similar to: How Can I save the original permissions while setting g+rX for all files

When I try it the chmod works on both the real permissions and the permissions in the xatttr. Maybe the behavior has changed since whatever version you have (3.1.3 here) but this probably wouldn't help you either. On 12/8/19 7:56 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou via rsync wrote: > Hello list! > > Combining -M--fake-super with --chmod ends up changing the permissions > stored in the

Thanks. This is a bit counter-intuitive to me. So how would you tell rsync to store the original permissions in the xattr, but do not touch the real file mode? On Thursday, March 12, 2020 6:26:18 PM CET, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote: > I would expect that the sending rsync would only send the perms provided > modified by the --chmod. I wouldn't expect the receiver to even know > the

Thank you for the feedback, I'm glad to see that different people see the issue differently. As a followup question, what would you expect this to do: rsync --perms --chmod g+rX -M--fake-super src dst I would expect it to store the original permissions in the xattr, while modifying the real file mode according to the chmod. On Thursday, March 12, 2020 6:06:34 PM CET, Kevin Korb via rsync

rsync --perms -M--fake-super src dst For me, this command means that rsync should save the original perms in the xattr, and leave the real file mode to the umask default. Currently it also modifies the real file mode, and there is no way to store something different in the xattr. According to an old bug report that I found, more people would like --fake-super to be a complete attribute

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7112 Summary: --fake-super should use default permissions for real files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

On 2020-03-17 00:03:03 [+0100], Dimitrios Apostolou via rsync wrote: > On Thursday, February 20, 2020 10:34:53 PM CET, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > via rsync wrote: > > > > I'm still not sure if rsync requires a cryptographic hash _or_ if a > > strong hash like xxHash64 would be just fine for the job. > > I'm fairly sure the hash should *not* be easy to

I don't believe it is possible. I think the misunderstanding stems from the fact that the permissions are even stored in the xattr. They don't need to be there but they may as well be. They don't take much space. The real question would be when rsync reads the file to restore it and the file perms are different than the ones in the xattr which set does it use? On 3/16/20 10:01 AM,

On 2020-02-20 20:06:39 [+0100], Markus Ueberall wrote: > On 2020-02-09 23:19, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > [...] > > My primar motivation to use SHA1 for checksumming (by default) instead > > of MD5 is not the additional security bits but performance. On a decent > > x86 box the SHA1 performance is almost the same as MD5's but with > > acceleration it

I would expect that the sending rsync would only send the perms provided modified by the --chmod. I wouldn't expect the receiver to even know the other permissions. On 3/12/20 1:23 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou via rsync wrote: > Thank you for the feedback, I'm glad to see that different people see > the issue > differently. As a followup question, what would you expect this to do:

Permissions don't require super. Any place where permissions can't be stored certainly can't handle xattrs either. So, I wouldn't expect --fake-super to affect --perms at all. On 3/12/20 12:46 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou via rsync wrote: > rsync --perms -M--fake-super src dst > > For me, this command means that rsync should save the original perms in the > xattr, and

Hi all! I have a corpus of virtual users ( user1 at domain.tld , user2 at domain.tld, user3 at domain.tld,..., usern at domain.tld ... ) authenticated against Active Directory. Is it possible to group some users (virtual) and give appropriate ACLs on a shared imap public folder using an ACL vfile? thanks in advance Dimitrios

Hi All, I cannot get my Samba server 2.2.8 working with winbind correctly on Solaris 8. I intend to use this to transparently authenticate squid 2.5stable2. I compiled samba using gcc 2.95.3. configure options were ./configure --with-winbind-auth-challenge --with-winbind --with-pam root# ./wbinfo -t Secret is good root# ./wbinfo -u 0xc0000022 The same thing with wbinfo -g. getent group

Hi there Is there any way in dovecot to disable the storage of messages on server when they are read/downloaded by the users (POP3). The server keeps the e-mail when users tick the option on their MUA to keep (leave) messages on server. dovecot 1.0.7 POP3 / maildir Thanks in advance Dimitrios Karapiperis postmaster [at] thessaloniki [dot] gr

Hello, I have an annoying little issue. I am currently running Samba 2.2.5-10 as a Primary Domain Controller and have a number of shared drives with a variety of differing users and user rights all over the place. In my smb.conf file, I have the following share: [emergpo] path = /share/purchasing/emergpo force directory mode = 0770 create mode = 0770

Hi all, we are using samba 2.2.6 with windows xp SP1, and roaming profiles. We would like to have email settings (servers/usernames etc) with the roaming profiles, but outlook (either microsoft, or express) store their settings in a path that is not included in the profiles we do not care about the actual emails, since the mailserver is IMAP, we only care about settings Has anybody

Hi there is there any binary/script to repot user's quota upon request? Dimitrios Karapiperis

Hi there! I have two DNS records mail1.domain.tld mail2.domain.tld I have issued SSL server Certificates for both my domain names. Is it possible to tell dovecot to use both , depending on client access; clients using the mail1.domain.tld be served by the mail1.domain.tld .key and .cert and those using mail2.domain.tld be served by the mail2.domain.tld .key and .cert Thanks in advance

Dear all I am trying to create a package in R 1.9.0 and I a getting an error message which I do not understand. (I am using R in Windows XP and 2000) For example the following works well in 1.8.1 C:\Program Files\R\rw1081\src\gnuwin32>make pkg-gamlss ---------- Making package gamlss ------------ adding build stamp to DESCRIPTION installing inst files installing indices not zipping

I have a vector that has 1,974 elements and each element is one of the following (B, F, N, Y). How do I recreate that vector accept in the place of N put 0 and in the place of B, F or Y put a 1? Thanks, Jacob [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello all I would like to ask if there is adequate mechanism to authenticate users through POP3 against Active Directory by Outlook Express so that users will authenticate seamlessly using logon credentials. I have implemented LDAP authentication but users must supply their credentials to Outlook Express although they have logged on to Windows (AD). the ntlm auth in Dovecot 1.1 (windind)