similar to: Updating of access times

Thank you so much. Regards, Dat Le ________________________________ From: Karl O. Pinc <kop at karlpinc.com> Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2020 5:33 PM To: Rainy Days via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> Cc: Rainy Days <tandatle1994 at hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Encrypt destination file On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 15:49:43 +0000 Rainy Days via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote:

Hi, I use rsync with hardlinks for backup, once a week doing checksums to ensure there's no filesystem corruption in the backed-up data. I also use tmpwatch, or something similar, to clean up /tmp, it removes files that have not been accessed recently. (atime older than some configured limit). I backup /tmp because I throw stuff in tmp that I might possibly need again but don't want to

Folks, bugs at stupidkitties.com wrote: " I was wondering if it'd be feasible to add an option (or multiple options, depending on the desired granularity) to cause rsync to treat changes in file attributes the same way it treats changes to the file's contents when it encounters hard links at the destination. Maybe something like --relink-p or something?" One of colleagues has

rsync watchers, I've been using rsync version 3.1.1+, and do like the improved --stats output: e.g. Number of files: 2480403 (reg: 2034290, dir: 233487, link: 212174, special: 452) Number of created files: 356 (reg: 6, dir: 3, link: 347) Number of regular files transferred: 16 ... - thanks to the developers. However, I want to be able to look at the --stats output and make a decision

I would agree. Plus he said this was something he did to help his wife. It is entirely possible that he runs a Samba server to assists a non-technical wife just like a corporate IT department would do. On 07/27/2016 02:26 PM, Tony Reed wrote: > I would rather the maintainers would spend their time improving the > application, and not worrying aobut the OP's hurt little open-sourced

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #24 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> --- On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000 samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 > > --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com --- > Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement > request myself, I found everything

I would rather the maintainers would spend their time improving the application, and not worrying aobut the OP's hurt little open-sourced religious feelings. I use rsync to transfer pretty massive (wait for it) ADOBE PHOTOSHOP files around my LAN. Neener neener fucken neener. On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:56:07

I appreciate the parable of helping non-technical users (or, more precisely, users not keen on IT). As I understand, placement of software like Word or Photoshop servers this purpose. But both of them have decent open-source counterparts, and they are better fit for an rsync manual. Or, if from any reason proprietary software is preferred in this context (perhaps because it generates even more

On 07/09/2013 09:27:58 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > Attached and on the "ipconfig_down" branch at github > (https://github.com/kpinc/klibc.git) you will find 4 patches > which let ipconfig bring down interfaces. Please consider > them for inclusion. > I've related patches to the Debian dropbear package which > support initramfs configuration/creation. I will email

samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 > > --- Comment #1 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> 2014-05-28 19:05:04 UTC --- > Yum is also rsync happy. That's where our --link-dest backups always break due > to too many hard links. ---------- What would be "too many"? -- a few million? I have files in a test setup that

Hi, Attached and on the "ipconfig_down" branch at github (https://github.com/kpinc/klibc.git) you will find 4 patches which let ipconfig bring down interfaces. Please consider them for inclusion. Why do this? It's useful when the rootfs is crypted and is unlocked by supplying passwords over the network. In this case the initramfs brings up a network interface. It can be useful

> On 15 Jun 2017, at 19:29, Karl O. Pinc via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:23:44 +0000 > just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync > <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12819 >> >> --- Comment #7 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> --- >

How do I get asterisk to do something when I pick up a phone? For instance, I've got a regular pots phone hooked up to a zaptel interface, and I want it to vocalize "hello" when I pick up the phone and then give me a dial tone, wait for digits, make a call, etc. I tried the 's' extension in extensions.conf and setting 'immediate' to "yes' in zapata.conf and

Hi, I'm using rsync with --link-dest to do backups. I don't have any sparse files, but someday I might. Should I be using --sparse? I notice that -S is not implied by -a. This makes me suspicious that --sparse is not (yet?) suitable for general purpose use. There also seem to be outstanding bugs related to --sparse. Thanks. Karl <kop at meme.com> Free Software: "You

On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:23:44 +0000 just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12819 > > --- Comment #7 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> --- > Note that my patch simply adds a sync() just after recv_files(), so > one sync() per connection, not per write operation. >

Hi, I thought I should document this. (Dovecot 2.2.9, see config at bottom.) I installed dovecot and then converted a number of mbox mailboxes to Maildir, and had a number of pre-existing Maildir mailboxes. I then installed the debian (wheezy) fts-solar and jetty packages, and tested my inbox using the "telnet localhost imap ... 3 SEARCH text "test" method as described on the

On 12/03/2014 01:37:58 PM, Kevin Korb wrote: > As far as a backup provider goes I wouldn't expect them to use rsync > over SSL unless that were built into rsync in the future (and has > been > around long enough that most users would have it). > > I would expect them to either use rsync over ssh secured by rrsync or > rsyncd over ssh with them managing the rsyncd.conf

The way gnutar "preserves" atime is by noting it before the read, and setting it back after the read, thus wiping out a legitimate setting of atime occuring during that interval. Yeah, the netapps mess with unix times. Did you notice that mtime and ctime always match? Now that I know you're on a netapp, though, your problems are solved. Snapshot and sync from the snapshot, then

On 02/05/17 13:48, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Dario Lesca via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> Il giorno mar, 25/04/2017 alle 09.25 -0300, Carlos A. P. Cunha via >> samba ha scritto: >>> Hello >>> My fileserver is a samba 4.5.4, in Ubuntu 14.04, is all ok. >>> My question is, >>>

On Tue, 26 May 2020 00:43:41 +0200 uxio prego via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 25 May 2020, at 23:55, Wayne Davison via rsync > > <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > I've decided to give hosting it on github a try, especially since > > there's been a lot of nice contributions lately. Hopefully this > > will make it