similar to: Possible not expected behaviour with "delete" option

Hi Friends, I am using rsync to copy data from Production File Server to Disaster Recovery file server. I have 100Mbps link setup between these two servers. Folder structure is very deep. It is having path like /reports/folder1/date/folder2/file.tx, where we have 1600 directories like 'folder1', daily folders since last year in date folder and 2 folders for each date folder like folder2

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10545 Summary: Rsync first time deletes files, second time it synchronates files with same name Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned

Hello i have a machine A with 2 disks 1 et 2 running Debian Jessie on 1 is the system and the boot and the swap on 2 different partitions like /home /opt ETC..... i have a machine B with 1 disk running kali-linux and *100G free* Can i clone the disk 1 of machine A on the 100G free on machine B with rsync? If it is possible, how to do that? Many thanks TG -------------- next part --------------

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8856 Summary: --hard-links does not handle hard-linked symlinks correctly on FreeBSD Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws> wrote: > OK, first pass on TODO complete. .... This hardlink bug report is nearly 21 months old... So I took a look at it using 2.5.7. See below. > BUGS --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Fix hardlink reporting 2002/03/25 > (was: There seems

Michael Johnson - MJ <mj at revmj.com> wrote: > rsync -av /src/ /dst/ && touch /dst/done Aaaaahhhh, knew I'd miss some detail. All the syncs are pushed to the backup server. But that does give me an idea. I guess I could do that on the source, then sync the flag file over. rsync -avH ${other_gubbins} / user at remote.machine:/dest/ && touch /etc/donefile

I thought this command would do what I wanted, but instead it doesn't transfer any files: rsync -avh --stats --password-file=/var/rsync.passwd --include=Maildir/ --exclude=* mail::root/usr/home /backup/usr/ I want to backup ONLY the /usr/home/*/Maildir directories. I don't want any other files from any other directories to be transferred. I can see in the man page where this is a

Dear Rsync, I am seeing the following rsync error messages and I am wondering if it is a sign of trouble, expected behavior, or a bug: rsync: failed to hard-link /Volumes/backups/vanguard/backup.0/dev/agpgart with dev/agpgart: Invalid argument (22) rsync: failed to hard-link /Volumes/backups/vanguard/backup.0/dev/apm_bios with dev/apm_bios: Invalid argument (22) rsync: failed to hard-link

I tried rsync 2.6.1cvs on my FreeBSD 4.X boxes. It dumps core when preserve_hard_links and backup. And SUPPORT_HARD_LINKS is true. rsync -avH --delete --backup --backup-dir=/some/backup/dir \ srchost::dir/ dir/ The core says... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x80536c0 in keep_backup

Jw, Thank you so much for your reply. The commandline: rsync -avH --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh /www/kunder/web/ MYHOST:/www/kunder/web Solved all of my problems, and I'm now much closer to completing a servermove. I however have one last question. When enetring the above command, I'm asked to type the SSH password to start the transferr. Is there any way to include this in the above mentioned

Hi, The dialin conference via asterisk is over, one person is still in the conference room and accidentally does not hang up properly. Her meter at the phone company keeps running... I'd like to implement something to the effect of checking whether there is only one participant in the conference, and when this is the case, to cancel the call after a predefined time (perhaps 5 or 10 mins.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4310 Summary: Not correct transferring files Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: peter.schubnell@gmx.de

When I'm running "rsync --compare-dest" on a local Linux volume (ext4) it works as expected (duplicate files not created) however when same commands with same options are run on NTFS USB drive (in my scenario below mounted to /share/external/sdt5) all the files are copied regardless if they have been updated or not. I have spent many hours trying to figure out what could be wrong and

I have been having broken pipe messages for a while. I think since a network architecture change. But I am not sure because I have not been monitoring the errors closely before. I added this (https://rsync.samba.org/issues.html) rsync-debug.sh script with strace of 100. But I have no idea how to interper this output. I guess between 00:55:41 and 03:06:47 nothing is happening? And then some

Hi, I'm sure I'm missing something simple but I can't find it. We just set up a new server with Fedora Core 2 and I'm trying to set up an rsync to it. I've had this working to a Debian machine, so I'm almost sure my config is rsync config is good. I'm running rsync 2.6.2-1 in daemon mode on the server with the following config file: log file =

On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 00:39:42 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I still don't see an output from rsync --itemize-changes with an A/B > difference. What do you mean by saying the above things? Do you mean only the `--itemize-changes' is enough for my case? Or Do you want to see the output from my case of running on the

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 23:45:42 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > So, I am assuming that without --itemize-changes you couldn't tell the > difference between "I am transferring a file" and "I am fixing the > timestamp on a file". > > Even if I am right, you are probably still mis-using --checksum. When

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:27:56 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Any time rsync wants to do something to a file you don't think it should > be see what --itemize-changes says about it. In fact, -v is almost > entirely useless without --itemize-changes. In fact, if I was in charge > I would make -v include --itemize-changes.

The output of --list-only isn't as I expected as regards symlinks. Here are my test files: $ ls ./src -rw------- 1 michael michael 0 2018-09-05 09:18:15 file lrwxrwxrwx 1 michael michael 4 2018-09-05 09:18:28 near_symlink -> file lrwxrwxrwx 1 michael michael 23 2018-09-05 09:19:05 far_symlink -> /home/michael/Documents The "destination" dir is empty: $ ls ./dest

I''ve decided to take the plunge and go with Gentoo for my rails development and test box. I figure the easy of maintenance is worth the setup hassles. Anyway, I''m followin the instructions on the Gentoo web site. I''ve selected the ..''i686'' 2.6 kernel for my 700mhz amd processor, and choosen stage3 install option from CD. I''m now at the the