similar to: --link-dest. Time to 'building file list' incrementing

I've been running rsync as a cygwin task on Windows Server 2008 for about two months now. I'm using the --link-dest option to do a daily 'snapshot' of the contents of a server containing about 10TB of data, about 13 million files, to a Linux based NAS server. Things started out great but I soon noticed that the time take to complete was slowly incrementing. It started at around

Any ideas anyone? I still need at least a weekly backup of all data. The current workaround is just for the most active directories. Are there any diagnostics I can do which might shed some light on this? Thanks JohnOn 4 Jan 2019 09:53, John Simpson via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Kevin > > The link-dest parameter is a single directory (the previous day's

Dear List-serv members: How can I structure a for loop so that it will increment the counter by two using R? I am just looking for a simple example that shows where the incrementing part should go. Thanks! Jennifer -- Jennifer Hayes Clark Assistant Professor Department of Political Science University of Houston Houston, TX 77204-3011 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi All I have made my xapian indexer automatically create new indexes once it reaches X documents in each, and for each document that I add to each sub-index, I record its document_id and its index_id (relating to what index the document ended up in). writabledatabase_add_document() returns document_id:s beginning from 0 for each new index when you add new documents, like you would expect. So

Using the LLVM C++ API, if I want to create an array via an Alloca instruction like: Value *a = ir_builder.CreateAlloca( my_type, my_size ); and then I want to initialize each element of the array with values computed elsewhere like: for ( vector<Value*>::const_iterator i = v.begin(); i != v.end(); ++i ) { builder.CreateStore( *i, a ); // How do I increment 'a' to point to

How can I increment the value of a Date class? I want to add a day, month or year to a date. cheers Worik [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I need to increment cells of a matrix (collusionM). The indexes to increment are in an index (matchIndex). This is some of the code for (j in 1:(rows-1)) matchIndex[[j]] <- which(mx[j]==mx) for (j in 1:(rows-1)) collisionM[j,matchIndex[[j]]] <- collisionM[j,matchIndex[[j]]] + 1 I could put them in the same loop but this is slower. The first for statement is fine. It finds the matches

Hello, I have model which has a property named "name", I want to append a number to the end of the name when there is similar name in db. name, name1, name2... Is there a ready to use method in ruby and/or rails for doing so? Thanks in advance, - Dunnil

Ok, I have an table column that needs to auto-increment, but isn''t the primary key (although I guess it could be). The format for the column is "SR001234" and it needs to autoincrement like so: SR001234 SR001235 SR001236 ... SR999999 How can I do this? I know Ruby has some pretty nice constructs for doing things like this, but I just don''t quite see how to put them

Hi, I am trying a for loop from 1 to 100 by 1. However, if a condition does not get met, I want to "throw away" that iteration. So if my loop is for (i in 1:100) and i is say, 25 and the condition is not met then I don't want i to go up to 26. Is there a way to do that? I can't seem to manually adjust i because from what I understand, R creates 100 long vector and uses that to

Shouldn''t update_all be updating lock_version? As you can see from my console session below, it is upating the record (changed running attribute to true and returned 1 to show 1 recored was updated). But it did not increment lock_version. And optimistic locking is working correctly otherwise. As you can see below, lock version = 562 before and after the update_all call but it is

Thanks Steve, I will try this out. I hadn’t realised that TableGen was restricted to matching instructions with more than one output operand. I’m assuming that this is only a limitation for inferring an instruction from the patterns, because it does seem to manage schedules okay. Curiously, my memory Reg32+Reg16 pattern is very similar to yours (the 16-bit offset is sign-extended though):

I have a rudimentary implementation for load and store instructions, where the memory address operand is automatically post-incremented when the load or store instruction is issued. However, this is currently coded using custom lowering, and explicit pattern matching in the 'ISelDAGtoDAG' implementation. But it seems to me that I ought to be able to achieve this exclusively using

> From: Thomas Lumley >> >> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, John McHenry wrote: >> >> > Thanks, Gabor & Thomas. >> > >> > Apologies, but I used an example that obfuscated the question that I >> > wanted to ask. >> > >> > I really wanted to know how to have extra arguments in >> functions that >> > would allow,

Hi All, I'm looking for some hints on idiomatic R usage using 'lapply' or similar. What follows is a simple example from which to generalize my question... # Suppose, in this simple example, I want to plot a number of different lines in different colors; # I define the colors I wish to use and I plot them in a loop: d<-

Thanks again for your help Steve, I’m thinking perhaps my “SelectADDRrr” pattern is inadequate. The sign-extension is at the hardware level, the code generator sees (should see) it as a 16-bit signed register value. My implementation is just: bool SHAVEISelDAGtoDAG::SelectADDRrr(SDValue &Addr, SDValue &Base, SDValue &Offset) { if ((Addr.getOpcode() == ISD::ADD) { Base

I have great luck running rsync from one linux system to another, or from a windows system (with cwRsync) to a linux system. But when I try to do an rsync backup from one directory on a Windows system to another, it fails. The cwRsync says its version is 2.6.9. Here's my Rsync command, boiled down to its simplest: rsync -rlptgD -vvv --delete --delete-excluded --modify-window=2

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:2924 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2924 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 4634435d920b5d739ece1ce76cc115d78ece1d54b07edd1e05768bb4a5c50fe3 rhnsd-5.0.13-7.1.el7_4.x86_64.rpm Source:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2924 Bug ID: 2924 Summary: Order a limited host keys list in client based on the known hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.7p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: enhancement Priority:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:2164 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2164 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 3a58f914d6d7006cfcd310166bac2f357b6364bc32f131d1475ff68647cd71e5 kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.i686.rpm