with no

Hi, I'm getting a very strange behaviour while adding already created instructions in batches into basicblocks instead of creating and inserting them immediately. Because I need to insert instructions in a certain specific order inside multiple different BBs I found it easy to use the IRBuilder to create instructions without inserting them into a BB, storing them somewhere (vector, map

Hello. This is my first post here ;) I've been using rsync heavily for quite some time. For one, we use it to perform offline backups of numerous machines into single location. Since the systems are basically identical, it's wise to keep only different files, hard-linking identical ones. That worked well for many years, till rsync-3 were out. The procedure is like this: on the

I have repeatable cases where a (very large) file contents are the intended content of a device (partition) of that exact size. The target device is already mostly of that content, but a few block have been changed. I want to restore the device contents back to what the file originally was. I'm trying to find a way to have rsync's write end open the device as a file and do its thing to

Hi everybody, I have been using rsync for quite some time, and I've realized it is a fantastic tool. As it is able to syncronize two CD images, I was wondering, if I could do that with a harddisk partition. Would it be possible to syncronize two partitions at device level somehow? I mean using: # rsync /dev/hda8 /dev/hda9 skipping non-regular file "hda8" where /dev/hda8